Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA today like the airline in the book, "Nuts!"?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You do realize that Atlanta will be and is senior with respect to FAT guys. While we have a lot of commuters, there are a ton of guys that just want to stay in ATL. With ALL FAT guys as SWA FOs, that makes the situation even worse. Yes, ATL is a base but is untouchable for the majority of FAT FOs that want it.

Phred

Exactly. I'd be looking at about a decade to get back to Atlanta as a bottom of the list reserve FO. Not exactly very appealing.
Global seniority is often a poor reflection of local base seniority. I am a commuter and choose not to fly out of the base closest to my home because a further base affords me close to 20% better local base seniority. In the end Atlanta will be by far and away "mostly" former AirTran pilots with some original Southwest guys thrown in. Your seniority will probably more closely reflect your AT seniority than you are anticipating.
 
Exactly. I'd be looking at about a decade to get back to Atlanta as a bottom of the list reserve FO. Not exactly very appealing.

Bases?

My mentors gave me 3 pieces of advice- you'll get one- never choose an airline bc of their bases
They'll change.

But let me ask- did pinnacle and gulfstream hold any value for you?

Keep on looking for the negative fellas, but realize you sound immature when a whole lot of airline pilots have real problems.

Bases, ...,good lord. It's so clear you have no desire to do anything but leech. The last thing except a real airline pilot.
 
How, do you guys convince yourself of such greatness.

You can't believe that it's that simple do you. I agree with nimble. But lean?

How do you define "lean"?

Are you suggesting we all fly at air tran rates? You should tell our ops agents they ought to cross-train and take paycuts. You'll make lots of friends. I'm sure GK would love that, but we are the most highly unionized airline in the country. There are contracts, and there are diminishing returns from simplicity. And I'd say we have implemented quite a bit of operational best practices. That's good.

Let me understand what you are saying. Management Boot to the necks to force low cost? I know you guys have a beaten dog syndrome, but please tell us when you think that through Ty.


Thanks for the morning laugh. :laugh: :laugh::laugh:

It's pretty clear to most of us former AAI guys that AirTran was what SWA had once been- a smaller, nimble and innovative airline.

SWA had become a bloated, legacy version of itself and was getting left behind by the post-bankruptcy era of leaner, lower-cost legacies who are now merging and combining. Southwest HAD to do something; what used to work in the past was no longer working. Buying AAI was a smart, and necessary move.

Unfortunately, instead of taking the best practices of each carrier (like AAI's leaner, more efficient Gate and Ramp operations) SWA chose to do what it does with its airplane- dumb everything down to the lowest common denominator. It's disappointing that it hasn't used AAI to invigorate things, rather than just assimilate us, but those decisions are obviously not ours to make. . . . Hope they know what they're doing.
 
How, do you guys convince yourself of such greatness . . . . blah, blah blah . . . .

Let me understand what you are saying. Management Boot to the necks to force low cost? I know you guys have a beaten dog syndrome, but please tell us when you think that through Ty.

Yeah, that's it. We have beaten dog syndrome . . . and you have head-up-ass syndrome. Let's have this conversation in a few more years. For now, it would be a waste of time.

Ty
 
You do know that DOH would lose most about 20% of AT seniority in many cases much much more - I don't care to look it up now well after- but it's the product of us being older and having lots of pilots hired well before air tran was born-

The only way to get to 12% is to start giving you seniority in excess of where you'd be at DOH-

Btw, I don't know how you know I have piers, but I do at our lake house- and they swear they're just holding down the dock, not spewing out opinions

Btw- great movie
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...0KEwWjyDSUKZQLtdKkUIULw&bvm=bv.51773540,d.dGI


Wave,

I'd be able to hold Captain in any east coast Southwest base with DOH. Instead, I'm sitting amongst SWA 6 year FOs. Find me an Arbitration of a Major airline that wasn't in extremis, that turned out like that ?

Perhaps he really meant to say "piers".
 
Wave,

I'd be able to hold Captain in any east coast Southwest base with DOH. Instead, I'm sitting amongst SWA 6 year FOs. Find me an Arbitration of a Major airline that wasn't in extremis, that turned out like that ?

Perhaps he really meant to say "piers".


This seems unlikely. I'm barely able to hold MCO as a captain for next month (I'd be like 3rd or 4th from the bottom), and I've been here about 12-1/2 years. Unless you lost 6-1/2 to 7 years' seniority off your AirTran DOH, you wouldn't be "among 6 year SWA FOs," and simultaneously be able to hold MCO CA if you had your original AirTran DOH.

Not saying DOH wouldn't have been a much better deal for you (obviously it would), just that your claim is a bit of an exaggeration.

Bubba
 
March 2004 hire at SWA is reserve Captain in BWI......... MCO has been shrinking
March 2004 hire at AT is bottom third in BWI as an FO and won't see the left seat for a minimum of 6-8 years at the earliest at best (more like 9-10 years).
Not so much of an exaggeration.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top