Our "Team" leader out to lunch

[Whoosh!]

Those that think of unions as the answer are selfish. If they can't have what they want, the get together, create a mob and take by force what they think is rightfully theirs even if they are the minority of the entire company workforce. They take it and everybody else gets screwed.

I would love to meet you in person and see you say this. You'd never do it... you're too cowardly and you know it. Why else would you hide out behind words from a fake screen name?

 

[netjetwife]

There's the Village Idiot marching around the square,
muttering asinine comments and insulting footwear.
He's banging monotonously on his drum fud..fud..fud,
hurling abuse bombs at NJW, but every one's a dud.

Fellow posters beware of Fudspinners and their sticky webs of deceit. They hope to trap you and shove their words down your throat in an effort to stop the truth from coming out. Interested parties can read the actual post referenced by B19 on page 7 of the CS pay thread. Suffice it to say that he has grossly twisted my words (as desperate Fudspinners typically do) and falsely assigned to my post a meaning that was never there.... Watch your step, my friends, and don't slip in the FUD.

 

[WabiSabi]

I've mentioned this friend many, many times as one of the many reasons I dislike unions. You act like it's the first time. It's not.

I'm not selfish. Those that think of unions as the answer are selfish. If they can't have what they want, the get together, create a mob and take by force what they think is rightfully theirs even if they are the minority of the entire company workforce. They take it and everybody else gets screwed.

It has been clearly stated by NJW that if you are not covered by a CBA, then you haven't invested properly in your career because you had the chance at becoming a pilot and didn't. Now that is disrespect. She dumped on every non-pilot employee of NetJets. When you look up the word "deplorable" in the dictionary, all you see beside it is the word "Netjetwife" and a picture of a really ugly boot.
No, it's not shame on me... it's shame on you.

Hey Bob. "I know you are but what am I?" only works in Pee Wee Herman movies. The shame is truly on you for using your chicken$hit alleged "friend". How pathetic.

 

[B19 Flyer]

I would love to meet you in person and see you say this. You'd never do it... you're too cowardly and you know it. Why else would you hide out behind words from a fake screen name?

I have personally said that to a union spokesman during a work action. As a matter of fact, he agreed with me. But it's different over a beer, isn't it? That's when you can talk factual, and not beat the damn union drum. It was just before I got laid off the first time.

 

[B19 Flyer]

There's the Village Idiot marching around the square,
muttering asinine comments and insulting footwear.

There is only room for one, and she wears boots and has no respect for any employee at any fractional unless they are a pilot. She is consistent in her posts. The union must "win" a contract, not negotiate a contract and only pilots are the ones that "invest" in their careers thus they are the only ones entitled to the big bucks.

My pointing out her flaws has nothing to to with Fear, Uncertainty or Doubt. It's only the truth, and she can't handle the truth.

She loves to use the word FUD, but doesn't practice what she preaches. All she does is have contempt and disrespect for those that chose a different career path.

Her posts are crystal clear, and when I point these out, she writes volumes trying to get out of what she wrote.

Shakespeare described her best:​

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."​

 

[Voice Of Reason]

When illiterate goons attempt to be literate

Shakespeare described her best:
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

Clearly, you need to spend less time on this board and more time studying Shakespeare, should you in the future choose to again post random quotes you do not understand (...and thus, indicating favor with your opponent rather than the intended displeasure).
Your interpretation of the word "protest" is in a modern context, and certainly not a Shakespearean one. "Protest" in the time of Hamlet indicated a serious declaration or vow, not protest in an objecting fashion.
Now consider yourself just a speck more educated this morning, and contact the nearest educational institution to enroll immediately. You have spent far too much time obsessing over FLOPS pilots, and far too little time meeting the challenge of being a knowledgeable adversary against their advanced class of intellect. Go enlighten yourself elsewhere simpleton, as we shall not be going anywhere.
Carry on.

 

[Voice Of Reason]

The company lost when it put in place a CEO that doesn't know anything about aviation. There is a union on the property for no other reason than the fact that Michael Sheeringa was placed in charge. Anything you want to blame on the union, you must first address why it came into reality. Anything you want to blame on the union, you must first blame Michael Sheeringa, who is single-handedly responsible for the union's existence.

He is the sole, primary, number one, singular reason:
-a union was voted in
-why Flight Options is the least profitable fractional provider in the nation
-why the company has historic employee attrition
-why the company has historic owner attrition
-why Flight Options can't attract new pilots
-why the FAA is investigating an infamously corrupt maintenance department
-why the company's reputation has been ruined
-why Cleveland is dysfunctionally incompetent
-why Flight Options employees are the lowest paid in the fractional industry, and the hardest working.

Most pilots didn't want a union at Flight Options. Obviously, things got so bad that it became the lesser of two evils. Michael Sheeringa is the only reason that happened.

To oppose the Union presently, means you support Michael Sheeringa and all of the points made above. To oppose the Union and support Michael Sheeringa means you support pencil-whipping maintenance, it means you support dangerous and abusive scheduling practices, it means you support pitifully low standards of living, it means you support pitifully low pilot wages, it means you support robbing-Peter-to-pay-Paul, it means you support stepping over dollars to pick up dimes, and it means you actually support all of the things that this one man has done to hurt a lot of people and their families.

It is a full-grown man's responsibility to provide and protect his wife and children. Thats the #1. When someone or some thing threatens your wife and kids, you don't sit on your hands, you do something. Since no one would listen to any of the pilots, or take any of them seriously, they were forced to organize in order to get their voices heard and their families better provided for. Period. Its that simple.

The company IS its employees. Nothing more. The company lost when Michael Sheeringa stepped foot on the tarmac out front.

What a wonderful post, and a concise expression of what has occurred here.

 

[mxpilot2]

B19, I may know nothing of unions and negotiations, but a contract is a "battle" and needs to be "won" (and would feel like a victory) when you're contending with management stonewalling.

Negotiating requires both sides to work at an agreement. One side throws out a suggestion, the other counters, until a viable solution is reached. Not one side throws out a suggestion, and the other side says, "F U, get back to work, when we say, how we say, and in what POS we tell you to fly".

There's always a better deal, no one just has to take what is given. And definitely shouldn't have things taken away, that's bad faith. And one shouldn't have to leave to make it better.

Employee retention is good business, and is currently recognized everywhere as more cost effective. FLOPS management seems to be out to sink this ship, and the pilots don't want to go down without trying to swim.

Chris

 

[netjetwife]

Good post, Mxpilot2...

Contracts are considered routine among professionals so giving the Options pilots so much grief over their preference for one fails to accord the pilot group the recognition and respect they have earned for their significant contribution to the company.

We got new garage doors last fall and the company had me sign a contract. No disrespect to the nice guys who did a good job, (take note of that word-twister/B19) but their skills don't economically compare to professional pilots responsible for lives and aircraft worth millions of dollars. If garage door installers won't work without a contract how can any reasonable person expect frac pilots to?!

When you hold the moral high ground dig in your heels and insist on fair treatment.

 

[Whoosh!]

I have personally said that to a union spokesman during a work action. As a matter of fact, he agreed with me. But it's different over a beer, isn't it? That's when you can talk factual, and not beat the damn union drum. It was just before I got laid off the first time.

Was he a scab like you? Or.. hey, wait a minute- sounds like it could have been your bud you sent himself to the grave... am I right?

Your mind in terribly skewed, B19. I posted a response to an accusation you clearly know is off the wall biased and you come back with "I talked to this guy I knew once who agreed with me". Do you really not see how dumb that sounds? Especially when you're going up against the REST OF THE INDUSTRY. Aren't you embarrassed? There are always exceptions to the rule. The people you're preaching to are smarter than you think. As I said, you're doing a pretty pathetic job if you're being paid to be here... I'm surprised you haven't been let go yet. Or maybe you're doing this because you couldn't make it anywhere else.

 

[SilverSurfer]

Sh!tfinger stacking our deck with neophytes

I hate to interrupt this fascination that all of you have with exchanging meaningless words with a moron like "Bob/B19", just wanted to see if any of you had considered the latest effects of the latest bad decision made by our "Moron Team Leader"


Recently we Floptions pilots received a email from management announcing that we will be getting a new HR VP taking the place of Shirley Kaufman. Lets consider this change and what its effects may be. Keep in mind that Kaufman not only filled the HR VP position but also sat in on negotiations for management. We would assume that this new HR VP would assume the same responsibilities.

Kaufman came to Floptions with a background in aviation and having experience with labor contracts pertaining to pilots. Her experience was in the 121 area but was related to matters with aviation and pilots. That experience I'm sure gave her a basis on which to understand issues and form ideas related to proposals that are being made at the negotiations table.

Her replacement is a lawyer with a background in HR but has zero experience with any segment of aviation. If he assumes Kaufman's seat at the negotiations table, other then a law degree and HR experience, what experience will he bring to the table? How will this man really have any idea what is being discussed as our negotiators express concerns over the way things are currently done at Floptions and make proposals to correct them. He can't. He will be getting his aviation education while sitting at the table. This will likely not be a good omen for our negotiators.

The decision to hire a man having no relevant experience into a position that has such broad reaching effect on us and our contract negotiations is another in a long list of poor decisions that Sh!tfinger has made. This man and his lack of relevant background could have the effect of throwing the brakes on the momentum of negotiations just as we are hearing things are picking up.

Personally I think that Sh!tfinger looks for these types, as he did with the garage door salesman to be our VP of sales, types that are aviation inexperienced so as not to shine a light on his own limited and faulty background. He should be looking for management that has worked in our industry and that will not go through a long period playing catch up. Knowing nothing relative to our industry these neophytes make bad decisions and bad mistakes negatively effecting our company and us.

Sh!tfinger is a moron that doesn't know what he's doing so he surrounds himself with people that know even less then he does.

 

[SilverSurfer]

Sh!tfinger has a problem with the truth

Sh!tfinger has always had a problem with the truth from the beginning of his tenior at Floptions. But his latest interview published in AIN is filled with out and out lies or distortions of the truth.

Here are the first lies that are verifiable in his interview.

AIN interview: Flight Options COO Michael Scheeringa

By Jeff Burger
March 1, 2008
People


http://www.ainonline.com/news/singl...-scheeringa/news/single-news-page/?no_cache=1“I started when I was six,” said Michael Scheeringa, when asked how he wound up in aviation. “I grew up in Phoenix, and when I was in grade school, I used to take the city bus to the airport and watch airplanes take off and land, and count passengers. At that point, I thought I’d want to build airports.”

Scheeringa’s ambitions evolved, but his fascination with aviation remained. "By age 16, he was taking flight lessons. (He subsequently earned a pilot’s license but gave up flying for lack of time.)"


We have talked directly with the FAA in OKC and verified that Sh!tfinger has never held a pilots licenses of any kind, not even a student certificate. This only serves to add to speculation about why he has demonstrated through out his carrier such a disdain for pilots. Might it be that he has always wanted to fly but never had the guts or the aptitude to do it.


Later, while attending Arizona State University, Scheeringa worked at America West Airlines. In 1991 he took a position at US Airways, where he ultimately became a vice president. Then, in 2004, he moved to Flight Options–a leading fractional provider that also offers jet cards and aircraft management–where he started as COO.


He did not move anywhere, he was fired form US airways after creating the most antagonistic environment between management and the pilots that has ever existed in the company. He has continued his attack on pilots in his time at Floptions resulting in the state of war we find ourselves in.


[Raytheon, which owned the company, recently sold it to a private-equity firm.–Ed.]
At the time, both US Airways and Flight Options faced major financial problems, and we wondered why Scheeringa decided to jump from one frying pan to another–if not into the fire itself.


He came to Floptions because he needed a job after being fired from US Airways for his incompetence. How he managed to get a job with us after the track record he has begs many questions.

There are other statements that Sh!tfinger made in his interview that are patent lies, distortions, or counter to statements that he has made in the past. We are going through them statement by statement and will expose what a lying POS that "M" really is.

 

[WabiSabi]

Sh!tfinger has always had a problem with the truth from the beginning of his tenior at Floptions. But his latest interview published in AIN is filled with out and out lies or distortions of the truth.

Here are the first lies that are verifiable in his interview.




There are other statements that Sh!tfinger made in his interview that are patent lies, distortions, or counter to statements that he has made in the past. We are going through them statement by statement and will expose what a lying POS that "M" really is.

heh heh Shirtfinger! put that in your pipe and smoke it! too bad that AIN would never put your comments in its letters to the editor.

 

[SilverSurfer]

Reporter verified

heh heh Shirtfinger! put that in your pipe and smoke it! too bad that AIN would never put your comments in its letters to the editor.

A call was made to the AIN reporter that wrote the article to verify that this was a Sh!tfinger quote. He did verify that everything that he wrote in the article was directly from "M".

His lies are in print, he will have a hard time hiding from them.:laugh:

 

[netjetwife]

We have talked directly with the FAA in OKC and verified that Sh!tfinger has never held a pilots licenses of any kind, not even a student certificate. He did not move anywhere, he was fired form US airways after creating the most antagonistic environment between management and the pilots that has ever existed in the company.

MS has never flown and he didn't move from US Airways? I wouldn't be so sure about that Silver. It sure sounds to me as if MS flew out the door after getting the black boot from US Air.... Then he moved in on another pilot group where he again caused havoc and mayhem.

Imagery aside, Options pilots are right to be disgusted with the lack of integrity at the top. Working under a contract isn't just your best Option, it's clearly a necessary step required to protect your career and your family's income. Hang in there guys! Your cause is justified. NJW

You hold the moral high ground so dig in your heels and insist on a professional contract.