Rubber Ducky
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2005
- Posts
- 143
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
B19, that was a pathetic attempt to draw sympathy for your rediculous cause. Basically, the logic you're trying to pass is: unions = "unwarranted" events = people killing themselves. You're just as mentally ill as your "friend" was.
The company lost when it put in place a CEO that doesn't know anything about aviation. There is a union on the property for no other reason than the fact that Michael Sheeringa was placed in charge. Anything you want to blame on the union, you must first address why it came into reality. Anything you want to blame on the union, you must first blame Michael Sheeringa, who is single-handedly responsible for the union's existence.
He is the sole, primary, number one, singular reason:
-a union was voted in
-why Flight Options is the least profitable fractional provider in the nation
-why the company has historic employee attrition
-why the company has historic owner attrition
-why Flight Options can't attract new pilots
-why the FAA is investigating an infamously corrupt maintenance department
-why the company's reputation has been ruined
-why Cleveland is dysfunctionally incompetent
-why Flight Options employees are the lowest paid in the fractional industry, and the hardest working.
Most pilots didn't want a union at Flight Options. Obviously, things got so bad that it became the lesser of two evils. Michael Sheeringa is the only reason that happened.
To oppose the Union presently, means you support Michael Sheeringa and all of the points made above. To oppose the Union and support Michael Sheeringa means you support pencil-whipping maintenance, it means you support dangerous and abusive scheduling practices, it means you support pitifully low standards of living, it means you support pitifully low pilot wages, it means you support robbing-Peter-to-pay-Paul, it means you support stepping over dollars to pick up dimes, and it means you actually support all of the things that this one man has done to hurt a lot of people and their families.
It is a full-grown man's responsibility to provide and protect his wife and children. Thats the #1. When someone or some thing threatens your wife and kids, you don't sit on your hands, you do something. Since no one would listen to any of the pilots, or take any of them seriously, they were forced to organize in order to get their voices heard and their families better provided for. Period. Its that simple.
The company IS its employees. Nothing more. The company lost when Michael Sheeringa stepped foot on the tarmac out front.
why the company has historic owner attrition
Tell that to my friend now in an urn in after he killed himself because of a job loss due to an unwarranted union action.
Bad management can be changed overnight. Many of the most successful CEOs never had a day in the industry.
Once a union is on the property, the entire company is forever threatened.
So your friend was weak and couldn't handle the situation that he had put himself in. So the only cowerdly thing to do is suicide. hmmmm. Don't look for any sympathy here
I have lots of sympathy for all involved IF any tragedy actually took place, but real suicides result from a lack of hope (there's always another job out there so that doesn't apply) and numerous personal problems compounded by the lack of emotional support. Furloughed workers are typically offered lots of sympathy so that doesn't fit either. DL, your instincts to doubt a fishy story are valid. Given B19's prejudice against unions and his refusal to answer questions about his present job, his claim is highly doubtful. The reality is that Union Busters and FUD-Spreaders routinely resort to fear-inducing lies and bogus scapegoating.
Tell that to my friend now in an urn in after he killed himself because of a job loss due to an unwarranted union action.
To use the Death of a Friend to try to "Score Points" in a Pro Union/ Anti Union debate you seem to want to engage in, is such a deplorable act, that I am at a loss for words.
But I'm actually glad you did it B19. It showed all readers of these threads just why you are so fire breathing Anti Union.
You are a highly selfish individual who thinks of no one but himself. Seems that you got yours Bob, and you could care less about the rest of us.
To use the Death of a Friend to try and score points. Bob: Your friend is most likely rolling over is his grave at your abuse of his memory.
Shame on you.
Freedom is Not Free.
I've mentioned this friend many, many times as one of the many reasons I dislike unions. You act like it's the first time. It's not.
I'm not selfish. Those that think of unions as the answer are selfish. If they can't have what they want, the get together, create a mob and take by force what they think is rightfully theirs even if they are the minority of the entire company workforce. They take it and everybody else gets screwed.
It has been clearly stated by NJW that if you are not covered by a CBA, then you haven't invested properly in your career because you had the chance at becoming a pilot and didn't. Now that is disrespect. She dumped on every non-pilot employee of NetJets. When you look up the word "deplorable" in the dictionary, all you see beside it is the word "Netjetwife" and a picture of a really ugly boot.
No, it's not shame on me... it's shame on you.
I would love to meet you in person and see you say this. You'd never do it... you're too cowardly and you know it. Why else would you hide out behind words from a fake screen name?Those that think of unions as the answer are selfish. If they can't have what they want, the get together, create a mob and take by force what they think is rightfully theirs even if they are the minority of the entire company workforce. They take it and everybody else gets screwed.
I've mentioned this friend many, many times as one of the many reasons I dislike unions. You act like it's the first time. It's not.
I'm not selfish. Those that think of unions as the answer are selfish. If they can't have what they want, the get together, create a mob and take by force what they think is rightfully theirs even if they are the minority of the entire company workforce. They take it and everybody else gets screwed.
It has been clearly stated by NJW that if you are not covered by a CBA, then you haven't invested properly in your career because you had the chance at becoming a pilot and didn't. Now that is disrespect. She dumped on every non-pilot employee of NetJets. When you look up the word "deplorable" in the dictionary, all you see beside it is the word "Netjetwife" and a picture of a really ugly boot.
No, it's not shame on me... it's shame on you.
I would love to meet you in person and see you say this. You'd never do it... you're too cowardly and you know it. Why else would you hide out behind words from a fake screen name?
There's the Village Idiot marching around the square,
muttering asinine comments and insulting footwear.
Shakespeare described her best:
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
The company lost when it put in place a CEO that doesn't know anything about aviation. There is a union on the property for no other reason than the fact that Michael Sheeringa was placed in charge. Anything you want to blame on the union, you must first address why it came into reality. Anything you want to blame on the union, you must first blame Michael Sheeringa, who is single-handedly responsible for the union's existence.
He is the sole, primary, number one, singular reason:
-a union was voted in
-why Flight Options is the least profitable fractional provider in the nation
-why the company has historic employee attrition
-why the company has historic owner attrition
-why Flight Options can't attract new pilots
-why the FAA is investigating an infamously corrupt maintenance department
-why the company's reputation has been ruined
-why Cleveland is dysfunctionally incompetent
-why Flight Options employees are the lowest paid in the fractional industry, and the hardest working.
Most pilots didn't want a union at Flight Options. Obviously, things got so bad that it became the lesser of two evils. Michael Sheeringa is the only reason that happened.
To oppose the Union presently, means you support Michael Sheeringa and all of the points made above. To oppose the Union and support Michael Sheeringa means you support pencil-whipping maintenance, it means you support dangerous and abusive scheduling practices, it means you support pitifully low standards of living, it means you support pitifully low pilot wages, it means you support robbing-Peter-to-pay-Paul, it means you support stepping over dollars to pick up dimes, and it means you actually support all of the things that this one man has done to hurt a lot of people and their families.
It is a full-grown man's responsibility to provide and protect his wife and children. Thats the #1. When someone or some thing threatens your wife and kids, you don't sit on your hands, you do something. Since no one would listen to any of the pilots, or take any of them seriously, they were forced to organize in order to get their voices heard and their families better provided for. Period. Its that simple.
The company IS its employees. Nothing more. The company lost when Michael Sheeringa stepped foot on the tarmac out front.
Was he a scab like you? Or.. hey, wait a minute- sounds like it could have been your bud you sent himself to the grave... am I right?I have personally said that to a union spokesman during a work action. As a matter of fact, he agreed with me. But it's different over a beer, isn't it? That's when you can talk factual, and not beat the damn union drum. It was just before I got laid off the first time.
AIN interview: Flight Options COO Michael Scheeringa
By Jeff Burger
March 1, 2008
People
http://www.ainonline.com/news/singl...-scheeringa/news/single-news-page/?no_cache=1“I started when I was six,” said Michael Scheeringa, when asked how he wound up in aviation. “I grew up in Phoenix, and when I was in grade school, I used to take the city bus to the airport and watch airplanes take off and land, and count passengers. At that point, I thought I’d want to build airports.”
Scheeringa’s ambitions evolved, but his fascination with aviation remained. "By age 16, he was taking flight lessons. (He subsequently earned a pilot’s license but gave up flying for lack of time.)"
We have talked directly with the FAA in OKC and verified that Sh!tfinger has never held a pilots licenses of any kind, not even a student certificate. This only serves to add to speculation about why he has demonstrated through out his carrier such a disdain for pilots. Might it be that he has always wanted to fly but never had the guts or the aptitude to do it.
Later, while attending Arizona State University, Scheeringa worked at America West Airlines. In 1991 he took a position at US Airways, where he ultimately became a vice president. Then, in 2004, he moved to Flight Options–a leading fractional provider that also offers jet cards and aircraft management–where he started as COO.
He did not move anywhere, he was fired form US airways after creating the most antagonistic environment between management and the pilots that has ever existed in the company. He has continued his attack on pilots in his time at Floptions resulting in the state of war we find ourselves in.
[Raytheon, which owned the company, recently sold it to a private-equity firm.–Ed.]
At the time, both US Airways and Flight Options faced major financial problems, and we wondered why Scheeringa decided to jump from one frying pan to another–if not into the fire itself.
He came to Floptions because he needed a job after being fired from US Airways for his incompetence. How he managed to get a job with us after the track record he has begs many questions.
Sh!tfinger has always had a problem with the truth from the beginning of his tenior at Floptions. But his latest interview published in AIN is filled with out and out lies or distortions of the truth.
Here are the first lies that are verifiable in his interview.
There are other statements that Sh!tfinger made in his interview that are patent lies, distortions, or counter to statements that he has made in the past. We are going through them statement by statement and will expose what a lying POS that "M" really is.
heh heh Shirtfinger! put that in your pipe and smoke it!too bad that AIN would never put your comments in its letters to the editor.