say again
I love her ARSE!!!!
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Posts
- 4,006
limodriver1 said:Isn't definition of Scab different than happends in GOjet , freedom etc. situation
Why don't loosening up!
Yeah, I said it!
I em we todd did!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
limodriver1 said:Isn't definition of Scab different than happends in GOjet , freedom etc. situation
Why don't loosening up!
Yeah, I said it!
I would imagine that their mindset is that since this is a new carrier, they will be the first ones on the seniority list and if things prosper it will mean quick seniority and upgrades for them. From my understanding nothing is banning GoJet from flying for all other airlines, just the ones that have restrictive scope for 70 seat aircraft.Traderd said:Thanks, but if the newhires at GoJet are going to be banned from all other airline flying, won't that translate into stagnation in terms of upgrades from FO to Captain? I assume you mean upgrade to a 70 seat even if they remain an FO.
pianoman said:ALPA just held a rally for the TSA pilots to try and stop this.
CEO silly sap said:Im sure all the hard feelings will blow over in a month or two, and then we can all be friends and jumpseat together and all laugh
PCL_128 said:Fat chance. Anybody got a list together of these scumbags yet?
SkyBoy1981 said:I would imagine that their mindset is that since this is a new carrier, they will be the first ones on the seniority list and if things prosper it will mean quick seniority and upgrades for them. From my understanding nothing is banning GoJet from flying for all other airlines, just the ones that have restrictive scope for 70 seat aircraft.
CEO silly sap said:Im sure all the hard feelings will blow over in a month or two, and then we can all be friends and jumpseat together and all laugh at how this career sure has changed since the first Airport movie with Drinkin Dean.
Traderd said:By "banned" I only mean in terms of notional, not contractual. Just look at the references to "scabs" and "scumbags" and I will assume unless the threat is empty, these guys would have a very difficult time finding employment within the industry after working at GoJets. Now if the threat is empty, well then maybe the upgrades will come quickly enough.
FreedomAList said:Be the bigger man
JackFlyer said:Well this thread has been going for several days now. The same few people keep posting the same things over and over. There 700+ pilots at TSA and based on these post (since it's the same people over and over).... only about less than 1% of the TSA pilots even care. The same vocal minority have been posting over and over. Let this one die.
TSA you basically have two options:
1) Let GoJets Fly and go work for them.
or
2) Get rid of your AA feed and fly your CRJ's
Seems simple to me!
I am just sick of listening to the whining...
Can't always have your cake and eat it too!
Haha. You tell 'em.ricj41 said:Jackflyer get your head out of your ass. Just because we Trans States pilots don't argue with you on a stupid f***ing message board doesn't mean we don't care about the go jet issue. Over 200 tsa pilots were at a meeting last week in stl about this issue. Out of 700. You do the math. That meeting included the Eagle MEC chairman who was also at our MEC chairmans grievance hearing last year. Quit complaining about us flying Eagle aircraft we can't do anything about it. The only few on this board are you and fuelflow,who most likely is a management tool, who see nothing wrong with gojet. Stop being so bitter.
JackFlyer said:Well this thread has been going for several days now. The same few people keep posting the same things over and over. There 700+ pilots at TSA and based on these post (since it's the same people over and over).... only about less than 1% of the TSA pilots even care. The same vocal minority have been posting over and over. Let this one die.
TSA you basically have two options:
1) Let GoJets Fly and go work for them.
or
2) Get rid of your AA feed and fly your CRJ's
Seems simple to me!
I am just sick of listening to the whining...
Can't always have your cake and eat it too!
JackFlyer said:Well this thread has been going for several days now. The same few people keep posting the same things over and over. There 700+ pilots at TSA and based on these post (since it's the same people over and over).... only about less than 1% of the TSA pilots even care. The same vocal minority have been posting over and over. Let this one die.
TSA you basically have two options:
1) Let GoJets Fly and go work for them.
or
2) Get rid of your AA feed and fly your CRJ's
Seems simple to me!
I am just sick of listening to the whining...
Can't always have your cake and eat it too!
MINIME said:What we try to control, is our compensation and work rules that we negotiate, normally through our respective unions. Encouraging people to go work for a place such as GoJet, undermine our gains in these areas. Not to mention, possibly leave some out on the street through furloughs and spin offs, since wholly owneds appear to be an expensive commodity for managements now at days. If this is allowed to go forward, you can say goodbye to good contracts and a big FAT hello to GoJet and Freedom. Cause they'll be more than happy to bump you aside while they fly that shiny new jet (for 50 bucks an hour) right into your job.
medic&cfi said:Relieftube:
They're working on it. An expidited grievance was filed. For right now that's all we can do.
JackFlyer said:I was told that ALPA did not expidite the grievamce. They know they don' t have much of a leg to stand on.