SWA/FL Codeshare

[Lear70]

So stop talking about it then. K?

Hard to resist correcting blatantly false information. Go back and take a look. The only time I say something about it is when someone else posts incorrect information.

 

[ATLplt]

We all wish SWA would not have bought your company. Every single one of us.

Turns out there is unity. Nearly 8000 pilots feel exactly the same way about something.

 

[Dash Power]

Hard to resist correcting blatantly false information. Go back and take a look. The only time I say something about it is when someone else posts incorrect information.

I went back and looked and I saw nothing blatantly false.

Now what?

 

[PCL_128]

Spot on.

Curiously only an outsider seems to be the angriest one of all.

Oh, I promise you, he's not the angriest.

 

[Lear70]

I went back and looked and I saw nothing blatantly false.

Now what?

Then your definition needs work. Pretty clear stuff.

OldManPilot was wrong about ALPA selling him out by not fighting harder for those who got stapled.

Scoreboard said he thought the list was fair because not one SWA pilot will retire at a lower position than they would have at a stand-alone SWA. I pointed out that just because ONE side thinks a deal is fair, does not a fair deal make, and we came to an understanding of where the pilots are on both sides of that issue.

Then CanyonBlue came out saying that he hated the talk of "relative seniority" and said he found it funny that HIS seniority didn't increase 60-70%, inferring that the numbers were off. So I explained how that worked with real numbers.

Then dipwit chimed in with a personal attack.

Then TriPower had to come on here and say that we "gave up" Capt seats and pay from day one, which is a blatant falsehood, or did you miss that one?

Then he also said many SWA pilots were PERMANENTLY harmed, a falsehood I again had to clear up, going back to what Scoreboard said way back on page 5 or so... no SWA pilot retires at a lesser relative seniority position - that's how the list was created by SWA management.

Then Flyin guy accused me of lying about the math, a blatant falsehood I had to clear up with my exact placement on the pre- and post-merger list. The math is the math is the math, and my loss isn't 'math magic', it's just plain old math.

Any questions?

 

[say again]

I went back and looked and I saw nothing blatantly false.

Now what?

Of course you didn't!! :beer:

 

[General Lee]

Spot on.

Curiously only an outsider seems to be the angriest one of all.

"angriest?" I am just pointing out what a complete load of crock it is. My AT friends agree too. And btw, this isn't an inclusive board. "An outsider?" Dork!


Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[General Lee]

Then your definition needs work. Pretty clear stuff.

OldManPilot was wrong about ALPA selling him out by not fighting harder for those who got stapled.

Scoreboard said he thought the list was fair because not one SWA pilot will retire at a lower position than they would have at a stand-alone SWA. I pointed out that just because ONE side thinks a deal is fair, does not a fair deal make, and we came to an understanding of where the pilots are on both sides of that issue.

Then CanyonBlue came out saying that he hated the talk of "relative seniority" and said he found it funny that HIS seniority didn't increase 60-70%, inferring that the numbers were off. So I explained how that worked with real numbers.

Then dipwit chimed in with a personal attack.

Then TriPower had to come on here and say that we "gave up" Capt seats and pay from day one, which is a blatant falsehood, or did you miss that one?

Then he also said many SWA pilots were PERMANENTLY harmed, a falsehood I again had to clear up, going back to what Scoreboard said way back on page 5 or so... no SWA pilot retires at a lesser relative seniority position - that's how the list was created by SWA management.

Then Flyin guy accused me of lying about the math, a blatant falsehood I had to clear up with my exact placement on the pre- and post-merger list. The math is the math is the math, and my loss isn't 'math magic', it's just plain old math.

Any questions?

Well stated Lear. Many of these Corndogs will never admit to any possible wrong doing by SWAPA. Typical.

BTW Lear, I hope you at least consider the other airline based in ATL when hiring eventually kicks in. It might be a good alternative.


Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[Lear70]

General, I'm not trying to rub anyone's face in the perceived "wrongness" on one side of the argument "fence" or another, just pointing out that the only time I bring these arguments up is when someone says something so untrue that I can't just let it go without clarification.

Do I understand that they don't like the deal? Sure. There's lots not to like on BOTH sides.

But that's no reason to start talking about it in ways that are patently false.

 

[Dash Power]

Then your definition needs work. Pretty clear stuff.

OldManPilot was wrong about ALPA selling him out by not fighting harder for those who got stapled.

Scoreboard said he thought the list was fair because not one SWA pilot will retire at a lower position than they would have at a stand-alone SWA. I pointed out that just because ONE side thinks a deal is fair, does not a fair deal make, and we came to an understanding of where the pilots are on both sides of that issue.

Then CanyonBlue came out saying that he hated the talk of "relative seniority" and said he found it funny that HIS seniority didn't increase 60-70%, inferring that the numbers were off. So I explained how that worked with real numbers.

Then dipwit chimed in with a personal attack.

Then TriPower had to come on here and say that we "gave up" Capt seats and pay from day one, which is a blatant falsehood, or did you miss that one?

Then he also said many SWA pilots were PERMANENTLY harmed, a falsehood I again had to clear up, going back to what Scoreboard said way back on page 5 or so... no SWA pilot retires at a lesser relative seniority position - that's how the list was created by SWA management.

Then Flyin guy accused me of lying about the math, a blatant falsehood I had to clear up with my exact placement on the pre- and post-merger list. The math is the math is the math, and my loss isn't 'math magic', it's just plain old math.

Any questions?

Yeah. Do you find it a coincidence that after 5 years of negotiating you got your contract with the large raises after SWA bought your company after a few months earlier your pilot group overwhelmingly by over 90% voted to strike?

The AT guys I have met on the line have great attitudes and say they are real happy to be here. So I won't take you and others on this board and stereo type how freakin clueless you are when you you look at this outside your myopic vision.

And General, you have no friends. You are sick little neurotic FI psycho with a penis so small it is called a clitoris.