BOYCAPTAIN
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2008
- Posts
- 270
I just want to add that wearing a backpack is not ok. What can you need so bad that you can't fit it into your overnight bag.
what about all that hair gel????????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just want to add that wearing a backpack is not ok. What can you need so bad that you can't fit it into your overnight bag.
The comments weren't condescending, they were factual. The fact of the matter is, far too many pilots are preoccupied with things like golf and American Idol. These things seem to take a higher priority for them over things that affect their career. If you consider telling it how it is to be "condescending," then that's your prerogative, but it's not accurate.So, in your posts with N1N2 where you make condecending comments about him not attending BOD meetings because he is "to busy watching American Idol" (http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?t=110555&page=5), which part of the above CoE are you adhering to? Is it the bullet point? Is this how you bring others up to the "standards demanded?"
T8
If you consider telling it how it is to be "condescending," then that's your prerogative, but it's not accurate.
The comments weren't condescending, they were factual. The fact of the matter is, far too many pilots are preoccupied with things like golf and American Idol. These things seem to take a higher priority for them over things that affect their career. If you consider telling it how it is to be "condescending," then that's your prerogative, but it's not accurate.
I know for a fact that he was somewhere other than the BOD because he said so himself. He had an opportunity to see his union in action, just as every other member does, but passed it up. Fact.So you know for a fact that he was indeed watching American Idol, instead of attending the BOD...
Correction: I used to represent the Association. I'm no longer a rep, and am actually on inactive status. As for the code, as I said, my posts are not in conflict with the CoE.You are an ALPA member. You represent the Pilot's Union. You said you adhere to the code. But your posts on this site don't reveal that.
I know for a fact that he was somewhere other than the BOD because he said so himself. He had an opportunity to see his union in action, just as every other member does, but passed it up. Fact.
Correction: I used to represent the Association. I'm no longer a rep, and am actually on inactive status. As for the code, as I said, my posts are not in conflict with the CoE.
The American Idol comment was an example of the myriad things that uninvolved pilots prioritize above their union and their careers. If you take it as condescension, then you're a little too sensitive.
Yep, and I stand by that. We gonna keep going around in circles on this? You view something as being condescending that simply wasn't. Arguing about your perceptions all night isn't going to do us any good. If you choose to perceive condescension, that's your business.You said, "I adhere to the CoE."
Yep, and I stand by that. We gonna keep going around in circles on this? You view something as being condescending that simply wasn't. Arguing about your perceptions all night isn't going to do us any good. If you choose to perceive condescension, that's your business.
Thank God for that 'unfortunality' Rez...
Of course I'm assuming you subscribe to the mantra "Conform or be cast out..."
Room for everyone I suspect, plus it's just a job.
Easily done...
The overwelming display of a condescending attitude toward individuals whom disagree with you...which purveys the many posts, is an indication of your/PCL's professionalism...or perhaps, the lack of it.
As for a personal "canon" I'll stick with "do unto others as you would have them do to you." If you stick with that "canon," you won't go wrong.
On this site, we often cut off our fellow aviatior's nose...then ask him to smell a rose. It doesn't work.
T8
Here is how the UAW does it; they reach a deal with a single company, then go to the next company and say match it or you will be shutdown and all the new cars being sold will be built someplace else, then they go to the next company and repeat. When the auto companies where rolling in money it was a good deal for all. But over the last 30 years it has eliminated 70% of the union jobs, gave great raise to non-union companies, and now it is concession time. Now the Airlines could follow the same path as the UAW and it would be great for 30% of those who still had jobs. This is also great for the non-ALPA airlines that would fly all the passengers when the ALPA pilots were on strike.If we want respect, our union should set a minimum salary for our most junior new hires. It is my opinion that is should be 50k to start either as the copilot of a 1900 or 747. THE union should not sign another contract where the pay is below that level....period.
Oh and the guy is right about wearing the uniform and running on time.
gofaster
Here is how the UAW does it; they reach a deal with a single company, then go to the next company and say match it or you will be shutdown and all the new cars being sold will be built someplace else, then they go to the next company and repeat. When the auto companies where rolling in money it was a good deal for all. But over the last 30 years it has eliminated 70% of the union jobs, gave great raise to non-union companies, and now it is concession time. Now the Airlines could follow the same path as the UAW and it would be great for 30% of those who still had jobs. This is also great for the non-ALPA airlines that would fly all the passengers when the ALPA pilots were on strike.
But the results are the same if you put your company in a non-competitive position through work action, you will be at a disadvantage in the market.Again..... you neglect to discuss the RLA.