Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just curious if Delta, Inc. would have gone along with a flow? My guess is no, but the union never proposed it, so who knows?
Thank God we didn't get a flowthrough in 2000....Flowthroughs are mainly job protection for the mainline folks when the furloughs happen....
How many mainline pilots have been hired in the past 10 years? What is the DOH of the junior UAL,NWA,AMR pilot? You got your flowback now with Compass and Mesaba.....
Just curious if Delta, Inc. would have gone along with a flow? My guess is no, but the union never proposed it, so who knows?
As Puffdriver writes, I think this looks ugly for Comair.
Delta can't get out of its other RJ contracts (and yet keeps signing more contracts for the big RJ's)
I know that Compass had an arrangement but I was not aware of any flow-through arrangement with Mesaba. Do they really have one?
Plug, Sir, you still don't get it. The RJDC was never about "no scope." If anything the RJDC would have made scope tighter by restricting these airplanes that Delta negotiated to outsource.
First, a staple job would have kept the flying on the Delta list. That push failed BEFORE the formation of the RJDC.
The RJDC was a response to ALPA telling the ASA pilots that they could not negotiate a contract with the principle of their business who had operational control of the airline. ASA was not allowed to contract with Delta.
The RJDC won that point. ALPA changed it's policy and today ASA has a contract with it's owners and Comair has a contract with Delta.
Sure the RJDC would have liked to see these airplanes restricted to ASA and Comair, but, to make it sound like they wanted unlimited outsourcing is completely wrong. They wanted to stop outsourcing.
There are some Mesaba pilots on the NWA list proposal. I have not heard they will be treated any differently.It will be interesting to see how the flowup Mesaba and Compass people will be treated.....
Sure, there could have been an industry leading flow through. Unfortunately, the RJDC along with both MECs had NO leadership. Their greed and feigned leverage led to the downfall of any kind of workable, realistic solution. Now, the junior Comair pilots are paying a heavy price, and it looks as if the junior ASA pilots will follow suit.
Too bad that the senior RJDC pilots controlling the agenda didn't REALLY practice what they preached. Abysmal failure.
There are some Mesaba pilots on the NWA list proposal. I have not heard they will be treated any differently.
There were some NWA mainline poolies that concerns were expressed about. I think the "flow up" pilots are probably in a better position than those hired by NWA and awaiting a class date.
Eventually there will be upwards movement - demographics tells you that. Mesaba and Compass are the two best entry jobs in the business. Mesaba, Compass and SkyWest have two year pilots holding lines in 90 (76) seaters.
Eventually there will be upwards movement - demographics tells you that. Mesaba and Compass are the two best entry jobs in the business. Mesaba, Compass and SkyWest have two year pilots holding lines in 90 (76) seaters.
Hmmm, I had not ever heard a flow through concept made it that far. I thought it got killed by some rather insensitive remarks by ASA's then MEC Chair in a meeting with C. Giambusso.Your right, RJDC was all about scope, so long as it included ASA and CMR. My point is, where does it stop? What about the Mesa pilots, CHQ pilots, etc.? Where is the line?
In 2002 some of us at ASA still thought we had a play and we went around with information on that. Furloughed Delta pilots come down and fly our equipment, if they so desire, at their Delta DOH and in turn all ASA pilots be stapled to the bottom of the Delta list when vacancies there occur if the they so desire. Therefore those who wanna go can go and those who don't simply don't and the slot goes on to the next pilot. If this had occured the Delta pilots may have been willing to include ASA in their scope, not merge but include, therefore making sure that their own would have something to fly. It's a glorified flow-through, yes, but it was something. Instead some hard core RJDC folks didn't like this because scope was predatory and needed to be abolished all together and they should have a number at Delta.
Fins, you are a smart guy, I know, but the core of the followers of the RJDC that sent money loyally every month were in it for one reason, a number at Delta.
Cheers
Scope should never be about the "size" of an aircraft....It should include all members of the bargaining group to fly said flying in whatever size aircraft is appropriate.........
Since when has ASA ALPA ever been a member of the DAL ALPA bargaining group.
The RJDC was all about gutting the contractual protections which prevent unlimited outsourcing. It was all in the relief section of the frivolous lawsuit filed by Ford and his cronies.
Plug, that's the plan. To quote Bryan LaBreque "longevity is killing this airline." Without scope, these guys will go through cycles where they die as their costs get high. Once everyone turns over they will be the new low cost competitor with new pilots.Man, how times have changed for the Mesaba pilots. Two years ago they were about to go the way of the do-do bird and now it is considered one of the top regionals.
Hmmm, I had not ever heard a flow through concept made it that far. I thought it got killed by some rather insensitive remarks by ASA's then MEC Chair in a meeting with C. Giambusso.
I like your idea and in fact, the Delta guys who came over where some really excellent pilots with great attitudes.
Ultimately, it was up to ALPA and Representatives of the respective airlines. I'd have drawn the line at wholly owned carriers represented by ALPA.
While I don't like flow through agreements in principle, I like forming bridges. IMHO we made a mistake by not trying to staple the wholly owned ALPA carriers in the DAL/NWA merger. If the Compass deal works out as a way to get them on the list, I'll be happy.
Instead we've really opened a pandora's box with the NWA scope. I'm concerned about the codeshare with MidWest being used, as well as Alaska, to virtually outsource DC9's, MD88's and 737 sized jets.
This same operator, Republic, will be flying Delta passengers with non-permitted aircraft.
Worse, he threw a grenade at the Delta furloughed guys and that will not be forgotten.... Saw it again just last week.I agree and disagree. The CMR MEC had no leadership as JC was a flop. It was the line pilots at CMR that fought the good fight in 2000 and it was JC that stepped on their collective wankers. ASA had a hard-core unionist as it's MEC chair.
Delta can't get out of its other RJ contracts (and yet keeps signing more contracts for the big RJ's)
Back in 2002 myself and some other pilots put together a petition in that we put in folks v-files stating what we thought would be a good system for securing DCI flying ASA. It involved what I wrote before and some vocal senior pilots pooh-poohed it during an LEC 112 meeting. It may not have been perfect but it would have been something.
Worse, he threw a grenade at the Delta furloughed guys and that will not be forgotten.... Saw it again just last week.
He tried to play the brotherhood card, then stabbed people in the back.
I still have my "we support you sticker" the CMR MEC sent the same weekend they entered bargaining to try to undercut ASA.
As I recall the lawsuit asked for a renegotiation of CY2000 scope with Delta, ASA and Comair's Reps at the table. I'm pretty sure of that.You would have drawn the line at the wholly-owned airlines? Wouldn't that exclude and fly in the face of the lawsuit?