~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
There you have it.~~~^~~~ said:Rumors from Family Awareness dinner ..... Further, our P2P are finally admitting the obvious, that airplanes are being transferred to SkyWest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There you have it.~~~^~~~ said:Rumors from Family Awareness dinner ..... Further, our P2P are finally admitting the obvious, that airplanes are being transferred to SkyWest.
Further, our P2P are finally admitting the obvious, that airplanes are being transferred to SkyWest.
cbrown1 said:I'm just questioning how people can see this as obvious? The Atlanta crj700 seniority list shows that 80 captains and 80 f/os (or however many there are in slc) are being added after the SLC closure. So like I said before I have yet to see anything in black and white that says 'We are losing our 13 airplanes'. I do however see that they are coming back to atlanta.
~~~^~~~ said:Rumors Further, our P2P are finally admitting the obvious, that airplanes are being transferred to SkyWest.
cbrown1 said:I'm just questioning how people can see this as obvious? The Atlanta crj700 seniority list shows that 80 captains and 80 f/os (or however many there are in slc) are being added after the SLC closure. So like I said before I have yet to see anything in black and white that says 'We are losing our 13 airplanes'. I do however see that they are coming back to atlanta.
scarlet said:we all are not opposed to flying both aircraft.. As long as we are paid for flying the 70 seat flights.. IF you are some what senior your QOL would be better !! And I know ALPA here says IT IS NOT SAFE, but then most companies out there flies differences in aircraft..CAL, Southwest,DAL,etc.
Lets just get it done !! both sides are as crazy as the next !!
As in 2006., I am voting people out of the positions they are in, we need new people in office, and in this union !!
Bizjet said:We are not opposed to flying both aircraft? Who is included in your "WE"? Are you going to run for office or are you just one of those who is unhappy with anyone who serves? If you don't want to do it are you one of those who just don't like or respect those that have stepped up to the plate and served?
scarlet said:As in 2006., I am voting people out of the positions they are in, we need new people in office, and in this union !!
GreatView said:I too am not opposed to it....as long as 70 seat flying is paid as 70 seat flying. I love how ALPA calls it a safety issue when many other carriers fly common type aircraft who are represented by the exact same union. And, if you think it is UNSAFE, how do you feel about our brave military pilots who fly other a/c types (completely different without a common thread of similiarity) and also fly with us.
My point here is that it ISN'T unsafe, it's just a bargaining chip.....That's all...nothing else....