Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Publishers said:Let's take a more specific situation and one I am aware of. We ahve a retired captain from a major airline who is 61 years old. He would like to stay busy and even enjoy exploring some aspects of aviation that he had not spent any time in. For arguments sake, he was in the $250,000 range at XYZ airline. Did nothing but international heavy aircraft flying.
He comes in and says,,,, look, I am going to get my own XYZ type and would like to work here. Obviously I am not paying $250,000 and he indicates he would start at the low end of the spectrum just to help out.
G100driver said:I have no problem with 60 year old flying airplanes. Let me be clear about that. It is about people using their affluence to gain favor with prospective employers who could otherwise afford to fly an airplane.
81Horse said:This won't be much of a problem in the future then, will it? 'Cause airline retirees will need that paycheck just as much as everyone else.
Publishers said:OK but:
1. The millionaire is not buying the type rating. The airline guy is buying it so he would be competitive for positions with 135 or corporate operations. There are plenty others out there with ratings available for the jobs that exist.
2. There are a pile of airline ALPA memebers who like the pay but could not care less about organized labor. They are in a union because they had to be.
3. His family is doing very well thank you and on that issue he could work for free.
4. As stated above, I am sure he does not give a ___ what anyone thinks.
He is not offering to work for free and would be paid in the area of compensation that kind of equipment brings,,,, not to the level of experience he brings.
While everyone on these boards decries paying for your own training, the fact is that it is rare that we cannot find someone already rated for jobs. All these resumes show up from people with years of experience flying big aircraft, but, no rating in what corporate avaition or 135 charter companies fly. They ahve to take an aggressive stance or they will see their careers end. For most that I see that is the case. they send the resume like --here we are we have 50,000 hours in a 777 ,, please call.
Yesterday I interviewed someone who at 340TT was a F/O on 737-200 and then a 767 within a year with a major international carrier. Who is to say what is the right number, the right thing to do. Certainlynot anyone on these boards.
This person certainly would not donate a portion of his salary to the major he worked for to upgrade to 747-400, so why should he donate his money to individuals that can afford a multi-million dollar aircraft just so he does not feel as though he was put out to pasture?
Mach8Forest said:HawkerJet,
The pilots you are describing are not scabs.This industry and Alpo is in a spin and I don't see the working conditions or pay to get better any time soon. If you wonder what a real scab looks and acts like then look for your nearest member of APA !
G100driver said:Like I said before, if a person can afford and airplane he can afford to train pilots. I could really care less about 135 ect. You need pilots, train them. No free handouts. Congress can take care of that. Not professional pilots.
Ace-of-the-Base said:OK, 100, I'm with you most of the way, but this statement deserves some looking into.
How far does this go? If I can afford a jet, should I type rate the pilots? What if they have no jet time, should I get them the experience? What if they don't have an ATP, or enough total turbine to meet the insurance, should I provide that too? What defines a professional pilot? Is it a 1500 hour guy with a fresh ATP? Is it a guy with 10000 hours in jets, but not rated in the one that I own? Should I not lean toward hiring the guy that has 1000 hours and a type rating in the plane that I own?
What exactly does the owner owe to the 'professional pilot'? Why WOULDN'T he look for someone with a type rating and years of experience. I've seen posts on this board where pilots are actually mad when someone advertises a job and asks for a type or time in type. Heck, I'm a better Gulfstream pilot now than when I first got typed in it. Shouldn't an owner look for the best, safest pilot? Isn't total time and time in type part of that?
Now, answer every question
Ace
G100driver said:I am can deal with reality a little bit
Ace-of-the-Base said:I
But I must say, those of us that have gotten a great job in this 'horrible' time for pilots, don't seem to be calling 'sour grapes'. I'm dang good at what I do, I have a good attitude, and people have hired me and payed my wage. Pretty simple. Good pilot + good attitude = good pay and good job.
Ace