I have thought about this. I'm fine with it. If this person wants to come talk to the pilots on here we can deal with it. Hopefully he can take the heat that will come his way.
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
- Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
- Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
- Share the passion for aviation
- Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun
CastofThousands
- Thread starter LAZYB
- Start date
- Watchers 28
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
- Invite your friends
- Share the passion of aviation
- Friendliest aviation community on the web
I have thought about this. I'm fine with it. If this person wants to come talk to the pilots on here we can deal with it. Hopefully he can take the heat that will come his way.
FLYLOW22
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Posts
- 2,382
Was his name Kevin?
No clue where B19 comes from or who the hell he is!!
I do know that he isn't the smartest tool in the shed!
FLYLOW22
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Posts
- 2,382
Must be a Kevin.
and where does Mr Kevin work???????
Does it really matter?
I don't agree with everything he posts, but he does at least think about things before he puts it on the board.
It seems that people like attacking him more than discussing pertinent topics.
The message board are normally very quiet until he post a message.
FLYLOW22
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Posts
- 2,382
Do a quick search and I bet you can find out.
He's a troll that is self admittedly never wrong, even when presented with undisputed fact. That is never healthy for a debate.
Agreed.
B-19 has been kicking their pompous union loving asses all over this board for quite some time. It has been quite impressive, actually. When you consider it is ONE against 20 to 30 or so regulars.
They have lost their argument with him and the furloughs (just heard from a NetJet pilot another is on the way) prove it. If B-19 continues on his streak, they will be opening the contract and that will be the final stake in their union loving hearts.
How bout them Unions! Surrender your silly argument....B-19 won! Get over it!
gunfyter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2002
- Posts
- 3,785
4 Sevens,
I am sorry. 19 is not correct. He is a misrepresenter of the facts:
19 declared certain things would occur because of the presence of Unions. This is eminently not the case.
Its like the democrats declaring disaster would strike because of George Bush and when Katrina hit saying ... " See we told you!"
Now when a large portion of your customers work in the NY financial industry which gets hit with a financial storm ... will those people let their homes go into foreclosure ... it will they return their Jets to a company that has a return policy similar to the Policy COSTCO has when I return an consumer electronics device?
Many of our passengers have suffered financial loss and therefore returned their planes. When this happens there is less demand for pilots. This is not related in any way shape or form to whether these pilots are union or non-union.
B-19 has never demonstrated how the union has anything to do with the need for reduction in force.
I am sorry. 19 is not correct. He is a misrepresenter of the facts:
19 declared certain things would occur because of the presence of Unions. This is eminently not the case.
Its like the democrats declaring disaster would strike because of George Bush and when Katrina hit saying ... " See we told you!"
Now when a large portion of your customers work in the NY financial industry which gets hit with a financial storm ... will those people let their homes go into foreclosure ... it will they return their Jets to a company that has a return policy similar to the Policy COSTCO has when I return an consumer electronics device?
Many of our passengers have suffered financial loss and therefore returned their planes. When this happens there is less demand for pilots. This is not related in any way shape or form to whether these pilots are union or non-union.
B-19 has never demonstrated how the union has anything to do with the need for reduction in force.
Last Tuesday.
imacdog
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Posts
- 4,196
Actually B hasn't been correct. He posts factual errors about the NJA contract and will not admit that he was incorrect. His reasoning that the union contract at NJA was responsible for furloughs has been disproven many times. He originally said that NJA would furlough more people in terms of % than the other companys, then later changed his "prediction" to total number of pilots. When I called him out on that, no response. Go figure.
So Mr smarty pants. Explain this to me. How is it the pilot unions fault for the wages obtained in the 2005 contract? The COMPANY had to also agree to this. What part of THE COMPANY HAD TO AGREE do you have such a hard time understanding?
LAZYB
Time wounds all heels.
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2001
- Posts
- 1,117
Share this page
Latest resources
-
-
-
-
-
AC 90-89C - Amateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing HandbookAmateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing Handbook
- Neal
- Updated:
