ASA Bad news is out.

[DirtySowf]

I just hope all my overweight Dallas commuters are safe. We need stronger contract language to protect these guys.

 

[JoeMerchant]

They can transfer all the flying they want, they just can't furlough anybody.

At some point, there will be a motivation for ASA to acquire more flying if Delta continues to reduce.

How do you propose that ASA simply "acquire more flying"? Do you really believe they haven't been trying? How would you "acquire more flying"?

 

[johnpeace]

How do you propose that ASA simply "acquire more flying"? Do you really believe they haven't been trying? How would you "acquire more flying"?

In one of the threads where we were talking about all of the recent RAH acquisitions, someone mentioned Skywest buying UAL (or enough of it to effect policy there).

Buying UAL and replacing a big chunk of their domestic flying with Skywest/ASA RJs would be a pathway toward 'acquire more flying'.

Then again, UAL is toxic enough that I don't expect Skywest's shrewd investors to want to have anything to do with it. Eventually though, they'll have to consider that taking no action at all will probably result in the destruction of Skywest's biggest customer.

 

[JoeMerchant]

In one of the threads where we were talking about all of the recent RAH acquisitions, someone mentioned Skywest buying UAL (or enough of it to effect policy there).

Buying UAL and replacing a big chunk of their domestic flying with Skywest/ASA RJs would be a pathway toward 'acquire more flying'.

Then again, UAL is toxic enough that I don't expect Skywest's shrewd investors to want to have anything to do with it. Eventually though, they'll have to consider that taking no action at all will probably result in the destruction of Skywest's biggest customer.

That may be a possiblity down the road, but it needs to be done based on the basis of a good business decision....I don't think that is what sweptback had in mind when he implied that they can just "acquire more flying"....If it makes good financial sense, I'm sure Jerry is looking at it....

 

[outtahere]

I don't wish a furlough on anyone, but I see Skywest 200's in atl now everyday. They are flying in and out of cvg with 200's. Not to mention all of the 900's! Everything we hear at ASA is we will be doing the flying on the east, and skywest in the west. Well now skywest is in the east and west, and we are only in the east and furloughing. So, why is skywest not sharing in the pain? Sure they can't take our planes due to our cba, but they can take our flying and we have no option other than to furlough. Things are bad right now, and I understand the need to furlough, but if skywest is shifting flying to prevent there own group from furloughing at our expense then that is a serious problem with serious consequenses to the pilot morale here at asa. When morale goes south, so does performance, and then our delta contract is at risk, which will cost Inc alot more money than the possibility of a union at skywest.

 

[777_Jackpot]

In one of the threads where we were talking about all of the recent RAH acquisitions, someone mentioned Skywest buying UAL (or enough of it to effect policy there).

Buying UAL and replacing a big chunk of their domestic flying with Skywest/ASA RJs would be a pathway toward 'acquire more flying'.

Then again, UAL is toxic enough that I don't expect Skywest's shrewd investors to want to have anything to do with it. Eventually though, they'll have to consider that taking no action at all will probably result in the destruction of Skywest's biggest customer.

You've hit the nail on the head. With the obvious uncertainty with the future revenues from UAL (see article below) in question. I could easily see SKYW just waiting for Tilton to have absolutely no further options but to except some sort of cash for control infusion from SKYW to secure more flying for INC. The only variable is how long they will have to hold out for that time to come. This would be almost the same as what Republic has done to secure more revenue/flying.

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/article.pl?articleId=32164

 

[XPOO]

Just to let you all know, it isn't all rainbows and sunshine over here at SKW, either. Just an observation from my side, and I may be wrong, but we seem to be a little more flexible over here in helping give the company what it needs to keep from seeing too many lose their jobs.

However, lately, we have lost almost 400 people in SLC due to Delta taking over. We have lost numerous agents in the mountain west cities due to Comair taking over. Many people are being dispaced as the EMBs quickly fade out of the UAL system. Many of our DL livery aircraft have been turned into generics and thrown in the UAL system and are flying at-risk now. We have a constant rotation of 8 aircraft in c-check nowadays. We have the impending doom of what to do with the people/aircraft from the Midwest program. Everything may look hunky-dorey over here, but its not.

And not one of us at SKW feel any better about what's going on here when we have to read bad news such as yours.

This company does its best to look out for its employees, what we all need to remember is that we need to return that favor as well. We all need to show up, excede expectations, and it will make things easier on everyone. I fully believe that.

 

[Papa Woody]

No one, except a fool, sells a Cash Cow!

Delta sold ASA

 

[Papa Woody]

So, why is skywest not sharing in the pain?

Relax!

United is probably going to be liquidated within the year.

Pain comin' to a Skywest near you!

 

[CFI2766]

Relax!

United is probably going to be liquidated within the year.

Pain comin' to a Skywest near you!

This depends on fuel prices. Potentially by the end of the year, but not a given, by any stretch.

Now, if fuel doubles overnight, say, with a shooting war in IRAN, then there will be multiple carriers going T/U in the near future.