FD109
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2002
- Posts
- 68
Re: Score FD109 4 Turbo 0
Boeingman,
I agree with almost everything you said. I'll tell you the one minor point of disagreement we have in just a minute.
A few months before the strike I had one of the CAL guys who was consulting with us on my jumpseat out of ATL to IAH. Needless to say, he said just what you said about not leaving the cockpit and that is one of the reasons I voted NO to honoring the IAM picket line.
(Just in case, everyone understand that though I voted NO, I complied with the majority vote and did not, and would never, cross the line.)
Eastern's pilots naively thought that the situation was so obvious, and that the case against Lorenzo was so compelling that people would rally to our support if we could bring the situation to a head. We never dreamed in our wildest nightmares that so many off-the-street SCABS would rush to MIA to take our jobs and help Lorenzo keep things going.
We thought that we would be able to shut it down so completely that a bankruptcy judge would appoint a trustee, we would all immediately go back to work, the world would be wonderful, and we would all fly happily until we were 60. The only thing any of us wanted to do was save OUR company, and I honestly think we could have were it not for the SCABs. But they were there and I guess they always will be.
I hope you guys and girls who are reading this stuff will learn from our naive, if well intentioned, mistakes.
The one place I disagree with you is regarding the SCABS feelings about themselves. After EAL I was both a Director of Operations and Chief Pilot at two other airlines.
I interviewed a lot of SCABS and hired some of them, but you could see it in their faces when you talked to them about it. They know what they did, and what they are, and have no respect for themselves. It was funny to see the beads of sweat break out on their foreheads when they realized I was on the outside watching them while they SCABBED Eastern and that now getting a job depended on me!!!
Except for the fact that I could never trust them, when they worked for me I treated them no differently from any other pilot. I even helped defend one from an FAA action and saved his license. We were repaid for this when he failed to show up for a trip about six months later. When scheduling called his home to find out where he was, we were told that he had started school with a major a few days before. He could have at least told us he was leaving; we would have wished him well.
Oh well, a SCAB will always be a SCAB.
Regarding Bavis: I don't recall that he was replaced, but he was overruled. ALPA national also recommended in August 1989 that we go back to work. This was about the time the congressional bill was being voted on and most of us didn't want to give up at that point. We should have, but hindsight is always 20/20.
Boeingman,
I agree with almost everything you said. I'll tell you the one minor point of disagreement we have in just a minute.
A few months before the strike I had one of the CAL guys who was consulting with us on my jumpseat out of ATL to IAH. Needless to say, he said just what you said about not leaving the cockpit and that is one of the reasons I voted NO to honoring the IAM picket line.
(Just in case, everyone understand that though I voted NO, I complied with the majority vote and did not, and would never, cross the line.)
Eastern's pilots naively thought that the situation was so obvious, and that the case against Lorenzo was so compelling that people would rally to our support if we could bring the situation to a head. We never dreamed in our wildest nightmares that so many off-the-street SCABS would rush to MIA to take our jobs and help Lorenzo keep things going.
We thought that we would be able to shut it down so completely that a bankruptcy judge would appoint a trustee, we would all immediately go back to work, the world would be wonderful, and we would all fly happily until we were 60. The only thing any of us wanted to do was save OUR company, and I honestly think we could have were it not for the SCABs. But they were there and I guess they always will be.
I hope you guys and girls who are reading this stuff will learn from our naive, if well intentioned, mistakes.
The one place I disagree with you is regarding the SCABS feelings about themselves. After EAL I was both a Director of Operations and Chief Pilot at two other airlines.
I interviewed a lot of SCABS and hired some of them, but you could see it in their faces when you talked to them about it. They know what they did, and what they are, and have no respect for themselves. It was funny to see the beads of sweat break out on their foreheads when they realized I was on the outside watching them while they SCABBED Eastern and that now getting a job depended on me!!!
Except for the fact that I could never trust them, when they worked for me I treated them no differently from any other pilot. I even helped defend one from an FAA action and saved his license. We were repaid for this when he failed to show up for a trip about six months later. When scheduling called his home to find out where he was, we were told that he had started school with a major a few days before. He could have at least told us he was leaving; we would have wished him well.
Oh well, a SCAB will always be a SCAB.
Regarding Bavis: I don't recall that he was replaced, but he was overruled. ALPA national also recommended in August 1989 that we go back to work. This was about the time the congressional bill was being voted on and most of us didn't want to give up at that point. We should have, but hindsight is always 20/20.
Last edited: