Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What made Eastern GO Under?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Tim47SIP said:
A little off of the subject but you stated something that made me wonder.

LOL, but reading publishers posts, you must take into account that many people think like him. The people who view crossing a picket line blasphemous (sp) are becoming fewer and fewer.

Do you really believe this today? Back when all of the Scabs became Scabs, there wasn't really allot known as to the repercussions concerning their actions. Today, everyone knows what will happen to your career if you become a scab. The only individuals who I believe would cross in today’s environment would be people who wanted to just get time to go work somewhere other than a major.

Personally, I would leave the business before crossing any picket line whether I agreed with the whys or not. I know of no one who would cross but I know of a whole lot of people who would like to get rid of ALPA. So even if the consensus is mad at the union, I don't think you’ll get great numbers of crossers.

What are your or anyone’s thoughts concerning this. Thanks.

I absolutely believe that more today than in 83. Especially in this economic and industry climate. Not discounting your ideals, but for many talk is cheap. Some who crossed stunned me and there were those who stayed out I never would have guessed. You never know who will back you until it is all over.

In 83, a lot was known about he consequences of crossing a picket line, yet at CAL, they came in droves. There were many former ALPA pilots who were new hires at CAL. They, along with the old CAL guys who crossed knew exactly what they were getting in to. Not that it bothered them in the least. I have always asked but no one can answer. Why are so many ex ALPA pilots on the CAL scab list?

Most of the former ALPA pilots who came were bitter at ALPA and didn't give a dang about the scab list or being blackballed. Today we see ALPA disenfranchising many younger pilots and getting a bad taste in their mouths about the mainline vs. regional divide. Either real or perceived.

Your last sentence is very prophetic. We felt the same way as did the EAL pilots I’m sure. We had the same belief that no one would cross our line. We were sorely mistaken. Those who attempt a strike now are in my opinion insane. I think the Comair pilots were very lucky management didn't try to operate.

Another mistake is to assume these guys are inferior in their abilities. I know that for a select few, especially on this board, that notion soothes some resentment. In reality it is not true. Having flown with these guys at CAL for years, I can safely say that they are no worse or better on average than any other pilot. In fact, during the strike, weak sisters were fired with no union protection so the ones who stayed were pretty sharp.

I hope that answers your question.
 
Last edited:
enigma said:
Good post. It is this fact that makes me take the time to engage him. I'm stupid enough to think that I might actually affect some change in the way people like him think about professional pilots.

regards,
8N

LOL. There will always be a chasim between those who aspire/or are in management vs. the line grunt.

I've beaten my head agaisnt the wall with some over our pilots at CAL as well. Believe it or not, many very strong ALPA supporters are on the "list".
 
Re: last time

publisher said:
I think that it was doomed because there were a bunch of people who did not want it saved. ]


Now there's a specific answer!

"I think ythat [sic] the IAM situation, not the pilot situation made it extremely unattractive on top of weak financials, debt load, fleet, etc."

A little more specific, Publisher, but not much.

Eastern had problems. No question about that, but with the huge resources the company also had, the problems could have been overcome by competent management. Even Lorenzo said that in the bankruptcy filing.

As yet, you have neither suggested nor documented anything to show that Eastern's problems were insurmountable.


"You guys think Bush was out to help Lorenzo, I think that he was more pressured by the other airline ceo's to leave this alone than to help Lorenzo. They wanted Eastern to die.

I'm glad you are finally admitting that Bush took an active part in the destruction of EAL!

We're probably both correct as to his reasons, but Bush's connections to Lorenzo are too well documented and too obvious to ignore. Bush "left alone" the appointment of a PEB, but he took an active part by vetoing legislation that could have saved EAL.


"The only thing that made the bankruptcy court mad is that Lorenzo pillaged and left little for them except debt and obligations. Not their job to determine who is fit and not fit.

I don't know if the bankruptcy court was mad or not, but, don't forget, the bankruptcy court DID declare Lorenzo "unfit to reorganize this estate" when they booted him out.

Unfortunately, the court booted him a year too late because Lorenzo had enough SCABs to help him keep it running for that year while he stripped as much from the assets as possible.

Publisher, I'm proud of you! Though you've still failed to back up any of your arguments, or present any documented specifics, you've come a long way.

(1) You've admitted that George H. W. Bush was directly involved in Eastern's demise, and

(2) You've virtually admitted that Lorenzo was the last, and proximate cause of Eastern's death.

Now, if you'll re-examine you position on SCABs.
 
Last edited:
Typhoon

It is easy to say you will not cross a line when it is your union striking over what you feel is a fair issue.

The hard part is to stay out when you know that the whole thing is a pissing contest between one giant ego and another giant ego. Has nothing to do with you and will probably result in you losing everything.

What we seem to be arguing about is what the alternative to Lorenzo was. I say no one showed up. I say that there were more people in favor of letting it go down than keeping it up.

I think Bush wanted no part of this crap and left Lorenzo on his own to the appreciation of the other major management who wanted the airline to fail. Frankly I don't think you even thought of this probablility until I mentioned it.

I still do not think Lorenzo was the cause of anything. He was doing exactly what one should think he could do. Ok, they labelled him unfit.. Sure they did, he was not there to do anything except pillage. He has been involved in other airlines.

Did he care if he was labelled unfit, not really.

The part you seem so reluctant to see is that it does not make any difference unless someone showed up that was there to rebuild Eastern. You can talk about Peter U but really, he was just another pillage guy with no background in this at all.

People seem to think that I support scabs because in this case I think that there was no logic to this situation. I really do not know or care what the facts were at CAL or any other situation.

I have no interest in being in a union so obviously I have no feel for it and have never worked for a hourly pay check. I took a bunch of ex Eastern pilots down with me to Africa and they had no interest in getting shot at so there you go. Different strokes for different folks.

You can give me all the facts that you want to. At Evergreen we had planes that were painted in the postal service colors but they were not their's.

You or someone else was right about Comair. They did not try to operate. But, every minute since then, Delta has been taking steps to see that this never happens to them again. The other majors have started to divest their regionals. They will not say that this is a result of the strike but it is.

Enron, Worldcom, Arthur Anderson and others reported massive profits some years back. It was crap/ The paper lied.

Do you think anyone was going to come out in the press and say we are not interested in Eastern because their IAM union management are a bunch of you know whats and we think that theri maintenance people are incompetant boobs.

Get a life Typhoon. this is obviously more important to you than me.
 
We need an agent

Publisher,

After reading your reply to typhoon and your last one to me, something suddenly occured to me--I had a flash of insight.

Have you ever seen Pat Buchanan and Bill Press' show on CNN? If you haven't, they discuss and debate various issues with Buchanan representing the right and Press representing the left.

You and I need to get a good agent and approach CNN, or some other cable network, about a similar program. I still think you are full of crap and I'm sure you feel the same about me, but at least with our very own television program we could turn our personal crap coefficients into something from which we could make some money.

If you are interested, have your people contact my people, and we'll do lunch to talk about it.

Regards,

FD109

Hey guys: In response to a private message I just received--I'm joking and at the same time trying to make the point that we sometimes take ourselves and our points of view too seriously. It was a Joke for heavens sake; I don't really think CNN would talk to either Publisher or me.
 
Last edited:
FD109

Well there is one that you are definitely wrong on.

I appear on and advise CNN on aviation matters. In short, I have my part of the gig, get your own.
 
Re: FD109

publisher said:
Well there is one that you are definitely wrong on.

I appear on and advise CNN on aviation matters. In short, I have my part of the gig, get your own.

Oh God help us, you are one of the media's so called "Aviation Experts"

This explains a whole lot!!!!!
 
Re: Typhoon

Originally posted by publisher
Get a life Typhoon.
Wow, real mature. What year of high school are you in?

Look, what happened at Eastern is--I imagine--a lot like the break-up of a family. It may not be important to you, but it was immensely important to me...and when someone like you comes along with a grossly distorted view of what happened, it's easy to take it personally.

Get a life? I'm an airline captain, flying a jet. I have a loving wife, a beautiful baby boy, and another one on the way. I don't owe anything on my house or my car, and I'm holding a reasonable line. I've got a life. Arguing with management toadies like you is just a hobby. :D

See you on CNN!
 
Re: FD109

publisher said:
Well there is one that you are definitely wrong on.

I appear on and advise CNN on aviation matters. In short, I have my part of the gig, get your own.

Is anyone else tired of hearing some private pilot "expert" on the news spouting his mouth off about a subject they have very little experience in?

Publisher, next time you are on TV please tell America you are not an Airline pilot, you just play one on TV..
 
Last edited:
Publisher and the Media

Oh my gosh!!!!

I was trying to make a funny joke by proposing some sort of media thing with Publisher. That was before I fully realized what a joke Publisher really was. I withdraw my offer; my people have been advised to refuse calls from his people!

Publisher an advisor to CNN on aviation matters??!!?? If that's true, I'm appalled.

I'm going to offer myself to CNN as a technical expert on brain surgery; after all, I'm at least as qualified to advise the media on brain surgery as Publisher is to advise them on aviation.
 
Last edited:
FD109,

In all fairness, he can't possibly be any worse than that worthless boob, Robert Hager on NBC.

In all seriousness, if publisher was really an analyst, who "appeared and advised on CNN", he would tell us who he is. He would want us to know all the tidbits of info he spouts to the viewing public came from him.

So who are you publisher? If you are so proud of your cable network talking head status, tell us all about it. If nothing else, your previous appearances on CNN will give us a myriad of topics to discuss.

Fess up...
 
Pub,

That is disturbing, could you please list your qualifications for that job. You appear not to have flown many airliners, so I am not sure where your knowledge on large aircraft systems and 121 operations would come in. I THOUGHT you said you were never in managment so I am not sure where your managerial background in aviation managment would come in handy.

If you are being serious I would like to know what exactly you ADVISE them on..

AAflyer,

P.S. On positive note, your posts always seem to surprise me, and others give me a little laughter to brighten my day.:rolleyes
 
Re: Typhoon

publisher said:

I took a bunch of ex Eastern pilots down with me to Africa and they had no interest in getting shot at so there you go. Different strokes for different folks.

You can give me all the facts that you want to. ...

Publisher,

You have both told us and demonstrated repeatedly that facts and documentation (see your previous posts) are not among your strong points, but can you please explain the quotations above.

(1) Just who was shooting at the ex-Eastern pilots you took to Africa? I personally would have no interest in that myself.

Is being shot at something you enjoy? If so, have you told CNN about this?

(2) Does that second paragraph mean what it sounds like it means: That you have made up your mind and don't want to be confused by facts.

And another thing, IF a bunch of ex-Eastern pilots were traveling with you, I wonder who they were? That might explain a lot.
 
AAflyer,

He is highly qualified per his profile. 1650 hours in multiple private, corporate, and commercial aircraft. Of course I could be reading that wrong. Perhaps that is just his inverted flight time. Or maybe his time inside the FAF. ;)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom