Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What has ALPA done for me lately?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Now I understand the inherent benefit of an independent, in-house union.

When the pilots on the property (as opposed to those hundreds of miles away) decide for themselves to waive their rights, then don't like the way things turn out...they won't be able to sue the rest of us!

The circle of suspects shrinks a bit.

I like it!

Open issues:

1. Are all of us ready for some personal accountability? (Any East/West USAirways guys wanna weigh-in here? AA/TWA?)

2. Is it a good thing to have our freeway underpasses clogged with refrigerator boxes full of homeless tort lawyers?
 
fd, occum, pcl.

I am done discussing this issue. Let it drop and we shall see if the suit has any merit.
You all obviously have your opinion and no logic will change your mind.
Fly safe and have a great Thanksgiving.

I don't think there is logic to change minds.....

Well....at least those in favor of the lawsuit have failed to present logic....
 
So the modern day airline industry doesn't match up to your grandpa's standards... DC-3 speeds can't keep up with a turbojet?

Obviously the comparison was intentionally disregarded but you know what I meant. ALPA of the past in their time is nothing like the politically fueled, backstabbing , money grubbing organization it has become today. Comments rife with sanctimonious, impious and sarcastic rhetoric from those like yourself only push this image deeper and deeper into those coming on board the industry today.

Two things.... Only the President gets a salary, and that salary is determined by the ALPA BOD, which is elected by every ALPA pilot... usually, these elections have a minority particaption rate...of 30% so who do we really need to look at?

The leadership has to ask why participation rates have dropped off the cliff. Really pretty simple in my opinion.

The other three ALPA officers get their airlines pay, basically....and they have taken deep cuts as you know.. including thier pension.


Wow..they still have a pension.

In addition, any expenes that the ALPA national officers incur (or any ALPA volunteer actually) are subject to IRS taxes. So, if I give up a day off and do ALPA work and I expense a lunch meal, then I have to pay tax on that expense as if it was income. Nice IRS...huh...


I’m sure Prater is struggling with that $10,000 a month expense allocation

The problem is people like you focus on misinformation like ALPA national salaries... and you create a negative stigma that is based on false data... how productive is that?

Misinformation? Ignoring public data and minimizing it's effect on the membership makes you part of the problem.

Sorry... nice try... the only thing Prater said was he'd take a pay cut if the BOD mandated it..

Absolutely false. Besides, if any of these guys really wanted to restore some integrity to the union they wouldn’t rely on the crutch and excuse of “the BOD determines my salary”. They certainly could forfeit it on their own. How about donating the excess to PAC? What about Charity?

Who would be doing the political hacking and backstabbing? Your fellow pilots at an LEC meeting?

You really are too far gone to accept the reality of the ALPA backroom network today. If you want o keep your delusions of grandeur I can not help you. All the while ALPA will continue to lose more of the hearts and minds of pilots daily. Again, I point to the failed Skywest organization as an perfect example. Not only in the loss but the stunning defeat for ALPA. It wasn't even close.

Aren't you really saying that this whole self reliance and responsibility for your own airline career is really a bit too troublesome...or that you don't have the energy? The fact is there are some really cool sit coms on TV that you'd rather watch.. or maybe something else?

Now I will have to mention again why there is such low participation nowadays. Read the first paragraph RezO

Nice try again... dump it on the leadership.... that way you won't have to accept responsbility for your career. You won't have to hone your political skill to deal with your political career.

Yes, blame It on the membership again. Do you ever see a pattern here?

Who really wonders if they will be politically effective in thier career while learning how to fly? Who would have known that once you got the job that you have to work to keep it and to make it better.

Who would have known that we would be paying dues to an organization that really does not represent the best interests of the entire membership?

I am not sure if it has sunk into you membership people that it is YOUR career. Quit dumping all the repsonsbility of YOUR career onto volunteers. We are trying to do the best we can but when you don't give a SH*T until it is too late and then complain that we didn't read your minds it gets real old..real quick.

I know what you mean about statements and comments getting old. Do us all a favor and let somebody else do the volunteering with your general attitude. You may do good work but your attitude and placement of blame does far more damage than good by alienating those that cast a weary eye on your actual work.

Look man...

“Man”? Are you dense?

I am tired of defending the Association to its own members. I get more respect from Congressmen, the FAA and others than I do from my own people.

Yet you still don’t realize why you have to actually do that do you? I think you need to take a good hard look in the mirror. The answer is there it is just you keep choosing to disregard it.

Who needs to wake up?

You do. Along with the elected leadership.

The 5% attendance rate at LEC meetings?
The 30% voter participation rate in LEC election?
The 30% participation rate in the AGE 60 survey.

Still can’t figure out why the low participation can you?

Sorry.. but membership involvement is way to weak and low for you to try and attempt to blame the volunteer leadership.

Where did I blame the volunteers? You sound like a lunatic at times with your misnomers and hyperbole replies towards what people write. I think half the time pilots on here just ignore your continuing fulsome writings because the summary of your messages is you have nothing actually legitimate to say.


You mean with family and a full time flight schedule, I volunteer to make this profession better, the mebership does sqaut....and it is..... get this........are you ready...... here it comes...... its.......MY FAULT.... that your career doesn't meet YOUR expectations....


Save the woe be to me speech and continued haranguing as I commend the volunteers. My problem of ALPA today is the structure, political insulation of leadership and like it or not the insulting salaries paid to the brass. However volunteers like yourself, as I said before, do more harm than good with your attitude about participation, blame and fault. Somewhere you have intentionally blurred the lines of many with their feelings today towards ALPA. You always try to turn it into a problem with the membership and attacks on volunteers within the organization.

If you paid your G-pa and Dad for your ALPA education... I suggest you get your money back... and give it to ALPA-PAC...

I would kick you right t in the nutsack for that comment you arrogant little toad however in reality one must consider the source. Besides, I probably wouldn’t hit anything anyway as someone obviously eviscerated it long ago and nothing is left.
 
Last edited:
OK Occam!

Not so fast genius. Litigants (at least in our case) will stay quiet so that info damaging to the other side does not inadvertently get into the wrong hands. Loose lips sink ships. If you have not figured it out yet, it would help the other side prep. We will not show our hand. Pretty simple if you think about it. And I hope that the documentation is so convincing as to bring apa/amr back into the fray.
Why are you and ual so bent on getting the gouge?

I'm pretty sure a lawsuit is a sufficient means to bear out some facts. We're gonna find out! This dude DOES need to cool it on here, but this is a good topic for this thread.

Maybe they have a bloody glove?

But, like all things "TWA", probably too little too late. Does anybody ever stop to think how close we all are to being a TWA?! Let's give them a little room to swing a cat.

Seriously Occam: If I've unfairly characterized you with regard to ALPA merger policy, let me know. Seems to me, that's the 800 pound gorilla in the room.

Do you really believe this TWA lawsuit could cost too much to run to ground?
 
Flopgut, since you're so concerned about changing the RLA, which I agree with you about, do you contribute to ALPA-PAC so we can get pro-labor politicians in office to make it happen?

No. I haven't since age 65 came to the forefront. I not proud of it, but I'm not ashamed either. I've talked to CAL's legislative affairs person several times in the last couple years. That has become the single over riding issue to anything done politically. Wrongly so and I won't give a cent to it. Changing retirement age will squander any chance we have to change the RLA, or anything else. And about the time PAC clout gets re-built, another bunch of a$$holes will want it changed again.
 
No. I haven't since age 65 came to the forefront. I not proud of it, but I'm not ashamed either. I've talked to CAL's legislative affairs person several times in the last couple years. That has become the single over riding issue to anything done politically. Wrongly so and I won't give a cent to it. Changing retirement age will squander any chance we have to change the RLA, or anything else. And about the time PAC clout gets re-built, another bunch of a$$holes will want it changed again.

You're withholding important PAC money because you disagree with a single issue? I disagreed with the change in policy on Age-60 also, but I continued to back the PAC because I understood the importance of other battles that ALPA was fighting on Capital Hill. Pension reform, flight/duty times, the Akaka amendment, flight deck security, etc.... are all issues that ALPA is currently dealing with, not to mention the huge issue of foreign control and ownership. Open skies has the ability to completely eliminate your career, yet you'll withhold PAC money because Age-65 will simply delay your seniority advancement? What good is Age-60 if some Mexican pilot working for peanuts is flying our flying? We need to prioritize. Notice that both Occam and I disagreed with ALPA's change in policy on Age-60, but we recognized the important of the PAC on other issues. We can't give up on the PAC because of a single issue.
 
The leadership has to ask why participation rates have dropped off the cliff. Really pretty simple in my opinion.

The problem with your argument is that participation rates haven't "dropped off the cliff," because they have always been this low. During the old days, participation rates where exactly the same. A couple of years ago ALPA did a study of participation rates by going through the old archives to see if things had changed. The results? Participation rates are the same now as they've always been in the Association. There hasn't been any drop off, pilots are just lazy and apathetic and always have been.
 
fd, occum, pcl.

You all obviously have your opinion and no logic will change your mind.

You might also consider the possibility that you presented no logical reason to change or minds.

Regardless, I hope you have a great Thanksgiving also.:)
 
Obviously the comparison was intentionally disregarded but you know what I meant. ALPA of the past in their time is nothing like the politically fueled, backstabbing , money grubbing organization it has become today. Comments rife with sanctimonious, impious and sarcastic rhetoric from those like yourself only push this image deeper and deeper into those coming on board the industry today.

Ok... tell me about ALPA of the past.. tell me about their golden days of effectiveness and membership having a positive liking to ALPA... examples please.. Dates, stories, etc...



The leadership has to ask why participation rates have dropped off the cliff. Really pretty simple in my opinion.

See PCL128's reply below... and my follow up.. in addition... so particaption rates are low...

AND?

it is still your career... as a professional airline pilot are you giving in to resignation? Have you no desire to become politically effective? If not... then why did you become an airline pilot? Didn't your G-pa and Dad tell you about LEC meetings, resolutions, voting, communication, etc?

Do you want to say... Why should I have to be politically effective in my career? I just want to show up, fly my trip and go home.. guess what sister...so do I.

I am sure millions of American GIs didn't want to go to Europe in the 1940's...but that is the way it was...

And this is the way it is... if you want to have an Airline Career you have to get involved!

Your choice: continue the status quo and be resentful and bitter or get involved and envoke positive change.




Wow..they still have a pension.

It is the exact same as any line pilot.




I’m sure Prater is struggling with that $10,000 a month expense allocation

Here..let me help...

Duane Woerth
President
Air Line Pilots

2006 Salary Breakdown
$ 20,901 Administrative (6%)$ 0 Contributions (0%)$ 278,676 General Overhead (80%)$ 24,384 Political (7%)$ 24,384 Representational (7%)
spacer.gif
$ 348,345 Total Earnings
spacer.gif
Historical Salary InformationYear Salary % Raise Title2006 $ 348,345 -0.8% President2005 $ 351,186 -15.4% President2004 $ 415,026 -2.0% President2002 $ 423,705 -3.5% President2001 $ 439,296 40.2% President2000 $ 313,392 — President




Dennis Dolan
First Vice-president
Air Line Pilots


2006 Salary Breakdown
$ 0 Administrative (47%)$ 0 Contributions (0%)$ 0 General Overhead (51%)$ 0 Political (0%)$ 0 Representational (2%)
spacer.gif
$ 0 Total Earnings
spacer.gif
Historical Salary InformationYear Salary % Raise Title2006 $ 0 — First Vice-president2005 $ 0 — First Vice-president2004 $ 0 — First Vp2002 $ 0 — First Vice Pres2001 $ 0 — First Vice Pres2000 $ 0 — First Vice Pres

You can see the difference between the President, the only ALPA national officer that gets a salary and the first VP. (from 2005-6)

Again.. the salary is determined by the BOD, the status reps at your airline that you probably didn't vote for. Mybe you think repsresentative democracy and voting is a sham? If so, what do you thinkof the US constitution?

Maintaining a presence is Washington DC is expensive. As you know from your ALPA history, Dave Behncke set up shop in Chicago, because he was a UAL pilot. But he was spending over 50% of his time in Wash DC... so he MOVED ALPA to DC...cause that is where the areana of play is... I hope that is ok with you?

We have gone over this over and over on this website.. do a search and get informed (cause you are not).. on how the salary structue works..

Finally, not everyone can be president of ALPA. It takes political skill to do so.... in addition why would someone volunteer to give up 15+ days off to work 6 to 7 days a week?

Misinformation? Ignoring public data and minimizing it's effect on the membership makes you part of the problem.

Wrong again! I am begining to think you got your ALPA education from the cockpits and crewrooms 'experts'....



Absolutely false. Besides, if any of these guys really wanted to restore some integrity to the union they wouldn’t rely on the crutch and excuse of “the BOD determines my salary”.

Ok... would you like to see the Resolutions? Or are they just facades?


They certainly could forfeit it on their own. How about donating the excess to PAC? What about Charity?

They already give to the PAC. Do you?

Charity begins at home.
 
You really are too far gone to accept the reality of the ALPA backroom network today. If you want o keep your delusions of grandeur I can not help you. All the while ALPA will continue to lose more of the hearts and minds of pilots daily. Again, I point to the failed Skywest organization as an perfect example. Not only in the loss but the stunning defeat for ALPA. It wasn't even close.


Translation: I never thought I had to work manage my career.. I just thought my career was mx free. Now that I am being called out and told to work to protect my own pay rates, work rules, 401k etc.. it doesn't sit well with me.. these are not my expectations.. I'd rather fight reality...


Now I will have to mention again why there is such low participation nowadays. Read the first paragraph RezO

At the end of the day it is still your career. What are you going to do? be mad or effective?

Yes, blame It on the membership again. Do you ever see a pattern here?

Who else should I blame your career on? Me?

Who would have known that we would be paying dues to an organization that really does not represent the best interests of the entire membership?

Agreed. With only 30% of the membership bothering to vote in career representation at ALPA LEC meetings, it is no wonder ALPA doesn't represent membership interests. I mean how can they..HOW can ALPA represent those who won't speak?

I know what you mean about statements and comments getting old. Do us all a favor and let somebody else do the volunteering with your general attitude. You may do good work but your attitude and placement of blame does far more damage than good by alienating those that cast a weary eye on your actual work.

The problem is MY career is effected by your angst and apathy... only we when are all effective can we effect change. ALPA isn't regulatory so we must have consensus... Did MLK jr effect change because he had gov't rule?

On May 17th in Wash DC there was a rally... only 100 ALPA pilots showed up. Where you there? And guess what.. the 100 pilots where the same ol' suspects.. the same ol elected pilots that keep showing and representing...why..cause the membership is too lazy to get off thier tails for thier OWN careers...

“Man”? Are you dense?

got it.... youre a chick.... does it matter?

Yet you still don’t realize why you have to actually do that do you? I think you need to take a good hard look in the mirror. The answer is there it is just you keep choosing to disregard it.

It is your career... your mirror...

You do. Along with the elected leadership.



Still can’t figure out why the low participation can you?

I know whay participation is low.. pilots expect others to do the work for them and they don't have the political skillset... so they create ALPA into an enemy so they can divert blame... it is called refusal to accept responsiblity....

Where did I blame the volunteers?

Sitck with me .....this is going to get good...


You sound like a lunatic at times with your misnomers and hyperbole replies towards what people write. I think half the time pilots on here just ignore your continuing fulsome writings because the summary of your messages is you have nothing actually legitimate to say.

It is still your career.... your work rules, pay, etc... you can get involved or you can leave it up to guys like me...

Failure to particapte in politics allows those to be ruled by thier inferiors....

Now, I am sure you think that I am your inferior... but why would you let me make decsions for you.. what does that say about you...



Save the woe be to me speech and continued haranguing as I commend the volunteers.

You commend the volunteers? What about the political backstabbing and backroom network...? Which of course is compromised of ..... here it comes.....wait for it...... wait.... volunteers!!

So you commend the volunteers that make the organization that you despise... without the volunteers there is no organization.. you can't have it both ways.. either you commend or condem the organzation of volunteers...

My problem of ALPA today is the structure,

Good. What are you going to do about it?

political insulation of leadership and like it or not the insulting salaries paid to the brass. However volunteers like yourself, as I said before, do more harm than good with your attitude about participation, blame and fault.

And you do more harm that good with your apathy based on misinformation. No matter what.. at the end of the day..it is your career.


Somewhere you have intentionally blurred the lines of many with their feelings today towards ALPA. You always try to turn it into a problem with the membership and attacks on volunteers within the organization.

Ahhh.. today's feelings... not like the good ol' days of ALPA...

Me thinks that people think ALPA used to be great during the golden age of this career...



I would kick you right t in the nutsack for that comment you arrogant little toad however in reality one must consider the source.

Let's stay focused on your career... your pay rates, your work rules, your 401K, your health benefits.. do you really want a jerk like me to making decisions about your life... when you come to work, how much you get paid, when you will retire....

If not... then don't be a part of the 70% that refuses to particapte in thier careers... get involved... get educated, ask questions, volunteer,


Besides, I probably wouldn’t hit anything anyway as someone obviously eviscerated it long ago and nothing is left.

Focus! Your career is at stake. You can hate me or you can fight for our profession and your career...




The problem with your argument is that participation rates haven't "dropped off the cliff," because they have always been this low. During the old days, participation rates where exactly the same. A couple of years ago ALPA did a study of participation rates by going through the old archives to see if things had changed. The results? Participation rates are the same now as they've always been in the Association. There hasn't been any drop off, pilots are just lazy and apathetic and always have been.


here is a reference... qt....how does this fit into your ideals?

From Flying the Line, Vol. 1, page 227:


Inevitably, a new generation arrived made up of pilots less steeped in the past struggles and more content about the professional status ALPA had created for them. The new generation was also increasingly indifferent to ALPA and its administration. Pioneer pilots, by and large, paid close attention to ALPA affairs, and they couldn’t understand the lackadaisical attitude of the younger pilots, partically when it came to governance at the local level. By the late 1950s, many pilots simply took for granted that somebody else would do the hard work needed to sustain ALPA. While complacent pilots golfed or pursued second careers, a minority ran ALPA’s local affairs on each airline.


Although most of these individuals were dedicated to making ALPA work, on some airlines a few pilots used ALPA as a gimmick for personal aggrandizement. The indifference of the rank and file and the poor attendance at local council meetings meant that a minority on any airline could, with proper planning, seize control and eventually dominate the master executive council (MEC) itself. The danger was that a well-organized clique could speak for an indifferent majority of pilots.

 
That voluminous reply is going to take a day to digest. Be as it may, you still keep up with the same old schtick of the real problems within ALPA. The results and current state of affairs speaks for itself.

Incidentally, is PCL_128 and you head of the ALPA mutual admiration society?
 
Don't worry flygirl, you've got Rez on the defensive back pedal, he had to use "fly the line" as his last line of defense mantra.

You go girl!
 
That voluminous reply is going to take a day to digest. Be as it may, you still keep up with the same old schtick of the real problems within ALPA. The results and current state of affairs speaks for itself.

Incidentally, is PCL_128 and you head of the ALPA mutual admiration society?

The real problems of ALPA exists... just like they do of any oganization of people: family, church, gov't, etc...

the difference is.. I am willing to work the problems and fight for positive change.. whereas you... as I gather are simply packing up your marbles and going home... pouting, chiding and breeding negativity...


Why is it I am willing to to spend time on our careers but you easily evade the effort to even discuss it... which is a strong indicator that you expect others to defend your career and when your expectations aren't met you've got the easy tactic of blame game... a classic behaviorial trait of irresponsbility...

Finally you got a a real classic SKYW responsbility dodger backing you up.... CFIT... this guy has been refusing to answer the real questions...

I'll give you the cliff notes...

Your career is your responsibility.. I am inviting you to particapte in democracy to make our profeession and your career better.. the choice is not mine, not ALPA's, rather... it is yours....


p.s. is this too long for you?
 
Last edited:
You're withholding important PAC money because you disagree with a single issue? I disagreed with the change in policy on Age-60 also, but I continued to back the PAC because I understood the importance of other battles that ALPA was fighting on Capital Hill. Pension reform, flight/duty times, the Akaka amendment, flight deck security, etc.... are all issues that ALPA is currently dealing with, not to mention the huge issue of foreign control and ownership. Open skies has the ability to completely eliminate your career, yet you'll withhold PAC money because Age-65 will simply delay your seniority advancement? What good is Age-60 if some Mexican pilot working for peanuts is flying our flying? We need to prioritize. Notice that both Occam and I disagreed with ALPA's change in policy on Age-60, but we recognized the important of the PAC on other issues. We can't give up on the PAC because of a single issue.

I'm not proud of it, but I'm not giving any money to PAC right now. I've spoken at length with our legeslative affairs guy and he's made it clear: Age 65 trumps any other political issue. It's especially strange to be a CAL pilot, where almost NONE of want to work past 60, and we've got one of our own on top vehemently pushing for an issue we don't want. I don't know what deal JP made to get in his position, but it has everything to do with pushing age change. Our guy made it pretty clear to me, JP would make any deal to get that done. I can't support that.
 
I'm not proud of it, but I'm not giving any money to PAC right now. I've spoken at length with our legeslative affairs guy and he's made it clear: Age 65 trumps any other political issue. It's especially strange to be a CAL pilot, where almost NONE of want to work past 60, and we've got one of our own on top vehemently pushing for an issue we don't want. I don't know what deal JP made to get in his position, but it has everything to do with pushing age change. Our guy made it pretty clear to me, JP would make any deal to get that done. I can't support that.

I can't really disagree that Prater is pushing the age-change agenda pretty hard. That's a fact, and it's very disappointing. However, it's only one of many issues, and it shouldn't cloud your judgment about other more important issues. Again, age change is a tiny matter compared to open skies and foreign control/ownership. And just so you know, the CAL EVP fought pretty hard for you guys on the Age-60 issue when Prater took it to the Executive Council. Your EVP is representing your interests well, even when it conflicts with Prater's wishes.
 
I'm pretty sure a lawsuit is a sufficient means to bear out some facts. We're gonna find out! This dude DOES need to cool it on here, but this is a good topic for this thread.

Does common sense require a lawsuit?

What shocking discovery is gonna change the fact that duly-elected TWA reps voted to waive their rights?

Was it Colonel Mustard in the parlor with a knife?

I suspect the "poor agrieved victims" have bupkis. If they held a smoking gun tying the vote of their reps to some sinister plot executed by Duane Woerth and a squad of his most ardent covert frogmen...they'd have used it to recruit more victims into the fold.

If I've unfairly characterized you with regard to ALPA merger policy, let me know.

I dunno. Doesn't matter. Merger Policy has evolved since 1986. It still needs work. I favor more centralized control of the process to prevent panicked reps at the local level from making quick decisions based on the stream of urine that's pouring down both pant legs.

Do you really believe this TWA lawsuit could cost too much to run to ground?

My analogy is the guy who tired to commit suicide by jumping on the subway tracks in NYC, then sued the Transit Authority when the brakeman didn't stop in time.

True dat.
 
And just so you know, the CAL EVP fought pretty hard for you guys on the Age-60 issue when Prater took it to the Executive Council. Your EVP is representing your interests well, even when it conflicts with Prater's wishes.


I appreciate the feedback, especially coming from you. It's time to review that decision for next year and I should probably stop not giving to PAC. So much of CALALPA holds the same opinion as our EVP we just can't believe our MC and JP are doing what they are doing. I believe if it fails to change this time around and we can put it on the back burner for a year or so, we'll get these guys back on track. I'll get through NOV and then review my contribution decision. Because you are right.
 
Glad to hear it.
 
Good job,PCL...and way to go Flopgut !! At least think it through before writing off the whole idea of contributing . As PCL pointed out,there are way too many things out there over the horizon to make contributing (or not:( ) a one-issue item.

:beer:


PHXFLYR:cool:









.











.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top