Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWAPA might like SWA proposal

  • Thread starter Thread starter shootr
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 92

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
If SWAPA will not allow any "harm" to come to any SWAPA pilot, why on Earth would anyone from SWAPA think that ATN ALPA would not demand the same thing for their pilots?

FACT: The ATN MEC has R-E-J-E-C-T-E-D the SWA Management SLI proposal. That means that it will not go out to the ATN pilot group for a vote, and rightly so. They won't send an unequitable and unfair proposal to our pilot group to vote on. Why would they? To waste time seeing it get voted down? Then we start over with a slightly better proposal and it too gets voted down. Where does it end?

The ATN MEC and MC will send us a proposal at some point that they feel is respectful of our pilot group if there is one to be had. If not, then we're all headed to federal arbitration where this will be settled by a neutral 3rd party. As I've stated time and time again, I have no problem with that.
 
Maybe it's just me, but when the CEO of the company that just bought you calls a meeting and subsequently makes a proposal, I would think there's more to it than just "negotiations as usual". Who knows?
 
If not, then we're all headed to federal arbitration where this will be settled by a neutral 3rd party.
Well, the friendly tone lasted about 20 hours, arbitration gets you a list, nothing more, go check it out. Good luck with that.
 
Last edited:
According to some reports, senior FO's at aai would lose close to 32 % under the latest proposal that didn't make it out for a vote....
 
Looks like Relative Seniority
From Arbitration!

Would have thought he would
Have made an acceptable
Proposal.
 
The AirTran MEC did not endorse the proposal. The Merger Committees are back at the bargaining table today.


Please clarify: They did not endorse it as in they have not acted on it yet or as in they rejected it. If they rejected it source please.


Thanks,
Ghetto
 
Last edited:
That is so laughable as to be sad that you can actually put that in print. Wake up.

It's less laughable than saying an arbitrated list would result in no
merging of the lists.

GK has told the SEC and the investment community that he is fully
merging the operations. If he lied about that material fact to investors he could end up in jail, and the lawsuits from investors could last for
years and result in the ultimate downfall of the airline. WAKE UP!
 
Please clarify: They did not endorse it as in they have not acted on it yet or as in they rejected it. If they rejected it source please.

They left Dallas and the Merger Committee went back to bargaining. There wasn't anything to reject or approve, as the MC hasn't brought them a deal. When the MC reaches a deal that they feel is acceptable, they will bring it to the MEC for them to vote on. If they approve it, then it goes out for a pilot vote. That's how it works.
 
The company wants a negotiated settlement between the pilot groups...the company usually gets what the company wants....this ain't over...

REMEMBER ITS NEGOTIATIONS
 
Looks like Relative Seniority
From Arbitration!

Would have thought he would
Have made an acceptable
Proposal.


In your mind is there any "acceptable proposal" other than relative or AAI pilots getting the top 1700 slots?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom