maxblast72
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2006
- Posts
- 931
Don't the MEC had a 98% strike vote supporting calling management's bluff. After the Merger Committee heard Gary Kelly threaten separate ops/717 fragmentation scenarios on July 14, 2011, we felt the pilots should have a say on whether they wanted to call Gary's bluff. Even your king of scope attorney could not guarantee the outcome on Aug 17, 2011 as outlined by my friend on the ATN forum several months back:Management made threats far more drastic than what Gary and crew were making here when we were in contract negotiations. Should we have caved then, too, because the "consequences...would have been catastrophic" if they hadn't been bluffing? Of course not. Leaders make judgment calls based upon experience.
"What you and Txxx have failed to mention every time you address specifically what Abrams said with regard to M/B is the second half of his statement which I will summarize: "You have a strong case in court, but it might take a long time to claim a legal victory. You might win the case but find yourself without a job. What you might actually end up with is a monetary settlement. I don't know if many of you would call that a victory." This is not word for word but I took notes that day and that is exactly the sentiment he conveyed to the entire room with a microphone in his hand. I heard every word he said and my summary is not an exaggeration or dramatized for effect."