Always deferred
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Posts
- 175
You could probably just end your statement here
Ok I'll admit.. I chuckled
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You could probably just end your statement here
USAPA? Their record speaks for itself, so NO.I would guess that in the case of SWAPA, APA, IPA, USAPA (is that a union?) you would have to be an active member of the seniority list. Therefore you could not be an officer if you were past retirement.
They should round up the guys that want to fly til 70 and euthanize them. Their home lives must be sweet. Their third wives screaming at them all day having them go pick up their dual ply adult undergarments.
Flying last week from PHX to the East coast with a US Airways jumpseater on the jump. Conversation turned to his reason for the trip to the coast. He explained to us that he was one of a group of "pro age 70 pllots" working under the radar to have the age 65 retirement age changed to 67 and then stepped to 70. He explained to me and my over 60 captain that they were attempting to keep this as clandestine as possible to keep opposition to a minimum. At this point I became irritated and asked what excuse they were using this time. He explained to us that the coming pilot shortage would be devastating to the airline industry and that in order to avoid this the retirement age would have to raised to 70 to keep all the experienced pilots in the left seat . He stated the progress was very good and that a change in the retirement age would come before the end of the year. FO at our company has a father working for the FAA and confirmed that strong consideration was indeed being given to changing the age. The gift that keeps on giving!!
So what happens in 2017? Same exact scenario. Push it up to 75? 80? How would this actually solve a shortage problem?