Despite some of our differences one thing is certain:
If we all come together on one common goal during this next round of negotiations we will win the game!
The rules have changed and the ego involved is working against you this time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Despite some of our differences one thing is certain:
If we all come together on one common goal during this next round of negotiations we will win the game!
The rules have changed and the ego involved is working against you this time.
Hansell would have us all working for less than the 98 Contract or even the POSTA adjusted for inflation.
He was brought here to break us. That is all
Hate to break this to you Lord. Look at our payscales in 2004. Adjust it for 3.5 percent inflation for 8 years.
Sick yet? We are working for LESS, than if they had done that.
This group needs educated.![]()
Very true.....and management was not already threatening pilots with further furloughs before the vote took place?
Hate to break this to you Lord. Look at our payscales in 2004. Adjust it for 3.5 percent inflation for 8 years.
Sick yet? We are working for LESS, than if they had done that.
This group needs educated.![]()
The easiest way to save is to scare the kids and reduce overhead (wages) with idle threats through concessions. Next time, look beyond the new pay scales and consider the need for both QUOTE]
Just an FYI, using the word "kids" as a reference to what sounds like the juniot pilots is very demeaning. Maybe back in the day new hires or "the junior" pilots were quite young and inexperienced, I highly doubt those that are furloughed or junior are really kids. Some are close to retirement, some are possibly former legacy guys etc... Whatever the case I'm sure most have been around the block multiple times.
Just sayin, it's common practice for the senior guys to automatically assume newhires (or 7 year junior SIC's) are new to the game... This is not one of those times..
We need to act and think like professionals, and not just in the cockpit.
You missed my point, and the ideas are not the same. In the past the largest ego in the room wanted to build a luxury brand and new he had to pay for it. He knew the pilots were the face of the company and accepted he'd have to pay for it.This has nothing to do with ego. The ideas are the same. Try to break a union with the same old same old. Strength in numbers will win every time! Hold strong.
Right on! That's the new motto.
And don't engage this Hansell guy in recurrent. Just look at the ceiling.
He's been here how long? And he only wants to talk to us now? Kinda reinforces the notion that he was only brought here to break the union and ram a POS contract through.
He's just an uglier Boisture.
You missed my point, and the ideas are not the same. In the past the largest ego in the room wanted to build a luxury brand and new he had to pay for it. He knew the pilots were the face of the company and accepted he'd have to pay for it.
The biggest ego in the room now isn't as easy to read. It was easy to see through Suckhole. He would do whatever it takes to replace the senile old SOB from Omaha. It's anybody's guess with The Caddy. Does he want to build a legacy / reputation within BH, or would he go back to lawyering? If he closes the doors on NJA over a labor dispute, I would think his goose would be cooked within BH and the business world as management. He would look like a rock star to the labor attorney world however.
Do you think if this country was invaded, the democrats and republicans would split, or join forces and obliterate the invaders?
Are you serious? No, they wouldn't come together. We are being invaded! 13 million illegals have crossed the border. Paramilitary groups have crossed and are operating inside our border. Our government is arming them and suing those here trying to stop the invasion. The Democrats have pulled up the skirt and said "have at it boys!" They've declared amnesty to illegals while ignoring the legislative branch of our government.
Article I Section 8 of our Constitution says congress has the power to repel invasions. Yet they haven't done a damn thing. They want to tell you what kind of light bulb you can have. They want to control your health care. They want to regulate the amount of Coca-Cola you can have. They want to worry about all of this BS that they aren't empowered to worry about and punt on what they're actually supposed to be doing.
Our forefathers would have started shooting a long time ago. It's time to get every single one of these worthless idiots out of there and its time to do it now. The changes necessary are going to hurt. But they're a whole lot better than the alternative.
Are you serious? No, they wouldn't come together. We are being invaded! 13 million illegals have crossed the border. Paramilitary groups have crossed and are operating inside our border. Our government is arming them and suing those here trying to stop the invasion. The Democrats have pulled up the skirt and said "have at it boys!" They've declared amnesty to illegals while ignoring the legislative branch of our government.
Article I Section 8 of our Constitution says congress has the power to repel invasions. Yet they haven't done a damn thing. They want to tell you what kind of light bulb you can have. They want to control your health care. They want to regulate the amount of Coca-Cola you can have. They want to worry about all of this BS that they aren't empowered to worry about and punt on what they're actually supposed to be doing.
Our forefathers would have started shooting a long time ago. It's time to get every single one of these worthless idiots out of there and its time to do it now. The changes necessary are going to hurt. But they're a whole lot better than the alternative.
Tinfoil hat?
But no, I think the party of 'no' should run with that message. The swing voters will eat it up!
OK, Downwind, I'll tell you one thing that's 100% wrong in your rant: "They want to regulate the amount of Coca-Cola you can have." Congress has not told you or anyone else how much soda you can have. A very misguided New York City mayor and city council is trying to do this, but last time I checked they don't control Congress. So what you said is absolutely false.
As for "they want to tell you what kind of light bulb you can have," this bill was passed in 2007 with support from both parties (House 264-163, Senate 65-27), as well as industry, and was signed into law by President Bush. So it's blatantly false to project it as a Democrat plot to take control of you and the rest of America. Anyways, there's nothing stopping you from going out and buying enough incandescent bulbs to last you your entire lifetime.
Meanwhile, the "Fast and Furious" operation was started under the Bush Administration. Yes, there were epic blunders under both the Bush and Obama Administration over this, but it's no plot to arm your so-called "paramilitary" that wants to invade America. In any case, it's going to take much, much more than a couple hundred Mexican thugs with handguns to take over this country.
As far as illegals crossing the border, they're now crossing in record numbers–as in that I mean record lows. According to CBP, border crossings have decreased by 58 percent since 2008. Also, between 2004 and 2011, the number of border guards has doubled to almost 22,000. So Congress certainly hasn't been doing nothing about illegal border crossings. In fact, they've been doing more about it in the past few years than at any other time in U.S. history.
And let me end with the health care mandate, which was originally a Republican idea meant to enforce "individual accountability." It's also the same mandate that was passed in the Massachusetts health-care bill that was signed by then-Governor Mitt Romney, the same man who is the GOP presidential nominee that was for the individual mandate before he was against it. That's a classic definition of flip-flopper.
So much for nothing in your post being factually inaccurate...
Tinfoil? Show me one thing in my post that is factually inaccurate.
How do you starve an Obama supporter? Hide his food stamps under his work shoes.[/B][/I]