ground_fog
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2005
- Posts
- 15
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Almost. It says that 3 years after the bill signing, all part 121 pilots shall have an ATP. How that is accomplished (crewmember vs. airline responsibility) is yet to be determined.After reading the bill, am I correct that the 1500 hour requirement basically kicks in 3 years from enactment of the bill? or does it kick in immediately? From my reading, it seems to slowly phase in alot. Thanks for the clarification in advance.
What do you recommend for an alternative? Instead of these guys not taking the job as you suggest... who should?
Make better personal choices in life. If you do not think you are worth only $17k/year, then do not take a job at that rate. As I already stated, you can make more working unskilled labor jobs. If you think that it's appropriate to make $17k/year as a pilot, then do not complain about the wages. You cannot have it both ways. Do not blame somebody else that makes more after working many years in the industry for the problems with the wages and work rules in the industry if you are willing to take a job at such low wages. THE REAL PROBLEM IS THAT PEOPLE ARE LINED UP FOR THE LOW WAGE JOBS! As long as people are willing to fly jets for those wages, then the market price is set.
THE REAL PROBLEM IS THAT PEOPLE ARE LINED UP FOR THE LOW WAGE JOBS! As long as people are willing to fly jets for those wages, then the market price is set.
The real solution is to establish barriers to entry. The requirement to have an ATP for 121 ops is a nice start. Not only does it place more experienced (safer) pilots in the right seat at the regionals but it could create less supply and more demand. Basic economics suggest that wages at the regionals will rise as the demand for "qualified" pilots increases. Let's keep our fingers crossed that the Senate pushes it through.
The point was made earlier, both pilots in the Buffalo crash met ATP minimums. Also, total time and having the ATP are not good predictors of pilot proficiency. The bill is messed up.
I can say that sucks.
Include soft pay from a decent contract and all it takes is one cancellation or some delays or block or better to close that gap. And that wouldn't matter if the planes were the same size, but we're talking -900's vs 50 seaters here.
How can people flying 50 seaters expect better pay when bottom feeders are flying aircraft almost twice as big for the same pay?
I made more than that on a 50 seater at 8 years...so I can say that sucks.
I'm saying, we should all come together and work together. But, we all look for that scapegoat. We all want to be the best and point the finger at who we think is the worst. Very few had any control. Now we have all the control if we work together. We all suck, so let's all work together to change our situation. Flame away!
That would be nice, but I think in reality it won't happen. The most senior pilot groups generally actually care about their pay and QOL while the junior pilot groups only want the quick upgrade and the major job. I think we've kind of plateu'd with regional airlines size wise...nobody is going to be doubling in size anymore, and quick upgrades at bottom feeders are not going to happen for the time being.
But that won't stop the next pilot group at some crappy bottom feeder trying to jump ahead because they don't care about their pay.