Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

House Passes Airline Safety and Pilot Training Improvement Act of 2009

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
It's easy to judge this from the sideline, but comments like this are generally pointless. No offense to you, but the goal isn't a $17k/year job. If there was another way to get there, as in not the military, people would take it. Everyone would like to be a 74 Captain, but nowadays that typically means time in a seat that you don't really want. I'm referring to the $17k/year RJ fo job.

The "goal" is precisely what caused the "$17k/yr RJ job...ALPA created very high pay at the top which was subsidized by low entry pay. In hindsight, the corporate pilot pay model works better...Lower top end pay, and higher entry pay.
 
The "goal" is precisely what caused the "$17k/yr RJ job...ALPA created very high pay at the top which was subsidized by low entry pay. In hindsight, the corporate pilot pay model works better...Lower top end pay, and higher entry pay.


There's a lot of truth to this. Except the corporate pilot part.

That being said, this isn't just an ALPA deal. UAW, Teamsters, just about any member of the AFL/CIO fits the description given.
 
There's a lot of truth to this. Except the corporate pilot part.

That being said, this isn't just an ALPA deal. UAW, Teamsters, just about any member of the AFL/CIO fits the description given.

It is especially bad with ALPA/APA...Very large gap between top and bottom, although that gap has narrowed as the top has come down and the bottom has come up.

Most corporate jobs start higher than regional jobs, but don't top out as much as airline jobs...Probably a better model....
 
This bill is having trouble in the senate so far, a left and a right to the kisser. This bill is starting to wobble. I wouldn't get too happy just yet.

The only part of the bill that is having trouble in the Senate is the part allowing pilots to use some sort of approved college credit in place of flight hours. Senator Schumer is doing his best to get that part killed, but he supports the rest of the bill.
 
The only part of the bill that is having trouble in the Senate is the part allowing pilots to use some sort of approved college credit in place of flight hours. Senator Schumer is doing his best to get that part killed, but he supports the rest of the bill.


I believe a senator of Tenn, who is in big purples pocket has this bill tied up with the big purple bill saying you better layoff trying to allow easy access for big purple's drivers to unionize or he plans to vote no, killing the aviation safety bill.
 
I believe a senator of Tenn, who is in big purples pocket has this bill tied up with the big purple bill saying you better layoff trying to allow easy access for big purple's drivers to unionize or he plans to vote no, killing the aviation safety bill.

Sen. Baucus still says he's going to move the bill out of committee before the end of the year. He may end up stripping the FedEx provision out to do it, but frankly, that provision is of no importance to our profession. It's just something on the Teamsters wishlist to make it easier to organize FedEx ground workers. I'd love to see it happen, but linking it to this bill isn't necessary, and Schumer will make sure that it gets stripped out if necessary to get Baucus to move the bill to the floor.
 
Hi!

Reading some of these posts reminded me of something:
I started out as a 2LT pilot trainee, making about $15K/year. I ended as a capt making $48K. I paid for my own ATP, and could not get a job. I turned down Comair's offer of paying $14K for my own training, to start with them as an FO at $14.4/year. And then I sat in non-flying jobs for 9 years.

cliff
NBO
 
There's a lot of truth to this. Except the corporate pilot part.

That being said, this isn't just an ALPA deal. UAW, Teamsters, just about any member of the AFL/CIO fits the description given.


It goes beyond the pilot professions. Our culture of having the newbie "pay his dues" is prevelant in most professions. Only a tool would place the onus on a single organization....
 
It's easy to judge this from the sideline, but comments like this are generally pointless. No offense to you, but the goal isn't a $17k/year job. If there was another way to get there, as in not the military, people would take it. Everyone would like to be a 74 Captain, but nowadays that typically means time in a seat that you don't really want. I'm referring to the $17k/year RJ fo job.

Well, then why do you guys complain all damned day about low wages and crappy work hours? You obviously believe that you are worth every dime of the pay that you are willing to take in hopes that maybe someday you will be paid better later. You weren't even tricked into taking this job.
 
Well, then why do you guys complain all damned day about low wages and crappy work hours? You obviously believe that you are worth every dime of the pay that you are willing to take in hopes that maybe someday you will be paid better later. You weren't even tricked into taking this job.


What do you recommend for an alternative? Instead of these guys not taking the job as you suggest... who should?
 
The "goal" is precisely what caused the "$17k/yr RJ job...ALPA created very high pay at the top which was subsidized by low entry pay. In hindsight, the corporate pilot pay model works better...Lower top end pay, and higher entry pay.

What people don't realize is that making more pay in the beginning would lead to more money overall due to the magic of retirement funds. It is better to make more in the beginning, and save more over the course of your whole career.

Oh well. It will be okay since ALPA is in charge!
 
This is going to be the biggest PFT bill the airline industry has ever seen. The skies will be littered with CFI's trying to build time without actual students in the airplane. For those who can't wait six years to teach their way to an ATP, they will choose another profession. For those with money, they will buy 1,250 hours.

This means fewer regional flights and more opportunities for SWA.

I don't know what the best answer is, but both pilots on 3407 met ATP experience requirements.
 
What people don't realize is that making more pay in the beginning would lead to more money overall due to the magic of retirement funds. It is better to make more in the beginning, and save more over the course of your whole career.

Oh well. It will be okay since ALPA is in charge!



Bingo. Spot on. Reference: compound interest.


I don't really get the jab at ALPA, though. They aren't in charge of my career; I am.
 
What do you recommend for an alternative? Instead of these guys not taking the job as you suggest... who should?


Thank you, well put. Good job.


It's easy to look down upon the RJ FO as 'what's wrong' with the industry. I think it more accurate to look up at the metaphorical 74 Captain as to 'what's wrong' with the industry.
 
What part SIC privileges only do you not understand. That is NOT a type.


Actually, it is very much the same Type Rating, and appears on your certificate as such under Ratings.
Only difference is it comes with a Limitation prohibiting exercising PIC privileges. It's the same as being issued a Type Rating with an SIC Required or Circling Approach VMC ONLY limitation on it.
When you take a PIC checkride, the Limitation is then removed.

It won't get you a job with an operator that requires a type to meet INSURANCE requirements, but from strictly an FAA certification standpoint there's absolutely no difference..
 
Last edited:
After reading the bill, am I correct that the 1500 hour requirement basically kicks in 3 years from enactment of the bill? or does it kick in immediately? From my reading, it seems to slowly phase in alot. Thanks for the clarification in advance.
 
After reading the bill, am I correct that the 1500 hour requirement basically kicks in 3 years from enactment of the bill? or does it kick in immediately? From my reading, it seems to slowly phase in alot. Thanks for the clarification in advance.
Almost. It says that 3 years after the bill signing, all part 121 pilots shall have an ATP. How that is accomplished (crewmember vs. airline responsibility) is yet to be determined.
 
What do you recommend for an alternative? Instead of these guys not taking the job as you suggest... who should?

Make better personal choices in life. If you do not think you are worth only $17k/year, then do not take a job at that rate. As I already stated, you can make more working unskilled labor jobs. If you think that it's appropriate to make $17k/year as a pilot, then do not complain about the wages. You cannot have it both ways. Do not blame somebody else that makes more after working many years in the industry for the problems with the wages and work rules in the industry if you are willing to take a job at such low wages. THE REAL PROBLEM IS THAT PEOPLE ARE LINED UP FOR THE LOW WAGE JOBS! As long as people are willing to fly jets for those wages, then the market price is set.
 
Hi!

You could change careers to be a teacher.

The only jobs you will find in my state will be the lower-paying private schools, or in very small public districts WAY out in the boonies.

After your 4 year degree, and your PFT semester of Student Teaching, expect to sub (if you can) for a year or so (if you can't try and find a non-teaching job), and then get a private school, or very small public school job starting at about $18K per year. You do NOT get unemployment in the summer!

It is a LOT better than flying???

cliff
NBO
 

Latest resources

Back
Top