How do you come to that conclusion? Give me the statistics in incidents per 1000s of departures that support your conclusions. I think you are jumping on an anecdotal bandwagon. We fly jets heavy, we fly them safely, and we have a crapload of flights everyday into some of the busiest and loneliest places on earth.
Umm......O.K. It will take me a week or two to mine the accident per departure numbers, but in the meantime, let's do a little non-scientific comparison to a similar sized operation with an identical mission into similar airports. We'll use UPS so you can't accuse me of ignoring the effect fatigue has on our subject.
During the last ten years, FedEx has had 40 accident/incidents. of those, let's ignore any without a probable cause yet assigned, which gets us down to 32. Now we remove any accidents/incidents where the probable cause was not attributed to a FedEx employee. (Plain dumb luck, such a furniture varnish causing an air return due to fumes in the cockpit. I'm actually being pretty generous in doing this, as FDX has several such occurrences, where UPS has none, leading me to wonder if FDX has an issue with the way they accept potentially dangerous good for shipment, but I digress.)
That task complete, and we find FedEx has had 16 incidents/accidents in the last decade where the probable cause of the accident was an error committed by an employee or crewmember of the company. In other words, a human factors accident.
Now let's apply the same weeding-out process at UPS. During the last decade, they have had five accidents. Removing three with no probable cause, we find the two left are both Human Factors accidents/Incidents.
16 vs. 2 or 40 vs. 6. However you want to paint it. FedEx has 336 airplanes, UPS 246.
All things being equal, Federal Express should have 27% more accidents than UPS, in fact the number is 85% more.
If you don't fly with us, and are not familiar with our operation, you have no basis for your statement about "human factors".
Sure I do. (see above) Look, I'm not some jealous applicant who didn't get hired. I think the world of the aviators at FedEx, and would put them up against anybody as far as skills go. You have, unarguably, a HF disaster on your hands. The likely issue is cultural. Not just the aviators, but the company as a whole. That's what I was trying to get across in my first post. With the disproportionately high amount of accidents/incidents that are occurring, there must be latent pathogens. In other words, unseen and unsafe conditions that have been allowed to exist and metastasize within your airline, allowing conditions that enable the final human error error that causes an accident. This is not me theorizing here. Google James Reason and do a little bit of reading. Are you saying I'm wrong and fault should be placed squarely at the feet of pilots, tug drivers and mechanics?
By the way, your disclaimer doesn't hold water with me.....It is like saying our soldiers are butchering babies in Iraq......"But I support the troops".
Don't be so unimaginative and un-educated about safety. Just because somebody points out FedEx has a problem doesn't mean they are slandering you, or that its sour grapes over some job interview.
So what so you think the problem is?
Blue Skies,
LJDRVR
imp: (recent pic.)
