~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
FANTASTIC, they are really excited about the numbers for Shanghai....how is Delta doing in the Asia market?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FANTASTIC, they are really excited about the numbers for Shanghai....how is Delta doing in the Asia market?
FANTASTIC, they are really excited about the numbers for Shanghai.
The arrogance of some of you Delta pilots is stunning! ...blah blah blah.
As for seniority integration...the only pilot group in the business that puts so much prestige on equipment flown is Delta. None of the rest of us cares what we fly...we just want the days off and the $$. Some of you bring up the DC-9's being old and so only NWA pilots should be furloughed...how is Delta doing in the Asia market? NWA does well there...stop cherrypicking arguments that suit your position.
...blah blah blah.. acouple things in the last paragraph were true...blah blah blah
Puff-
Asia MARKET numn$ts! Shanghai is ONE city that DAL only recently began service. NWA has an established hub in NRT.
An rj condesention again from a DAL guy...wow that is a shock. You merely prove my point about DAL guys putting so much into aircraft type.
Lastly, I don't fly an rj. Would you care to measure your manhood against mine using something else, or can you accept that the only thing that matters in this profession is how much they'll pay you to stay home as much as you can?
I can't wait 'til Occam's Razor comes to .....
I suspect that Occam is holding his fire until it becomes clear "what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Atlanta to be born."
Remember, I will pay for the third and fifth beers. And, I will walkaround the plane when it is between 75 and 80 degrees, as long as it is dry. Also, wearing the Delta uniform causes pilots to become chick magnets. Every young naive girl would love to "be wit" a Russian U-boat Commander. And are you sure you ONLY get goosebumps, or is that a banana in your pants? Hey, I don't go that way-----not that there is anything WRONG with that. Peace!
Bye Bye--General Lee
I suspect that Occam is holding his fire until it becomes clear "what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Atlanta to be born."
Olympus - who is that in your avatar?
Puff-
Asia MARKET numn$ts! Shanghai is ONE city that DAL only recently began service. NWA has an established hub in NRT.
An rj condesention again from a DAL guy...wow that is a shock. You merely prove my point about DAL guys putting so much into aircraft type.
Lastly, I don't fly an rj. Would you care to measure your manhood against mine using something else, or can you accept that the only thing that matters in this profession is how much they'll pay you to stay home as much as you can?
Drunk:Puff-
No, you didn't get over it in high school because you still make insecure insults about rj's like most DAL pilots I've known. But let's get back on the real issue...
BFD!DAL is nothing in the Asia Pacific market and NWA is strong (relative to DAL).
OK, I tell you what.....Lets try the comparison from where you work. I don't know, but lets say you're flying from a mostly 70 seater operation, and merging with a 50 seat operation. After the 2 co's are done merging most of the 50 seaters will be parked and most of the furloughes will come from your airlines part of the seniority list. I mean after all they're bringining the 50 seaters with the better route structure so, its fair, right?For every DC-9 taunt there can also be an Asia retort from a redtailer. Why do DAL pilots insist on saying only NWA pilots should get furloughed because of the DC-9 when NWA would bring a lot of revenue that DAL pilots don't have access to?
I think if the companies are merged, then both groups should share in a furlough. No need for a windfall.
Go ALPA! *extreme sarcasm*
OK, I tell you what.....Lets try the comparison from where you work. I don't know, but lets say you're flying from a mostly 70 seater operation, and merging with a 50 seat operation. After the 2 co's are done merging most of the 50 seaters will be parked and most of the furloughes will come from your airlines part of the seniority list. I mean after all they're bringining the 50 seaters with the better route structure so, its fair, right?
737
Of course its fair in your eyes, you're part of that bozo group that tried to sue for $100,000,000.Using your example....yes it is fair.
There is some value we would be getting from the 50 seat operator which would make us a stronger carrier. In addition, they are fellow ALPA members and the shoe could have been on the other foot. This is the problem with ALPA and you legacy guys.....You worry too much about the size of aircraft.....Longevity should be more important than aircraft size......
Puff-
No, you didn't get over it in high school because you still make insecure insults about rj's like most DAL pilots I've known. But let's get back on the real issue...
DAL is nothing in the Asia Pacific market and NWA is strong (relative to DAL). For every DC-9 taunt there can also be an Asia retort from a redtailer. Why do DAL pilots insist on saying only NWA pilots should get furloughed because of the DC-9 when NWA would bring a lot of revenue that DAL pilots don't have access to? I think if the companies are merged, then both groups should share in a furlough. No need for a windfall.
Go ALPA! *extreme sarcasm*
Let's examine this statement. The reason NWA would expect the DAL side to at least share in furloughs is that it is the DALPA contract that allows the parking of the -9's that would cause the furloughs. Now the second part, DAL sharing in the attrition: What part of the NWAALPA contract justifies DAL pilots sharing in NWA attrition? Lack of DAL retirements is due to retirement provisions(lump sum) in the DALPA contract right?NWA was not comfortable with that approach for the reason that they are not allowed to capture "their" retirements. In other words, it basically boils down to the fact that they want US to share in their "furlough" metal, but they do not want us to share their attrition with regard to a seniority list.
Actually that is a hole in the NWA scope, from several angles. The oblique angle has to do with your own outsourcing provisions and the more direct angle has to do with your contract's inability to bind a third party successor. Regardless, if your airplanes are being outsourced it IS your problem. As for how effective your scope is, I refer you to your own CEO's most recent two quarterly conference calls - which I have posted previously.Let's examine this statement. The reason NWA would expect the DAL side to at least share in furloughs is that it is the DALPA contract that allows the parking of the -9's that would cause the furloughs.
Puffdriver is right.Now they are going to get the traditional approach that they wanted, albeit with some twists. Their "representatives" on this board seem very sure of their position in an arbitration what with their favorable cash position, paid for -9s, and rock solid scope clause. Now, their "real" representatives are posturing with threats of scorched earth if they don't get their way.
I will accept it either way and move on. Sounds as if NWA will only accept their way, or the highway--from their MEC rag anyway.
Let's examine this statement. The reason NWA would expect the DAL side to at least share in furloughs is that it is the DALPA contract that allows the parking of the -9's that would cause the furloughs. Now the second part, DAL sharing in the attrition: What part of the NWAALPA contract justifies DAL pilots sharing in NWA attrition? Lack of DAL retirements is due to retirement provisions(lump sum) in the DALPA contract right?
Seems like a double standard. DAL scope allows all the -9's to be parked with zero penalty vs. NWA scope. NWA demographics create the future attrition. Yet you say that NWA -9 pilots should be furloughed while DAL pilots take the attrition?
Puffdriver is right.