Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Having instructed at FSI in 1991-'92, I second Russian 100%. While I thought the place could have provided more in-depth ground school, the ground school was adequate and the flight training was second to none. FSI has been doing it for years. The place is organized, the equipment is first-rate, and the facilities are excellent. It really is organized something like a college campus, with the flight line at one end and the dorms and school buildings a walk across a field.Originally posted by The_Russian
What do you have to compare DCA to? Have you been to FSI or Pan Am, etc? Two out of few of the schools that I went to was DCA and FSI. FSI was a college of aviation. DCA (then Comair actually) was a joke.
Russian is absolutely correct. FSI's checklists were very much airline-oriented. So were its flight profiles. I instructed in the Alitalia program, and the Chief Instructor was so impressed with how Alitalia taught precision even in non-precision approach procedures that he adopted them school-wide.The aircraft at FSI were maintained properly with a progressive mx program. DCA leases a bunch of planes with horrible equipment and does the minimum FAA mx required. DCA's proceedures are "kick the tires, light the fires" compared to FSI's flight ops. Just read the briefing page on FSI's checklist.
Xak said:BUMP!
Does anyone else have anything to say regaurding the specific topic???
I'd like to hear peoples opinions who've actually attended DCA; not people who know people who've attended, or people who've heard things about it, or people who want to compare academies to FBO's or whatever, but from students who've graduated or are currently enrolled in the prgm...
Thanks.
-Xak