Sounds like a step in the right direction. Like all things political, it's a compromise and likely there will be more compromise when this provision has to be brought into harmony with the House.
Yip, your example may be valid where this legislation will not serve everyone 100% of the time, but two points. One, I'd rather have a 800 hour minimum (or something higher than comm. pilot mins) and have a few people like your C130 friend fall through the cracks instead of what we have now. Two, your friend chose to be a military pilot and jumped through a bunch of hoops to be there and that's great. If she wants to be an airline pilot, then she can fly for LESS THAN another year to get her 800 hours or get a job on the side and fly. If she wanted to be an airline pilot in the first place, she could have skipped the military route, flight instructed for a year or so, and then applied for a job at your airline.
Yip, your example may be valid where this legislation will not serve everyone 100% of the time, but two points. One, I'd rather have a 800 hour minimum (or something higher than comm. pilot mins) and have a few people like your C130 friend fall through the cracks instead of what we have now. Two, your friend chose to be a military pilot and jumped through a bunch of hoops to be there and that's great. If she wants to be an airline pilot, then she can fly for LESS THAN another year to get her 800 hours or get a job on the side and fly. If she wanted to be an airline pilot in the first place, she could have skipped the military route, flight instructed for a year or so, and then applied for a job at your airline.