G100driver said:
What exactly did the auto unions do there industry? Make crappy, ugly cars ... nope they just produced what management told them to. Not think about fuel effency ... nope management again. Build bohemeth cars (which by the way made lots of money for everyone back in the day) ... nope, management again..
Since you asked... I grew up in a UAW family. You couldn't grow up in
Michigan without knowing half the state worked for the auto companies.
I saw workers drinking before their 2nd shift, workers getting high before
their 3rd shift, workers drinking and smoking dope at their lunch hours.
How did they get away with such things? Easy, don't do it on company
property and there wasn't a single thing the company could do.
No doubt management designed junk which got poor mileage, rattled after
you left the dealer's lot, needed excessive maintenance, performed like
a tractor and handled like one too. But that had nothing to do with unions
demanding more and more and more... until the overhead associated
with producing a car drove the costs out of sight. All this in the name
of COLAs when in reality they were already paying
unskilled labor (as
defined by the unions!) 3X normal wages. I have a brother-in-law who
just retired. His pay as an
unskilled laborer was just shy of $70K per
year. Multiply that by a couple of hundred thousand.
We can all see what the domestic companies are going through today.
Hundreds of thousands have lost their jobs since the 80s with tens
of thousands more imminent. All due to high overhead. Read
Iococca
(dated but relevant) to get a glimpse of the CEOs daily worries.
I think if you read my post correctly you'd find I'm behind the union effort
all the way. Not that it matters as I'm no longer in the industry. But
that aside, I have always felt unions as a necessary evil. But ONLY AS
LONG AS THEY REMEMBER WHO THEY WORK FOR! The minute they're
making demands on the company which threaten long-term viability...
they've become the UAW in drag.
I am also keenly aware your industry does not fit into the
unskilled labor
market. To the contrary, your industry requires highly skilled persons
of high character. My point was unions started out protecting the
workers, all workers, but got off track somewhere making unrealistic
long-term demands which no longer fit into the "protecting the worker"
mantra. They started demanding for the sake of demanding. Ford
made a billion dollars profit one year some time back. Ford became the
next strike target. Did the billion dollars materialize the next year? No,
but that didn't stop the union from making demands based on that one
single year's profit. In fact, a
strike target was picked every year.
Why? I'm not sure as compensation was very good already. If the
contract was written good enough to guarantee compensation increases
then why strike? Oh, forgot... to demand more.
I'm ranting, getting back to the pilots union...
High skills = high wages. It would be my hope that every pilot make
$100K starting wage. Why? Because anybody can land a plane in
perfect weather and all systems functional. It takes skill and knowledge
of flight when when the weather changes and the plane decides the
MEL is only created for human consumption.
