www.
SoCo Guy
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2006
- Posts
- 821
I do believe that they have defended my CURRENT quality of life with the exception of the CDO grievance.
I'm going to dive in on this. Do you know the "whole story" to this case? Let me know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do believe that they have defended my CURRENT quality of life with the exception of the CDO grievance.
1. I don't really know any of the Fab 4 candidates. So maybe some fresh meat would be a good thing for negotiations.
2. If they can come up with a TA in three months at least it will be some progress. If it sucks the pilot group can vote it down.
3. My point is, we need some forward progress, good or bad.
Of the 4 voting members of the MEC, 1 is now the MEC Chairman, 2 are running again, and the fouth is going to LAX so won't be a member of Council 112.
And most of what Lynn has "promised" has already been TA'd.
Hoser
I'm going to dive in on this. Do you know the "whole story" to this case? Let me know.
A contract could have been signed months or even years ago. It would include pay cuts, per diem decreases, scheduling and other QOL issues left behinds. No rigs, no 401k, increases in health insurance premiums, no DH, or CNX pay.
How does that sound?
So tell us, which chief pilot are you?
1. If you don't know someone or their work, or lack of, why would you vote for them. Just because their a good guy to hang out with.
Yes I think I know the "whole story" and it makes me sick. Sick that Nelson testified against the pilot group, sick that we did not provide a rebuttal witness and lastly sick that the case was ruled against ALPA. This issue changed my view of the grievance process and its ability to provide fair and equitable solutions. I once again realized that everything between ALPA and management is political. Concern over me the individual is secondary.