ASADriver
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2004
- Posts
- 706
Just because we're not meeting doesn't mean nothing's happening. Gotta love the Generation X mantra of Instant Gratification!
You sure have an interesting definition of "instant".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just because we're not meeting doesn't mean nothing's happening. Gotta love the Generation X mantra of Instant Gratification!
Have you seen this mandate? I haven't and neither has any other member of the rank and file. I wonder why?
Have you seen this mandate? I haven't and neither has any other member of the rank and file. I wonder why?
LJ was instrumental in working on our current contract. This contract was, according to many of those here at the DOS, industry leading at that tx. If the only reason you have for not voting for LJ is b/c of what SH may or may not have said in a R/T class then you need to start thinking for yourself.
Good point. We are told that these things are what the majority wants, but we aren't shown the actual polling to back up those statements. How do we know that this is what the majority wants. I guess this election will determine if this is really what the majority wants.
She better be ready for the truth to come out about her ALPA experience, because I heard that some of the members of that MEC and the ASA negotiator that she sent out of the room to pull her tricks, are going to hold her accountable, should she get the nomination!
Good, I am all for accountability for elected officers both present and future. By the way have you seen the polling data that the MEC is vigorously fighting for? What are they doing to get this done? They say no more negotiating w/o the mediator present. The mediator has stated no more dates until the two sides comes closer together on the proposals. Correct me if I am wrong but how are the two sides suppose to get the gap reduced w/o talking with each other?
Sorry, DN says a Proffer of Arbitration from the NMB is on the way...
Good luck Dave
I'm sure that statement gave the room a good warm and fuzzy to know that our trusted leader has no plan B. They had to know that this move was a hail mary when they made the request.
Well, it seems we've found three very vocal opponents of this MEC. If what they're saying is true that the majority is against the MEC, you'd think there would be HUNDREDS on here criticizing! But there are not... just the usual handful of malcontents.
Preach on guys. I'm sure you represent the other 1697 or so. Really. I'm sure you'll sway the vote by shouting from your soapbox here. But time is running out. Better turn up the anti-alpa rhetoric quick.
Things that make you go Hmmmmmm.
I'm betting nobody but our Golden Domed friend even zeroed in on that remark (if it was even made, which I doubt). But I'm sure he'll respond that EVERYONE IN THE CLASS was aghast! See, the truth is whatever you believe it is, and when you hate your leaders that much, it poisons your mind to objectivity.
We aren't anti-alpa. We want ALPA to do things differently and we want ALPA to stop the transfer of aircraft. Just because you criticize the way some things are done in ALPA, doesn't mean you are anti-alpa.
The current MEC is stepping out. Only Faruzzi is running again, and many don't want him to continue. If the MEC is going to be replaced, many of us are ready for a different approach to these negotiations.
Johnny, it's all about accountability of which the present MEC has very little. I am not anti-ALPA/union yet I do have serious doubts about our present local leadership and the "Stay the Course" mentality. Say what you want about LJ and the coalition but it is tx for change within the local 112. When SKW Inc bought ASA they never changed tactics to adabt to our new negotiating environment which was a serious mistake. To this date they have still refused have refused to make any changes. This will drag on for another 4 years w/o change.
JP, do you believe that the NMB will hand down a proffer of arbitration? Do you have confidence in the this "Stay the Course" mentality that our present MEC has put in place? Do you believe that we can get the gap between proposals closer together if we don't actually sit at the table and communicate? If you answered no to any of these questions then, no matter how great DN and the MEC are as people, it may be tx for a change.
Actually at a recent recurrent class, Dave admitted that the NMB will probably turn down ALPA's request for a profer. When asked what ALPA's next step will be if the NMB turns down the request, he answered "we don't know". Instills confidence doesn't it.
BINGO! The gap is too far and the NMB isn't going to give us a release or even bring us back together until the gap is closed. Digging in our heels now will simply result in us remaining parked while our airplanes are sent to Skywest. Time for a change.
Good point. We are told that these things are what the majority wants, but we aren't shown the actual polling to back up those statements. How do we know that this is what the majority wants. I guess this election will determine if this is really what the majority wants.
Actually at a recent recurrent class, Dave admitted that the NMB will probably turn down ALPA's request for a profer. When asked what ALPA's next step will be if the NMB turns down the request, he answered "we don't know". Instills confidence doesn't it.