relief tube
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2003
- Posts
- 999
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FlyHIToo said:Because of the NMB ruling in Dec, even if ALPA is voted in at GJ there would still be two pilot groups and CBAs. ALPA national told the TSA pilots this in a letter just prior to voting down the LOA back in Spet. I can get you a copy of this letter if you do not believe me.
So the only way that the two groups could merge at this point is if both sides and the company agreed to it.
These are just the facts. It is not as easy as you make it sound.
relief tube said:how bad is it when a management group that is second only to Mesa's JO in terms of being reviled, has to give a hojets scab pilot group a get-a-jumpseat free card.
sad we live in a world where an alter ego can staff a willing pilot group.
Thebadcat1313 said:I think you're giving TSA management a lot of credit here. They are way worse scum than JO (not defending JO, mind you). The Mesa folks I meet seem generally quite a bit happier than those at TSA. TSA is the most micro-managed regional out there. I don't think there is any other management that despises their employees (especially pilots) as much as they do. The stories of the abuse even in the pre-union days are horrendous.
Thebadcat1313 said:I don't think there is any other management that despises their employees (especially pilots) as much as they do. The stories of the abuse even in the pre-union days are horrendous. We all need to support the TSA pilots.
panamclipper said:Well - What do you expect when u aggravate the VP of OPS (MW) by calling the FAA instead of handling it in-house.
What a naive statement, you must be management. Let's all remember in the future not to involve the FAA when we think there is a problem, management is there for us and we should just handle it "in-house".
I also agree this thread should not be stickied, but it's obvious someone at flighitnfo has some connection with G0JETS, hence the censoring. I think this thread was stickied to bring attention to the TSA pilot for supposedly "screwing it up" for everyone else. However, I am now glad it's stickied because I believe more people are starting to realize what the TSA pilots are really up against. Stay strong TSA brothers.
QUAG said:What a naive statement, you must be management.
1) Not a naive statement and I am not management-not even close. Don't even work for them. Just happened to work for (MW) 8 years ago and know how he operates. I like they way when someone says something opposite, or different, or questioning the motives; they get accused of being management.
Let's all remember in the future not to involve the FAA when we think there is a problem, management is there for us and we should just handle it "in-house".
2) Seemed like a really dumb idea to me to call the FAA in regards to a political/company/internal strife issue. Once they get involved who knows what can happen. Never said management was "there" for any pilot, just thought it couldn't come to any meaningful end by bringing the government into the issue.
I also agree this thread should not be stickied, but it's obvious someone at flighitnfo has some connection with G0JETS, hence the censoring. I think this thread was stickied to bring attention to the TSA pilot for supposedly "screwing it up" for everyone else. However, I am now glad it's stickied because I believe more people are starting to realize what the TSA pilots are really up against. Stay strong TSA brothers.
3) Don't see how Flightinfo has some connection with GJTS when they let this thread be stickied, so it eternally can be seen as the #1 issue at the the top of the thread lists. From the looks of it they have a connection with TSA. Anybody can write anything they want about the issue even if they know nothing about it. They don't stop that. As far as censoring it is probably because someone is breaking the message board rules. You can email the moderators and ask them.
4) As far as what the TSA pilots are up against - I am not even going to answer because I don't know the details and I won't speculate. Just thought it was dumb to get the FAA involved that is all.
QUAG said:4) As far as what the TSA pilots are up against - I am not even going to answer because I don't know the details and I won't speculate. Just thought it was dumb to get the FAA involved that is all.
QUAG said:ooopps!! double post, damn I need to take this drinking thing easy
QUAG said:I also agree this thread should not be stickied, but it's obvious someone at flighitnfo has some connection with G0JETS, hence the censoring. I think this thread was stickied to bring attention to the TSA pilot for supposedly "screwing it up" for everyone else. However, I am now glad it's stickied because I believe more people are starting to realize what the TSA pilots are really up against. Stay strong TSA brothers.
I couldn't agree with you more.
PCL_128 said:And HoJets scum, just to be clear, you aren't welcome on my airplane either. Go take a hike.
kjokmo said:Why do pilots always think its their airplane?
FlyHIToo said:1st off...TSA PILOTS and "Blackbox" are the only people that seem to care about this....Most all the posts here are by TSA Pilots
So you are saying that reguardless of the facts .... My opinion is the only right opinion?
GJ, TSA and TSA Holdings are no different that AE, AA and AMR, or DAL, ComAIR and DAL Holdings.
AE has put AA pilots on the street. ComAir grew at the expense of the DAL Pilots. With our logic no AA or DAL pilot should let a regional pilot in their jumpseat. Professionalism is the difference here.