Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Are Low time new hires at regionals safe?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Trust me, you mastered nothing at 100-120 hours.

I agree most people with that "overwhelming" :erm: amount of time only know enough to be dangerous.
 
At the small freight company I fly for I've noticed that the low time FOs (250-350 hrs) did better than the other guys. 1000 hours of part 91 piston time isn't that much better than 350 hours. Who cares about the flight time. The problem I've noticed is that underperforming pilots aren't washed out of ground school because they are needed on the line.
 
OMG it was a ********************ing joke lol.
 
At the small freight company I fly for I've noticed that the low time FOs (250-350 hrs) did better than the other guys. 1000 hours of part 91 piston time isn't that much better than 350 hours. Who cares about the flight time. The problem I've noticed is that underperforming pilots aren't washed out of ground school because they are needed on the line.
At 250-350 hours a Shorts is an opportunity. With over 1000 hours, if you're still looking at a Shorts FO job, something must be wrong. Sorry to be blunt, just a reality check. I really don't think your 1000 hour FO's are representative of the industry.
 
I've flown with many marginal FO's who are by miracle in the left seat now. Couple them with the FO's we hire now and there's your proof. Every day the regionals such as mine are losing their best pilots.

So you're basing your view that a majority of regional captains suck (and that people should wait for a mainline flight) on having flown with a bunch of crappy FOs who now SUCCESSFULLY passed [insert airline here]'s FAA supervised upgrade program, and are now captains? Once sucked, always sucked, huh? Guess you never improved as a pilot? I know I was a sucky FO... I just didn't care back then.

Think maybe you're making a blanket generalization? Your credibility is lacking here. You have only proved that you have a strong OPINION. And a propensity to post flamebait.
 
My biggest concern is not time in the cockpit, but time in life. At 24, Your still 24. No training, no type rating, no special wavier can make you wiser. Nothing against 24 year olds. I was 24 once. My Dad use to tell me " Son, their are two things that will give you maturity in life. Time and pain. Physical and mental pain."
He was so right.
 
I know many outstanding career regional pilots that are happy where they are at for several reasons, seniority, pay, schedules or the fact that they have military retirement cash coming in additionally to enhance there pay. You must have seen a whole lot of crap at Mesa huh? Maybe you should have picked a better regional to fly for because your comments are slightly ignorant at best...............
:bomb:
Actually, he's here at ASA. Not sure if thats good or bad luck for us.
 
My biggest concern is not time in the cockpit, but time in life. At 24, Your still 24. No training, no type rating, no special wavier can make you wiser. Nothing against 24 year olds. I was 24 once. My Dad use to tell me " Son, their are two things that will give you maturity in life. Time and pain. Physical and mental pain."
He was so right.

What a great point.
 
My overall experience with our newhire FO's has been good. Most of thm seem to be pretty "with it" . I attribute MUCH of this to the great training dept. we have. The best in the regionals without doubt. Better than or atleast equal to the majors.

As long as things go according to plan, the low timers seem to do pretty well. I worry about those few times when ********************HitsTheFan and we have to start getting outside "the box" and do some of that "pilot"********************".
 
My biggest concern is not time in the cockpit, but time in life. At 24, Your still 24. No training, no type rating, no special wavier can make you wiser. Nothing against 24 year olds. I was 24 once. My Dad use to tell me " Son, their are two things that will give you maturity in life. Time and pain. Physical and mental pain."
He was so right.
My dad's was a little different:
"if you're gonna be dumb, you've gotta be tough".....and I'm one He!! of a tough SOB.:)
 
My biggest concern is not time in the cockpit, but time in life. At 24, Your still 24. No training, no type rating, no special wavier can make you wiser. Nothing against 24 year olds. I was 24 once. My Dad use to tell me " Son, their are two things that will give you maturity in life. Time and pain. Physical and mental pain."
He was so right.

what a load of bull!
 
Wasn't there a time back pre 2001 when 300 - 500 hours was the norm? I hear alot of Captains complaining about low mins when a lot of them where hired 9 or 10 years ago with the same time. I can honestly say that I've flown with low time FO's and they do a great job. I think in comes down to training.

NOT flying an RJ, there weren't too many around before 2001 anyway. In the late 90's after most regionals did away with the pay for training programs, you could get on with the lower tier turboprop 19 seat airlines with low time, IF you knew people and had a BS degree from the right university. Back then, if you wanted to get with Comair, SKW, or Am Eagle, you needed good cargo or commuter T-prop time, or jet time. Now, you need a pulse and a 500 TT.

What concerns me with the low timers I see having trouble the most are deficiencies in landing a swept wing no-slat jet. They aren't used to the speed regime (which a turboprop would assist in teaching greatly) and will float, balloon, drift, land with too much sideload, too much vertical rate, too slow, you name it. They don't have the experience, ability, and confidence to quickly see and fix problems that can arise in the seconds from thrust reduction to touchdown. The CA ends up actually giving flight instruction to save the landing, it's either that, a balked landing, 'my aircraft'.

My fear is this will happen: a weak CA permits a new FO to flare and float an RJ too high (hung up at 50') with too much of a thrust reduction (flight idle), and the A/C crashes in a high sink rate/low energy state (stalling) because no one called for or performed a balked landing. IMO it's just a matter of time. I've seen this happen a few times at night, the last time I told my FO to lower the nose twice, I'm sure we would've impacted hard otherwise (rather than very slightly firm).

Anyway, be careful guys, and listen to those Radio Altimeter calls.
 
"My fear is this will happen: a weak CA permits a new FO to flare and float an RJ too high (hung up at 50') with too much of a thrust reduction (flight idle), and the A/C crashes in a high sink rate/low energy state (stalling) because no one called for or performed a balked landing. IMO it's just a matter of time. I've seen this happen a few times at night, the last time I told my FO to lower the nose twice, I'm sure we would've impacted hard otherwise (rather than very slightly firm"

Already happened. Jazz did it and drove both main gears through the wings. I don't know what kind of time the Captain had, but it really doesn't matter. A landing can get nasty in a CRJ in the last 50' and no matter what kind of experiance you have, you might not be able to save it.
The Jazz pictures are on the internet, I just don't have the link.
 
Last edited:
Young pilots, of what I've are very impressive. The knowledge they pick-up is great. I do agree its a credit to training departments and other pilots shearing knowledge that helps. Young people are smarter then my generation was. My kids do work in school well ahead of what I was doing at their age. I met a young man one day at our training center. He looked like he was in his early 20's. There was a new hire class going and I asked him if he was in the class. He said no, he was there for up-grade. He told me he as 24 just got married, has a baby due in a couple of months, and is closing on a house in a few days. I thought, wow! at 24. 24 for me was a blur. liven life large in the military no real responsibility. just learning the ropes of life. My old advice I gave him was "Right a round 30-35. You are going to get this over-whelming feeling that you missed out of something. Don't do anything rash. Hopefully it will go away.........
 
My old advice I gave him was "Right a round 30-35. You are going to get this over-whelming feeling that you missed out of something. Don't do anything rash. Hopefully it will go away.........

I decided to become a pilot.......... good advice.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top