My guess is that USAPA will announce a membership vote on a one-time-only suspending the DOH provision for this SLI and hope that it fails so that they can be vindicated. If it doesn't they will cloak their DOH list in another name and fein an attempt at "reasonableness" and provide cover for their inevitable lawsuit from AOL when west pilots are stapled below 3rd listers.
It makes up a little for how bad this job sucks compared to the one we left when we started military leave.
Really, that's all? How about the fact that you handed these goons the Section 19 keys to ruin folks careers if they don't submit to extortion and then fail to represent them.
Do you understand what is meant by "3-way"? It means the West pilots would have our own representation before the arbitration panel. If that happens we'll hand over the Nicolau List and start from there. The more important thing you'd have to decide is whether three arbitrators who've worked alongside and indeed been mentored by George Nicolau will choose to ignore his work. Do you feel lucky?
We don't need to.
Might wanna re-read that transcript. Scratch that, just believe what ever the USAPA update tells you.
Explain how USAPA gets around the threat of the east pilots petitioning for an injunction if DOH is not used. Any compromise has to begin with DOH being struck from the USAPA constitution (probably easier than it sounds). That takes the first bullet out of the chamber.
Sorry this is news to you but a little research can save you more embarrassment. Please visit http://www.cactuspilot.com/ to see who AOL is. I'll even be especially helpful and tip you off to the tab on the left which reads "About Us".
This was a hearing, not a trial. The only order issued was to submit more briefs. The content of those briefs won't be a surprise to anybody.
Yes, but it won't be luck. It's what's right.
If you like you can research how often an RLA arbitrator redoes another arbitrator's work. Surely you wouldn't presume it happens all the time? In any case, as stated before, you'd be better off WITH the Nic in a three way. My guess if the arbitration panel tossed the Nic it would be for something less onerous to the West.
Don't worry, USAPA the spin machine will air their victory update soon enough.
One may always file to be excluded from a class. In fact, the class is required to inform you of that option. To my knowledge zero have opted out.
See you in court.
She said the 9th is always right (I wonder what the Supreme Court would think of that) and that is precisely what the 9th said. They clearly delineated the freedom to negotiate from the responsibility of the result to not disadvantage the west.
Once again, you're not understanding the proceedings. Tuesday was only a hearing and the only order was for more briefs. She has not ordered us to negotiate and if she does the result will be nil. We already negotiated once before and the Nic was the result. The likely outcomes are either granting an injunction or dismissing the case. If it's the latter the struggle against your malevolence is far from over.
