Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
*whew!* Good... you scared me there for a second.Lear.. I haven't said I'm voting for anything... But, isn't the scope for 88 seats or less? I havent even got a chance to look at the entire thing, but trust me, I will, and Im thinking a "no" vote is in order... My point was simply, that it looks to be better than what the rumors were saying.. Simple as that.. There is a tone of chitty things, but I don't think anyone was expecting 180+ hr, even though it happens at year 15.. Year 12 would put the company in the ball park..
I think you're right, $180/hr at Year 12 would be in the ballpark, with no 15-year pay scale in either seat.
I haven't seen the Scope section in its entirety, only a confirmation that the language doesn't protect against 90- or 100- seat jets reconfigured for business class service which is an immediate NO vote for me. Like I've said before, that could scope a large portion of us right out of a job or at least into stagnation of growth for several years when they decide to replace the 717 fleet with Embraers.
The addition of new planes doesn't really help either with the replacement of MEH aircraft. That carrot is way too little to make any real difference.
The flight attendants are going to absolutely LOVE us if we sign for aircraft movement to door-open... The summer of love is here,,,