Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta Pilots Association - DPA

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Count this 12 yr+ pilot as having scope #1 priority.
That being said, I think that the latest uproar is blown out of proportion. I certainly do not like it either, but feel that the fownside of a loss in arbitration was unacceptable as a risk.

Count me also in as one who does not want to bring Compass, Comair, Mesaba on the list. My hugely scientific poll, meaning asking my f/os from these places, indicates that there is still a large gap in wage, quality of life, and retirement that needs to be closed prior to hauling everyone on board and then closing the gap with my negotiating captial.

Thatbeing said, I am all in favor of bringing in 70 seat scope in C12K and striking over it.

Thoughts from a middle guy.

Which way do the contracts need go. Mainlines have been getting worse and the regional's better. Their contracts have gotten a lot better as of late.

I also agree that many have over reacted this time. Our MEC better have taken note. The question that needs to be asked is why?
 
I am not sure that ALPA is the only one to share this blame.
We at DAL have always as a group voted for the contract that gave away scope. It is an issue, but we always sign on to it. Is that the message we are sending?????!
I think that we have finally in an effective way gone on record that scope is no longer a section of the contract that we sell for perceived gains.
 
The fact that DAL is now so large also give the group more total pull in the national structure.

Super, if you feel passionately about scope, maybe you need to get involved a little bit. Maybe an idea for a resolution at a council meeting?

You had formerly claimed to be a student of Occam's Razor, but this current thread doesn't sound much like that..

I am a bit confused, I have never claimed to be a student of occams :confused: I have met him once though, nice guy for sure.

With that said, I am getting involved and making my voice heard and no not just on here. Everyone should do the same.
 
Quite true, and you can get involved. Become a LEC rep and effect change. As always you can vote no even if it comes with a pay increase.
 
Very well said.

When you hear all the "reasonable'' RJ guys talk about a "solution" that works for "everyone", if not allowing bigger aircraft, it involves a compromise whereby we all "give up a little" so they can get something other than a staple.

So what did they give up? As if Capt in an RJ is the equivalent of Capt in a mainline in terms of career expectations and experience? Nor is it the equivalent of a mainline F/O - your Feeder experience IS worth something - getting you an interview and a bottom of the list number at a mainline if you are lucky. Even a staple is a windfall as many who might not have been hired otherwise now have a mainline number.

If you spent 12 yrs at a feeder it was personal *choice* or a deficiency that prevented you from being hired at a mainline - neither of which is ALPA's nor mainlines pilots job to rectify...


Heyas F4H,

I like your argument. The "reasonable" RJ guys all say the same thing "fkcu yea, we'll take a staple", because they understand that it is sure thing advancement to a better career.

It's the angry ones that are impeding the process for the silent majority. These are the guys you mention in your message, the same one's who want something for nothing because they were too lazy or stupid to get off their a$$ and get their career going.

I'm done catering to these guys. If the opportunity comes to reclaim the 70 seat flying, I'll be happy to do it, with no quarter given. If that means putting one or more DCI carriers plain out of business, then so be it.

Nu
 
Count this 12 yr+ pilot as having scope #1 priority.
That being said, I think that the latest uproar is blown out of proportion. I certainly do not like it either, but feel that the fownside of a loss in arbitration was unacceptable as a risk.

Count me also in as one who does not want to bring Compass, Comair, Mesaba on the list. My hugely scientific poll, meaning asking my f/os from these places, indicates that there is still a large gap in wage, quality of life, and retirement that needs to be closed prior to hauling everyone on board and then closing the gap with my negotiating captial.

Thatbeing said, I am all in favor of bringing in 70 seat scope in C12K and striking over it.

Thoughts from a middle guy.
Puff Driver:

Let me ask your response to this concept:

As we outsource flying our bargaining strength is decreased resulting in a long term negative trend of lower highs and lower lows.

I'm all for "taking it back" but we probably will have to do that through mergers. In the alternative we would have to exit ALPA (due to the legal conflict of interest) wait for a Section 6 opportunity and fight tooth and nail for scope. I support either option, but I doubt we would decertify and doubt we'd fight as hard as we would need to to take it back - after all 12 billion dollars worth of airplanes is HUGE bargaining capital for management. Merging Compass, then Mesaba, then Comair are a whole lot more realistic way to bring Delta flying back to the Delta pilots. These mergers could be done under current contracts without full blown section 6 negotiations.

What else is a realistic way to reach our common goals?

The Delta new hires that would flow to the top of the Compass list would make the same, if not slightly better, earnings. Most regionals now have trip / duty rigs, 401K matching, performance incentives and profit sharing .... our insurance was worlds better. To sum up, a DAL pilot could bid the left seat of Compass to make more money under current contracts without costing you any of your bargaining capital.

If we plotted outsourcing and your pay, with other airlines that do not outsource, you might be surprised to find that your bargaining power is increased as Delta pilots control more flying.

The reason why the 76 seat scope settlement is such a big deal is because it again indicates that our union sees scope violations as something to be bargained. Our Company orders RJ expecting that they can deal a way to fly them. And we received the signal that our union is not going to fight for scope... there is more about to be revealed about how we may have interpreted that some of NWA's job protection provisions do not apply to ASA and Comair.
 
Last edited:
The Delta new hires that would flow to the top of the Compass list would make the same, if not slightly better, earnings. Most regionals now have trip / duty rigs, 401K matching, performance incentives and profit sharing .... our insurance was worlds better. To sum up, a DAL pilot could bid the left seat of Compass to make more money under current contracts without costing you any of your bargaining capital.

You're assuming DL would furlough a number exactly equal to the number of Compass captains.

A more realistic scenario: DL furloughs 1,000 pilots. A lucky 150 become Compass captains with no significant pay cut but horrendous work rules. An unluckier 150 become Compass FO's and the unluckiest of all are the 700 that are left to fend for themselves.

We'd better negotiate more flow-throughs if the economy continues the way it's headed.
 
I can’t speak for anyone else, but as a “regional” pilot, I’ll tell you what I feel entitled to:
I feel that I am entitled to some respect.
I feel that mainline pilots should recognize that I am not “steeling” their flying. They are “giving” it away every time they vote for a contract that reduces scope (noted- the 1113(c) process was a gun to the head).
I feel that mainline pilots should recognize that by allowing their company unlimited “regional” partners, without so much as stipulating that they be unionized, completely undermines my negotiating leverage.
I feel that senior mainline pilots who compare their career path to that of a young(er) pilot today are fooling themselves if they think it is the same.

Turbo
 
Not too much of a protectorate. More like what did the cat drag in - and I hear the sentiment is to cut them loose to form their own MEC ASAP. How long after that do you think they will attempt to rewrite the flow portion of their contract and thereby weaken furlough protection at DAL?

I hear your argument and totally agree that this would be attempted if we were to dissolve ourselves of Compass.

Fact of the matter is, Compass and Delta Air Lines have no choice in the matter. The flow up and flow down LOA is part of the JPWA. If any modifications were done it would have to be negotiated. Scary thought considering what was negotiated last week by our Negotiating Committee.

Here is little thread creep question for you though...

Has anyone spoken with any MEC officers and asked if they were in agreement with the direction the negotiating committee took to settle the 76 seat grievance?

The reason I ask is that I am afraid LM may be the one running the show here and he is not listening to the combined MEC. I have put my calls in to some of the MEC officers, including the negotiating chairman, and have not had any calls returned.

Any input on this would be appreciated. I think it will help us to understand who is running the show here and how cozy things are with Moak and management. At he special MEC meeting he admitted to having a good relationship with management which is not bad in itself, but when we continually have this scope creep and do NOTHING about it, one has to wonder if we need more of a militant stance.
 
Puff Driver:

Let me ask your response to this concept:

As we outsource flying our bargaining strength is decreased resulting in a long term negative trend of lower highs and lower lows.

I would agree to a certain extent. I would throw in that the negotiating environment has been less than friendly since C2K.

I would also throw in that our continuous outsourcing of flying STILL has us in control of events when it comes to leverage at Delta. No other entity flying for Delta can accomplish that. As of now, only one other entity working for Delta can approach it--the dispatchers. Pretty much only pilots can shut this airline down---should the need arise. IMO, we now have the populous which will indeed allow us to play that card if necessary.

I'm all for "taking it back" but we probably will have to do that through mergers. In the alternative we would have to exit ALPA (due to the legal conflict of interest) wait for a Section 6 opportunity and fight tooth and nail for scope.


Why do we have to leave ALPA? Delta has the option now for every 70 seater to be flown by Delta pilots. No doubt, there will be lawsuits from the idiots, but they'll sue again if they put the new Delta colors on their napkins claiming operational integration. They're just gonna sue, period.

Most regionals now have trip / duty rigs, 401K matching, performance incentives and profit sharing .... our insurance was worlds better. To sum up, a DAL pilot could bid the left seat of Compass to make more money under current contracts without costing you any of your bargaining capital.

Let's keep it real here. With regard to 401k, performance initiatives, work rules, YGTBSM. I went over to that other site to check out some info, and it's not even close. Let's just take Comair--since their is the "best" a max of .7 up to 5%. so a 100K pilot, who is contributing BTW gets 3500 from the company wheres the same pilot over here gets 12K and eventually 14k. That's just 401k. Nobody has profit sharing--which of course is moot if you are not making profits. However, if we hit the numbers they are projecting this year, we will each get about a months pay. I know nothing about their contracts, but I simply do not see, in my conversations with some of Mesaba, Comair former pilots, they the regionals are anywhere close to our contract. If APC is even in the same universe as the actual companies, the point is proven. There is MUCH to do in order to bring them up to par with us. You will not convince me to utilize the negotiating capital--let alone the necessary part of our workforce who won't even lend you an ear.


If we plotted outsourcing and your pay, with other airlines that do not outsource, you might be surprised to find that your bargaining power is increased as Delta pilots control more flying.

What airlines do not outsource? Allegiant, Spirit, Air Tran. Surely, you do not refer to SWA--they outsource. AirTran is about to from what I am hearing. I will take my compensation over theirs ANYDAY. Likewise with Spirit. Which leaves Allegiant, nuff said. I am waiting for the surprise, where is it? UPS, Fed Ex? Both outsource. I will also say that none of these airlines, including SWA have the scale that Delta has. We have yet to take the new Delta out for a spin to see what it will do. I will also add that none of these have been through BK, where you have the option to let the judge shoot you, or shoot yourself. I am looking forward to negotiations in a BK free environment, in a politically
more favorable environment, with hopefully a profitable company. Do I think that will happen? No. My next bet is AS in a merger, and then AF--that's Air France--in the following merger.

What else is a realistic way to reach our common goals?

Flow through, and regaining 70+ seat flying. That is our best bet. The kind of flow through that will get our MECs in close cooperation where the Mesaba and Comair MECs will want to cooperate in order not to lose their lucrative flow. I know you guys don't like to hear it, but that's about the best option, and it's pushing it at that. You've got 12k guys who will be chomping at the bit for a large raise due them, and rightfully so, in C12K. Trying to convince them to go after list mergers in order to get OTHER pilots raises is a non-starter. Trying to convince idiot Comair pilots of a staple prior to triggering merger policy is probably a non-starter as well. Anything less will be a non-starter with our guys. It is what it is.
 
I can’t speak for anyone else, but as a “regional” pilot, I’ll tell you what I feel entitled to:
I feel that I am entitled to some respect.
I feel that mainline pilots should recognize that I am not “steeling” their flying. They are “giving” it away every time they vote for a contract that reduces scope (noted- the 1113(c) process was a gun to the head).
I feel that mainline pilots should recognize that by allowing their company unlimited “regional” partners, without so much as stipulating that they be unionized, completely undermines my negotiating leverage.
I feel that senior mainline pilots who compare their career path to that of a young(er) pilot today are fooling themselves if they think it is the same.

Turbo

Yawn. Blather, blather, blather. Another regional pilot demanding respect. Whodathunkit.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom