What's up at Gemini?

[CaptSeth]

I disagree, regarding the debt and I may add all significant operational support effectively ended when the GAL transaction closed. M-P picked the operation with the highest labor costs, and deliberately tanked it.

World and NAA - if they are profitable now - are only so because of the HUGE windfall of business they recieved as a result of the lion's share of the AMC flying being re-directed to those properties. They'll look like hero's when they launch the IPO - at the expense of 2,500 ATA employees and their families.

How are our former DC-10's working out for you, by the way?

 

[MD11Drvr]

I disagree, regarding the debt and I may add all significant operational support effectively ended when the GAL transaction closed. M-P picked the operation with the highest labor costs, and deliberately tanked it.

World and NAA - if they are profitable now - are only so because of the HUGE windfall of business they recieved as a result of the lion's share of the AMC flying being re-directed to those properties. They'll look like hero's when they launch the IPO - at the expense of 2,500 ATA employees and their families.

How are our former DC-10's working out for you, by the way?

Where was the big difference in labor costs i.e. was it pilots/FA's/MX etc. The way I figured WOA's F/A's are making much more than either other groups and have a more resrictive contract in many ways. ATA's wide body was close but you had less than half of the pilot group on wide body pay as thier were mostly 737 and 757 crews. WOA is 430 at wide body rates and for Capt's is the same rate there is not a graduating scale. WOA has approx. 160 Capts on wide body pay for 20 +/- acft at the time of ATA's demise.

World was making money before GAL and still is that has not been a problem in the current DOD demands as for NAA not as far I have heard.

The DC-10's are a challenge but we have the advantage of 35+ years operating them and we did not suffer big losses of our best MX's like ATA did. When Fedex dropped ATA for performance issues it was too bad as the stars lined up against ATA. The way I see it the heavy checks were being done at SAT and they are hacks at best. ATA did not have the money to spend or the right facility add the wrong decision to do AMC instead of working out the kinks for a year did not help. The best MX's had left for greener pastures and ATA was using contract MX too heavily. Your MEL was pretty restrictive from what I had heard maybe poorly written. It took much longer to get the DC-10's on the program than forecast and MP lost patience which is why 3 were shuffled to WOA. I am glad to see more airframes but was not happy with the source. I have nothing but respect for ATA's crews got knee walking more than once with them and felt they were screwed. I do not however buy off on the notion WOA or NAA shares any of the blame and the debt is still there to MP and WOA will carry the lion share since we are making money. Last I heard NAA is not still and one thing for sure its tough to get reliable intel as much BS flies around and you have to sift through it all to make sense.

One last thing while we did pick up some flying we were pretty close to maxxxed out before but since ATA's demise NWA and United are regulars in KWI. In fact NWA got a 200 out of the desert just to pick up AMC and had it ready to go soon after ATA was gone. Maybe a little prior planning on thier part to partake of the Gov't cheese.

Take care and I have enjoyed the respectful exchange as I am concerned about the events that have unfolded and the ones to come. Brace,Brace, Brace comes to mind.

Take care and good luck! MD11Drvr

 

[dutch747]

MD11 Drvr, I don't think you will change Cat. Seth's mind. It's plainly obvious he has a chip on his shoulder and wants to place blame on fellow pilots instead of the corporate weenies or maybe his own company.

But I appreciate the posts, very educational.

 

[MD11Drvr]

MD11 Drvr, I don't think you will change Cat. Seth's mind. It's plainly obvious he has a chip on his shoulder and wants to place blame on fellow pilots instead of the corporate weenies or maybe his own company.

But I appreciate the posts, very educational.

Dutch,

I am not exactly trying to change anyones mind but just to expand my own. I reserve the right to "agree to disagree" at all times. I am sympathetic to the situation but still feel the bullet was down range with ATA long before MP and GAL. Its unfortunate but we are all along for the ride so to speak where it comes to incompetent management. Welcome to aviation in the 21st century.

 

[Bellerophon]

World and NAA - if they are profitable now - are only so because of the HUGE windfall of business they recieved as a result of the lion's share of the AMC flying being re-directed to those properties. They'll look like hero's when they launch the IPO - at the expense of 2,500 ATA employees and their families.

Total B.S. The only windfall was short lived, picking up the troops ATA left stranded. I will say this slowly, we are not on your AMC team. Your team picked up your long term flying (NWA and Omni). The only thing we got were 2 old DC-10's you could not run and $350 million of debt. Oh and when no one would lend ATA a dime in the end we (WOA) gave you (ATA) $20 million. Lay blame for your airline's demise somewhere else not WOA.

Too bad your lawsuit to take our seats did not work out. You might have been my captain. Now that would have been something, B737 FO to the street then straight to MD-11 Captain.


Bel

 

[CCDiscoB]

...HUGE windfall of business they recieved as a result of the lion's share of the AMC flying being re-directed to those properties....

You got a lot of nerve saying that! Hugh windfall...right...we had airplanes sitting around doing nothing. Lion's share!!! The 3 L-1011s brought in the lions share...SCOFF!! The 757 you say, AMC hates the 757!
You make it sound like we started AMC flying because ATA, the master's of AMC flying, failed. I guess for the past 60 years of flying for the military we've been waiting for that to happen.

 

[Megadeth]

I disagree, regarding the debt and I may add all significant operational support effectively ended when the GAL transaction closed. M-P picked the operation with the highest labor costs, and deliberately tanked it.

World and NAA - if they are profitable now - are only so because of the HUGE windfall of business they recieved as a result of the lion's share of the AMC flying being re-directed to those properties. They'll look like hero's when they launch the IPO - at the expense of 2,500 ATA employees and their families.

How are our former DC-10's working out for you, by the way?[/quote



Seth, do yourself a favor, focus your energy on getting a new job before 900 United Pilots hit the street and take them.

Your seat grab lawsuit failed, World did not bring this upon you.

As for the DC-10 comment.............we luv em.

MD

 

[dutch747]

Of the 4 DC-10's at ATA, only two were operating. One marginally so. If and I do MEAN "IF" we take delivery, we will only operate one of them. As for the 3 DC-10's GAL (NOT ATA but GAL) purchased, that were originally slated to go to ATA, but before they were operational, GAL decided to send them over to WOA. And like Magadeth says, we love those airplanes.

 

[billjohnson321]

Seth,the reason ATA was shuttered was very simple,they were losing tons of money.They ran through the millions that came with the World deal in a matter of months.As far as a windfall for World because of ATAs demise,you apparently are ignorant of the manner in which AMC flying is awarded.

 

[Hocus Focus]

Guys this scenario has been played out time and time again. I personally have been on the loosing end of this saga TWICE and its no fun. WOA has done the honorable thing and extended preferential hiring to the ATA guys of which they had entirely NO OBLIGATION to do so but merely as a measure of good faith. Alot of times when we spend an extended period of time at a place and we forget that this is business and companies come and go. A little refresher is to watch the movie "Wall Street", remember Blue Star Airlines and Mr. Gecko. The small guys are always affected because they pour their lifes blood into a company and formulate a loyalty and dedication that is not mutual. The anger will subside and hurt feelings will mend but just remember the guy you offend today could be your Chief Pilot tomorrow. The tsunami is still yet to crash ashore..wait till the majors start sh*t canning people in the fall, so get in where you fit in. Finally to all ATA aviators, Im sure WOA will embrace all that get aboard with a warm and heartfelt "WELCOME". There should be no axe to grind between ATA and WOA as both are pawns in a much larger game. Be smart do not go the way of the other two airlines fighting i.e. Hattfield Air versus McCoy Air Cargo PLEASE!!

 

[b19]

Not to change the subject.....

But what's up at Gemini?

 

[Palmtree Pilot]

They're in bankruptcy, they have terminated all pilots and FE under a year, the company is not paying those guys for the last to weeks of service, their corporate credit cards have been canceled and they are set to auction business and assets off in Aug.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601127&sid=auorTg0RWZBE&refer=law

On a lighter note, more than a hand full of GAC MD11 pilots are interviewing at World this week. All information that I have is from a friend at GAC.

PtP

 

[B747FR8DAWG]

Not to change the subject.....

But what's up at Gemini?

:laugh: I was just thinking the same thing

 

[dutch747]

They're in bankruptcy, they have terminated all pilots and FE under a year, the company is not paying those guys for the last to weeks of service, their corporate credit cards have been canceled and they are set to auction business and assets off in Aug.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601127&sid=auorTg0RWZBE&refer=law

On a lighter note, more than a hand full of GAC MD11 pilots are interviewing at World this week. All information that I have is from a friend at GAC.

PtP

I just got word from a good friend at Gemini that company is NOT going to pay back the pilot group for using their own credit cards for travel and hotels these last couple of months after they lost their AMEX account.

 

[propilot]

I just got word from a good friend at Gemini that company is NOT going to pay back the pilot group for using their own credit cards for travel and hotels these last couple of months after they lost their AMEX account.

I think that person should refile their expense report or stop spreading bad rumors. I've been reimbursed for all my expenses including ones on my personal card. That includes the expense report I put in yesterday that was approved for payment on my next(and last) paycheck. So has most everyone else I've spoken with. By the way, it hasn't been months since the cards were cancelled. It was only about a week and a half ago...right about the time the big announcement came along.