StaySeated
IBT does not represent ME
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2001
- Posts
- 782
I think I have some legitimate questions.
So far the answers have been the following:
1. The new local is better than the old local.
2. We are basically independent, except when it comes to everything that matters. In those cases, there is a really experienced local (1224) that we rely upon. Soooo we are not independent at all, except when we have to run against another independent union, we will say that we are an independent local, but we can't function without the assistance of other locals.
Definition of INDEPENDENT
1
: not dependent: as a (1) : not subject to control by others : self-governing (2) : not affiliated with a larger controlling unit <an independent bookstore> b (1) : not requiring or relying on something else: : not requiring or relying on others (as for care or livelihood)
Look, I am not saying that FAPA is the greatest thing ever, I am just a satisfied member. I think you would have a hard time finding a member of FAPA that is not happy with their level of representation.
Mr. Skyway FO says "Answer a lot more than FAPA, not here at 357 but the top leadership has been around the block a few times"
Again, you are independent when it suits your argument, but your not independent when you can't support your point of view with substance and experience.
Forget all of those other pesky and annoying questions about experience and ability. I understand how difficult those can be to answer.
Who will be on the representation ballot (If the IBT fails to obtain representation status without an election, which we all know they will attempt)?
Are we voting for Local 357? (This is the apparent "independent" union)
or
Are we voting for Local 1224? (This is the apparent "experienced" union)
or
Are we voting for the IBT? (This is the big bad IBT that no one likes so we sugar coat and hide them behind warm and fuzzy "locals")
This is not a personal attack on drizzle or skyway or any one of your new union guys that have stepped up to the plate. These are serious, legitimate questions that 3000+ pilots deserve to have answered.
So far the answers have been the following:
1. The new local is better than the old local.
2. We are basically independent, except when it comes to everything that matters. In those cases, there is a really experienced local (1224) that we rely upon. Soooo we are not independent at all, except when we have to run against another independent union, we will say that we are an independent local, but we can't function without the assistance of other locals.
Definition of INDEPENDENT
1
: not dependent: as a (1) : not subject to control by others : self-governing (2) : not affiliated with a larger controlling unit <an independent bookstore> b (1) : not requiring or relying on something else: : not requiring or relying on others (as for care or livelihood)
Look, I am not saying that FAPA is the greatest thing ever, I am just a satisfied member. I think you would have a hard time finding a member of FAPA that is not happy with their level of representation.
Mr. Skyway FO says "Answer a lot more than FAPA, not here at 357 but the top leadership has been around the block a few times"
Again, you are independent when it suits your argument, but your not independent when you can't support your point of view with substance and experience.
Forget all of those other pesky and annoying questions about experience and ability. I understand how difficult those can be to answer.
Who will be on the representation ballot (If the IBT fails to obtain representation status without an election, which we all know they will attempt)?
Are we voting for Local 357? (This is the apparent "independent" union)
or
Are we voting for Local 1224? (This is the apparent "experienced" union)
or
Are we voting for the IBT? (This is the big bad IBT that no one likes so we sugar coat and hide them behind warm and fuzzy "locals")
This is not a personal attack on drizzle or skyway or any one of your new union guys that have stepped up to the plate. These are serious, legitimate questions that 3000+ pilots deserve to have answered.