~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
You are correct - Pilot to Pilot is great for rebel rousing but it not so good as a conduit for objective information. Every P2P Rep wraps the facts in their own agenda (as do I) and if you have 10 P2P folks you will have 10 different messages.Tim47SIP said:Good luck you guys, I hope that the communication channels between the pilot group and the MEC are up and running!
Based on several pages of posts it is clearly evident that this is not the case. I haven't talked with anyone that has a clear view of what really is going on. This whole process is simply amazing to me. Good luck to all. we are going to need it.
The point of P2P is to communicate without writing anything down. If our positions were written someone like me would point out that management offers went from:
- Comair +1%
- Comair
- Contract Extention at current rates in exchange for growth (we could could have negotiated scope like Comair's in the process FWIW)
- Current book, minus Section 1, plus Section 13, less 8 to 18% pay on the CRJ700 with absolutely no objective growth guarantees
Also, ASA has a fairly diverse seniority list. Senior members of the CNC identify with the needs of a 57 year old pilot who would like his last 3 years to be his best (at any cost), while the junior members understand the need for growth and job protections over the long term.
P2P and rebel rousing will get a strike vote. However, it will take solid, objective, reasoning to give pilots the determination to see a strike through. At ASA we do not have a contract without a scope section which binds Skywest - so we have the moral imperative to strike, but that message is not completely understood and has not been communicated effectively.
We need to begin thinking about who we want for a Captain's Rep to replace Newie following his promotion. Hopefully we can get someone of his caliber, because he really has done an excellent job.
Last edited: