Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

EarthX battery for Experimental Aircraft

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neal
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 7

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Register   Log in
ve6yeq said:
Now, only if the ELT were as easy to remove and re-install...
Click to expand...
I personally don't have a problem with the ELT. I disconnect the antenna then with the seat completely tilted forward it's easy to access.
 
Neal said:
Specs comparison:

ETX-900: Dimensions: 6.5" L x 3" W x 6.6" H
ETX-1200: Dimensions: 6.5" L x 3" W x 6.6" H

Seems like a no brainer to me to now go with the ETX-1200 as someone else suggested a few days ago.
Click to expand...
Isn't the limiting factor when jumping up in CCA capabilities the gauge of the installed battery cable?
 

Share this page

Latest posts

Latest resources

Latest media

Carbon Cub FX-3 Shenandoah Valley
Carbon Cub at Kittyhawk
FX-3 in the backcountry
IFR Panel in a Carbon Cub FX-3
Cub-Provo-UT-c.jpg
Back
Top Bottom