Here fixed your wording for you........
Uhmm...if it was a slam dunk, why is getting dismissed?
Because the judges don't live in Phoenix!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here fixed your wording for you........
Uhmm...if it was a slam dunk, why is getting dismissed?
If you wish to find out you shall.
Heyas,
No skin in the game, but I warned everyone pulling for the West side about the Ninth Circuit. There was a VERY specific reason the appeal was filed there, and that strategem paid off.
Nu
Read the original trial transcripts and the ruling from the 9th and if that doesn't help you I'll tell you: the DFR violation is obvious when it becomes ripe.Uhmm...if it was a slam dunk, why is getting dismissed?
You're making a mistake to think reordering the seniority list to favor the East isn't a violation of DFR. You're now free to utilize your tyranny of the majority to negotiate and ratify a CBA. But do you really believe we won't file for another injunction and get one? From what I know of USAPA I fully expect them to again try to get around binding arbitration. I also fully expect them to again fail.I figure, in a few weeks, reality will sit in, and cooler heads will prevail on the west, and they will see the futility of fighting for the NIC. They will then have discussions with USAPA, and agreed upon integration can be brought forth. DOH with c/r's that protect both sides.
You're right. Arizona District courts are within the jurisdiction of the 9th. It would be a very poor strategy to appeal to the wrong court. Ask Mr. Seham about his "emergency" filing.There was a VERY specific reason the appeal was filed there,
Easties: understand what this means. The injunction is lifted so USAPA is free to negotiate whatever list it likes, but, if it again violates the DFR an injunction will stop it. So in effect we're back to were we were when USAPA won its election. Enjoy your victory.