You're offering your opinion. I didn't say anything about what might have happened. I only said AA made their decision to buy TWA based on conditions at that time. Then those conditions changed and your 20/20 hindsight is irrelevant.No, the APA protected its own and gave the TWAers the minimum they thought they could get away with. At least have the guts to admit it.
TWA Dude,
I'm offering an "opinion"?
Let's start over. First, an "opinion" is something based on something that hasn't happened before. We could go on for days with "opinions" of posters on what would happen with a 3 way merge of AA, BA and Iberia. You, I, and every other poster would be talking out of our arses for 28 pages on the ramifications of the actions of an international conglamerate. That is what an "opinion" is.
A decison based on facts, probabilities and general behavior predicted on past behavior is what TWA and AA pilots faced when the buyout happened.
What I posted extensively regarding TWA's operation in 2001 is a matter of fact. Much of the route system directly conflicted with the previous route decisons at AMR, and there was zero evidence that AMR was going to change it's behavior, that's fact not "opinion".
Now TWA Dude, If what I stated earlier is just an "opinion" of my predictions in 2001 of what was going to happen with TWA, please respectfully explain what your vision of what parts of the TWA operation would have been kept after 2001.
Would AMR have kept the short haul cities spoking out from STL on mainline B717's and MD-80's? What shred of evidence do you have that would have you think that AMR would somehow change their past behavior of eliminating this type of flying like they did with AirCal and Reno Air? Why exactly would a AA pilot think about merging these Captain jobs into the AA Captain jobs list when they knew this flying was gone in the future?.
What about the Cairo and Riyadh flying? Do you honestly think APA should have credited those jobs also? There was also discussion of "unused route authority". While I truly wished AA would have operated it like a great airline that TWA was, most of the cities went to Open Skies and weren't worth more than a "Go Daddy" web address.
The Caribbean "hub" is something I also would give squat for credit. I covered that in an earlier post.
Nothing has changed of my opinions from 2001 of what AMR had planned for TWA. Knowing their past behavior, the fate of TWA was not good. unfortunately, it went even worse than I imagined. You keep pushing an Arbitrator. Believe it or not, I'm all for it. Let's do it based on todays result. The ultimate test on whether TWA helped or hurt AA is what is left on the TWA system today. No B.S. about what a great airline it was in 2001. Put everything on the table, TWA routes, flights still operation, airport facilities, ect. Let the Arbitrator decide what percentage of the TWA system today still operates, and staff it with the TWA pilot required. Fire the excess pilots from either side.
Are you in?
I already know what every STL bidsheet looks like. If AA pilots were scarfing the old TWA system and cleaning up on upgrades over TWA guys, I'd agree with you. The facts are that TWA Captain's (not FO's on the street) fly most of their flying on AA routes as well as what little remains of the original TWA system.
It truly sucks. I wish they kept your flying, it would have worked well for all of us. It didn't, and somebody is left without a seat.