dual, thanks for the clarification. I tend to agree that the most likely outcome will have one winner and two losers (If Carty, Bethune and Mullin have their way, we all lose).
A true "one list" concept would require the trust and cooperation of all three parties concerned. If only ALL three parties had that courage, there would be no losers.
My feeling is that the most likely winner has never demonstrated that type of courage before and the Tiger is unlikely to change its "stripes" now.
Not with the REAL potential to eliminate corporate risk from organized labor once-and-for-all.
2003 going to bumpier ride than 2002.
*bing*
"please fasten seat belts".
A true "one list" concept would require the trust and cooperation of all three parties concerned. If only ALL three parties had that courage, there would be no losers.
My feeling is that the most likely winner has never demonstrated that type of courage before and the Tiger is unlikely to change its "stripes" now.
Not with the REAL potential to eliminate corporate risk from organized labor once-and-for-all.
2003 going to bumpier ride than 2002.
*bing*
"please fasten seat belts".