capt. megadeth
Metal Momma!
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2003
- Posts
- 2,898
WillowRunVortex said:Judging from your avitar, I would say you bare a striking resemblence to Dave Mustane!
Well, I am his sister.....he he

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WillowRunVortex said:Judging from your avitar, I would say you bare a striking resemblence to Dave Mustane!
WillowRunVortex said:" I just don't have a sponser!"
I'll be your sponser,,,havent had a drink in 3 in years
L'il J.Seinfeld said:UPS is an almost guarantee whereas SWA is just a good bet. 20 years from now UPS will most certainly be here. With SWA anything could happen. Look at Delta/United 5-7 years ago and look at them now. SWA is entirely different, but the comparison is still valid. The pax industry is fickle (sp).
UPS doesn't need airplanes to do what they do.
Basically....wrong.
UPS did own many of the airplanes prior to '88 and used contractors for the aircrews. While it is true that a union busting technique might be to contract out their flying, UPS needs airplanes as much as trucks to do what they do. The airline is by far the most profitable part of the company and UPS must offer time definite air freight to compete with the likes of FDX and DHL.
hoover said:I don't know if they "need" to compete with FDX or DHL. They are overnight freight companies. UPS does a lot of "non-overnight" delivery business. I don't know of anyone else who is doing that. It would certainly impact their business if they got out of the overnight delivery stuff, but not to the point making them unprofitable.
Just my opinion anyway
Flechas said:Still, the lifestyle is way better at UPS, at least that's what I think. If you have a family and only want to fly in the 48, stay with SWA.
What the He!! would you know about the "lifestyle" of a UPS pilot.
WillowRunVortex said:I will make a simple statement that is not a reply, just an observation. Why, when UPS made Billions last year, does it still do the contract tango thing with the pilots? Risk strike? Why? Incredible.
hoover said:I wouldn't say that UPS is almost guaranteed. Remember that UPS is not an airline. They are a package company that happens to use airplanes in their business. While the company has been around for upwards of 100 years, the aviation division didn't come along until 1988. Prior to that they didn't own an airplane. It was all contracted out. Nothing to say that it couldn't go back that way
On the other hand, SWA's business is entirely based on moving people in airplanes. Take away the airplanes and you have no business. As long as they can keep doing what they are doing they will be in business. UPS doesn't need airplanes to do what they do.
ERfly said:Same reason United management steals the pilots'/flight attendants/etc pensions and then gives themselves 2 million each in bonuses.
Widow's Son said:I've heard from a couple of UPS guys that the attitude there by management isn't very pilot friendly.
One guy described a bigwig coming into newhire class and telling the pilots to check their egos at the door because as far as UPS was concerned the guys who are really important to them are the guys driving the trucks and meeting the customers. He said if they had it their way the pilots would make the same as the truck drivers. If and when a nasty negotiation meltdown occurs, freight pilots are a whole lot easier to replace with foreigners or scabs than passenger pilots are.
Given those two choices, I would take SWA in a gnat's heartbeat. They are the cockroaches of airlines. They will be flying ugly painted aircraft a million years from now.
I would be willing to bet that there are more former UPS and FEdEx guys at SWA than the other way around. The job is important but family life is more important and the lifestyle at SWA is way more family friendly.
jhill said:What the He!! would you know about the "lifestyle" of a UPS pilot.
bluemoon said:Days Days Days. Don't die before your time, been there done it.