CFIT
Gimme your money
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2005
- Posts
- 821
I know if I were in a position to help effect the change that you want, I would delay and resist, simply based on your attitude and the ultimatum Letter. Many UAL pilots are commenting on the Letter and when Skywest comes up, they state that OO aren't even unionize and that they rejected ALPA.
Your statement has no merit, all of the other airlines that signed the letter are union, but of course you have to bring in ALPA to every discourse.
[quote\]Right or wrong, these are the realities that you are facing... based on in part by the choices you have made....[/quote]
Wrong again, these choices were made by UAL pilots, we all nknow if it was the other way it would be fixed immediately.
[quote\]In addition, what obligation or binding agreement does UAL or U-ALPA have to allow OO pilots priority on OO aircraft.[/quote]
They're SkyWest aircraft, the seats in back are regulated by UAL, NOT the jump seat.
[quote\]
Of course it makes common sense that OO pilots have j/s priority on their own airplane, but since Skywest has tied its dingy to the UAL monolith, it does come with certain conditions. ie Skywest serves UAL. OO flies where UAL says, when, what to put into its cargo bins, etc...
I do believe that OO pilots should have priority on their own jumpseats... but where is it binding or obligated. And how are the UAL pilots part of the equation? (I am not saying it does or doesn't, but asking the question... from there you state your case...)
It seems this is a OO to UAL managment issue.... not each individual OO pilot and UALPA. IN the meantime this is a PIC methodology.. not an ultimatum letter... Do you have Captains at Skywest or just "guys in the left seat?"[/quote]
Rez, pick a side and choose; either SkyWest gets priority on their own metal or you can chum up to your ALPA thugs and continue to have them kick pilots off of their own aircraft.
Pick one Rez, it's easy.