FoxHunter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2002
- Posts
- 679
CaptainMark said:believe me i fell lucky to be at fedex but i knew this whole aviation thing was a gamble..no guarantees..and we all knew we had to retire at 60
Until they change the rule.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CaptainMark said:believe me i fell lucky to be at fedex but i knew this whole aviation thing was a gamble..no guarantees..and we all knew we had to retire at 60
FoxHunter said:Until they change the rule.![]()
fr8doggie said:I understand the senate vote is scheduled for 13OCT07
Crawl back in your hole. You provide NO balance because you never have any positive ideas. Just doom and gloom. I'm very glad that you quit ALPA because the last thing we need is members who will not put the general welfare of the whole group above their own petty wants. Good riddance to you! You have no voice at FDX. Although I am sure there probably are 123 other pilots who think you give "balance". That's less than 3% of our total crewforce.
I can't believe it. There's a stench in the room and I'm actually responding to it.
Dan Roman said:Very well said tail, I'm still waiting for someone to come up with as thoughtful and balanced arguement for keeping 60 in place. So far all I'm hearing from those opposed to changing this discrimination are that they want to upgrade sooner and could care less about the thousands of pilots who have had a major wrench thrown into their retirement planning.
Snapshot said:Two Representatives have already withdrawn their sponsorship of H.R. 65.
Robert Wexler - FL
James Langevin -RI
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR00065@@P
Letters, phone calls, and emails DO make a difference. Instead of typing another post here about your feelings on the issue, why not type one out to the people that actually have direct input on it.
http://www.house.gov/transportation/
tailhookah said:Just let me fly until the mandatory federal retirement age... not some arbitrary age agreed upon over 3 decades ago. It's age discrimination... black and white.
Tail
General Lee said:Dan,
How about we extend the retirement age for policemen and firemen too? Would you like a 60 year old fireman carrying you out of a burning building down a flight of stairs? It would be dangerous. Not all of them are out of shape or weak, but most probably are. Same with pilots. After 30 years or more of flying, the reflexes go, and so does the hearing. It is best for everyone that they leave and not have the responsibility of carrying around 200-250 people etc. If they want to fly corporate or for fun, they should go for it, since it would likely involve less lives in the back.
The only reason this whole deal is being brought up really is because some pilots are now having problems with their pensions. This is a good lesson for everyone, to create your own portfolio, instead of hoping a faulty promise will come through. Our "excuse" for wanting to upgrade faster is equal to your "excuse" about not planning for yourself outside of company promises. The rule is there for a reason, and the Supreme Court ruled against those Southwest pilots who sued for discrimination.
Bye Bye--General Lee
You have the same option. Practice this, "Do you want to supersize it, sir?" You are naive if you think we will be able to retire at 60 or better yet,55, if the rules change. Many have lives outside of aviation and don't wish to fly until death. Furthermore, you can still practice your trade just not in 121. It doesn't improve safety and it won't change for purely financial convenience of a few or the lack of self worth for those who have no identity outside of being a "pilot". Start savin' and sell the bimmer, you aren't fooling anyone about being rich.if you are better off or just don't want to fly past 60, it's america... you don't have to. Go become a burger flipper for all I care.
There was time when certain people of color new their place was in the back of the bus. Things change for the better sometimes.
nyPhaedrus said:Holy schnikey. Surely you aren't comparing the age 60 rule to racial segregation? How about a Million Sexagenarian March on Washington?
"Swing Low, Sweet Boeing Bus, comin' for to fund my loans....."![]()