SWA today like the airline in the book, "Nuts!"?

[Phlintstone]

I heard there will be later sims... Just passing on stuff I hear...had dinner with a SWA ATL Cappy, he said things are un-LUVing there...showed me a photo of some men's room graffiti that was not very complimentary of SWA/SWAPA or GK...lot of Straight ahead looks when he said hello to the trannys, no fist fights though...

The morale in the crew room has been in the dumps for a while. I sat ready reserve for a few hours last month and you would've thought I was at a funeral. Guys don't want to talk to other AT guys let alone at SWA guy. It is depressing.

He must realize too that a lot of the guys (senior AT CAs) feel he has a slot that should be theirs. We can debate it forever and those individuals will always feel that way until they go back to the left seat and hold ATL.

Phred

 

[SWACheez]

Ready reserve would make morale suck

Ready Reserve? We don't have that here,nor do we want that. I had it in a previous airline life. WORST EVER IDEA IMHO!

 

[freightdogfred]

Strange talk here these days...

SWA cappy takin pics in the mens room, does he tap his foot in there too?
"Flattish contract" is ok, no real incentive or ability to improve it?
SWA 737-800 with "ETOPS" painted on the tail

Now that one made me LaughOutLoud

you guys really do do things different

 

[canyonblue]

...lot of Straight ahead looks when he said hello to the trannys...

Shell Shocked?

In the words of John McClane: Welcome to the party, pal!

 

[jball2]

The ATL crew room is definitely not as friendly, nice or "warm" as the others but other than that is has been cordial. I don't engage in the negativity so maybe I have missed it. A couple of folks have gone out of there way to say hi, and others just remain quiet. With the exception of two guys at the parking lot, even the folks on the bus have been friendly.

The problem here, as I see it, is we are all preprogrammed with expectations of each other. Unfortunately, those expectations have been built on hard feelings. Personally, if I throw my expectations out and treat everyone I meet with respect, I find that I m treated the same.

 

[PCL_128]

I'm as pissed off as anyone, and even I nod and say hi to the SWA guys I see. I haven't really seen any open animosity displayed by anyone on either side, in ATL or anywhere else. Now, if I ran across Steve Chase in the crew lounge, that might be a different story.

 

[Tripower455]

I'm as pissed off as anyone, and even I nod and say hi to the SWA guys I see. I haven't really seen any open animosity displayed by anyone on either side, in ATL or anywhere else. Now, if I ran across Steve Chase in the crew lounge, that might be a different story.

Funny, most SW guys feel the same way.......

 

[DonVerita]

Exactly why would there be a reason to accept a flat contract? You realize that "flattish" means exactly what we currently have, correct? We are not operating under a draconian bankruptcy imposed contract with terrible rates and rules. We will negotiate until we reach an improved CBA, there is no reason to do otherwise. With retro pay there is just no reason to stop the negotiating process until you reach a deal that gives you the gains that are necessary to get a yes vote. Flat is just another way to describe what we already have, there is absolutely no incentive to sign a new deal with no improvements.

On that note, a question: SWAPA agreed to fly the -800 at the same pay rate as the rest of the fleet. Did that agreement have an expiration date with a snap up provision to higher pay rate? If not, do you think your upcoming contract will have a separate pay category for the -800 and the -MAX?

For reference - AirTran did not fly the -800, but had options for them. If they had arrived on property, the AirTran contract already specified that those aircraft will see a 13% hourly pay increase over the -700 fleet.

 

[SWA Bubba]

On that note, a question: SWAPA agreed to fly the -800 at the same pay rate as the rest of the fleet. Did that agreement have an expiration date with a snap up provision to higher pay rate? If not, do you think your upcoming contract will have a separate pay category for the -800 and the -MAX?

For reference - AirTran did not fly the -800, but had options for them. If they had arrived on property, the AirTran contract already specified that those aircraft will see a 13% hourly pay increase over the -700 fleet.

This is part of the point.

We agreed to fly the -800 for the same rate (also, by the way, setting the precedent for keeping the same rate for the "smaller" 717, as it was scheduled to be on property), AND to fly near international for the same rate, with just an increase in international per diem. We also gave GK his quick agreement and a waiver to integrate the AirTran fleet and pilots to capture synergies. We did all this in record time. The fact that IT issues are now holding us back somewhat is immaterial.

So to directly answer your question: no, there's no "snapup" to a higher rate for the -800, nor do I think or expect that SWAPA is asking for a higher rate on the new contract. They're asking for across-the-board improvements, concentrating on three things: retirement, reserve, and overall compensation. Straight pay rates on the fleet will be the same: -300, -500, -700, and -800. That's the way the majority of the group polled.

For you AirTran guys (and General Lee, for some reason) who like to say that SWAPA "owes" GK for the way the SLI went down, I repeat that it's crap. We don't owe GK anything. There will be no concessions from SWAPA as a "payback." The SLI happened that way, because management wanted it to happen that way. And I believe that the negative aspects of the agreement were due to management's anger over the way ALPA handled the non-vote of the first deal.

Again, we already did our part. GK didn't do us a favor that needs to be paid back; we did him a favor that needs to be paid back. We did what management wanted, and said that they needed, to help the bottom line. We already gave at the office. We know this; management knows this; hell, everyone knows this. (Even General Lee knows this--he just won't admit it, because it undercuts some of his anti-SWA crap.) "Flattish" is management's opening position, because it's their job to try to keep expectations low. That's how negotiations work.

Bubba

 

[Kharma Police]

This is part of the point.

We agreed to fly the -800 for the same rate (also, by the way, setting the precedent for keeping the same rate for the "smaller" 717, as it was scheduled to be on property), AND to fly near international for the same rate, with just an increase in international per diem. We also gave GK his quick agreement and a waiver to integrate the AirTran fleet and pilots to capture synergies. We did all this in record time. The fact that IT issues are now holding us back somewhat is immaterial.

So to directly answer your question: no, there's no "snapup" to a higher rate for the -800, nor do I think or expect that SWAPA is asking for a higher rate on the new contract. They're asking for across-the-board improvements, concentrating on three things: retirement, reserve, and overall compensation. Straight pay rates on the fleet will be the same: -300, -500, -700, and -800. That's the way the majority of the group polled.

For you AirTran guys (and General Lee, for some reason) who like to say that SWAPA "owes" GK for the way the SLI went down, I repeat that it's crap. We don't owe GK anything. There will be no concessions from SWAPA as a "payback." The SLI happened that way, because management wanted it to happen that way. And I believe that the negative aspects of the agreement were due to management's anger over the way ALPA handled the non-vote of the first deal.

Again, we already did our part. GK didn't do us a favor that needs to be paid back; we did him a favor that needs to be paid back. We did what management wanted, and said that they needed, to help the bottom line. We already gave at the office. We know this; management knows this; hell, everyone knows this. (Even General Lee knows this--he just won't admit it, because it undercuts some of his anti-SWA crap.) "Flattish" is management's opening position, because it's their job to try to keep expectations low. That's how negotiations work.

Bubba

Get a clue, Gary Kelly didn't hire Randy Babbitt to be your bestie, he hired him to be a tough negotiator. Welcome to the real world of airline negotiations, good luck.

 

[PCL_128]

This is part of the point.

We agreed to fly the -800 for the same rate (also, by the way, setting the precedent for keeping the same rate for the "smaller" 717, as it was scheduled to be on property), AND to fly near international for the same rate, with just an increase in international per diem. We also gave GK his quick agreement and a waiver to integrate the AirTran fleet and pilots to capture synergies. We did all this in record time. The fact that IT issues are now holding us back somewhat is immaterial.

So to directly answer your question: no, there's no "snapup" to a higher rate for the -800, nor do I think or expect that SWAPA is asking for a higher rate on the new contract. They're asking for across-the-board improvements, concentrating on three things: retirement, reserve, and overall compensation. Straight pay rates on the fleet will be the same: -300, -500, -700, and -800. That's the way the majority of the group polled.

For you AirTran guys (and General Lee, for some reason) who like to say that SWAPA "owes" GK for the way the SLI went down, I repeat that it's crap. We don't owe GK anything. There will be no concessions from SWAPA as a "payback." The SLI happened that way, because management wanted it to happen that way. And I believe that the negative aspects of the agreement were due to management's anger over the way ALPA handled the non-vote of the first deal.

Again, we already did our part. GK didn't do us a favor that needs to be paid back; we did him a favor that needs to be paid back. We did what management wanted, and said that they needed, to help the bottom line. We already gave at the office. We know this; management knows this; hell, everyone knows this. (Even General Lee knows this--he just won't admit it, because it undercuts some of his anti-SWA crap.) "Flattish" is management's opening position, because it's their job to try to keep expectations low. That's how negotiations work.

Bubba

I'm glad you look at it that way. But I can guarantee you that Gary doesn't.

 

[HowardBorden]

I'm glad you look at it that way. But I can guarantee you that Gary doesn't.

Of course he doesn't, that's why we are still in the negotiation phase. We do have some easily quantifiable data points to use in making our arguments. Capacity was allowed to grow with no increase in crew costs. Recent record revenues are directly linked to operating larger aircraft with similar operating costs but carrying more revenue generating passengers. We are profitable, there are many arguments to be made concerning the pilots slice of that pie.

 

[SWA Bubba]

Get a clue, Gary Kelly didn't hire Randy Babbitt to be your bestie, he hired him to be a tough negotiator. Welcome to the real world of airline negotiations, good luck.

I have a clue. And I know that Randy Babbitt is here to be a negotiator for the company. Duh. They have their positions, and we have ours. We're negotiating. All I said was that SWAPA's recent contributions are recognizable to all.

Bubba

 

[SWA Bubba]

I'm glad you look at it that way. But I can guarantee you that Gary doesn't.

Sure; I'm an optimist by nature.

My post was primarily for all the pessimists and haters out there clamoring about SWAPA giving "concessions" to the company. Negotiations are negotiations, no matter what two entities are involved. And since the company's opening position was "flattish," i.e. NOT even starting off asking for concessions, I have a hard time taking any of those haters' positions on SWAPA needing to "give back to the company" seriously. You know?

Bubba

 

[Kharma Police]

I have a clue. And I know that Randy Babbitt is here to be a negotiator for the company. Duh. They have their positions, and we have ours. We're negotiating. All I said was that SWAPA's recent contributions are recognizable to all.

Bubba

Not trying to throw stones since I'm by default part of the "family" but since you have already gladly given them pretty much everything they want (with no provision to get it back), you have nothing to negotiate other than to try and keep what you have. Good luck SWAPA, we're all counting on you.....