Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA culture!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I don't for a minute think anyone says SWA is better, it's just being proud of what they have now. What do they have? A contract which dollar for dollar over the years has grown at inflation pace to keep the exact same relative pay today that SWA pilots had in 1973. In other words, an hourly rate today of $211 was $38 in 1971. That shows you how crappy this industry has been for decades.


True statement there. Interesting to note that when ALPA (UAL DAL etc.) attained the pay rates they did in the 90's some raised eyebrows, but in fact they were not even keeping up with inflation. Back than a SWA pilot was way below a UAL pilot in compensation (although not as far behind as in 1973) but now they have kind of followed the turtle and hare scenario, slow steady progress.
Had the industry not been hit by the perfect storm of 2001 airline pilot pay would be a lot better and tickets would just be a little higher (or more realistically management bonus's less) but air travel would still be a bargain.
 
Fubi-
No one is saying we are better aviators - we are saying that we have the better, more difficult to get, JOB.
A LOT of people didn't have the money for the type, including me. Hell, I didn't have the money for flight school! But I figured it out bc I really wanted to be here. (and still do and consider that sacrifice the best investment I ever made)
Your statement highlights just 1 of the additional sacrifices Swapa pilots made to get the job. IMO, that's relevant.
Back in the day, you weren't willing to scrap, save, beg, or rearrange your finances for $8k - and took the job that didn't need it. IMO- that's a choice you can live with, but ought not be rewarded.


Wave, using your line of reasoning here would be like saying if two regionals merged and one was a pay for training outfit, the PFT airline should get preferential treatment in a merger because it was more difficult to attain the job?? The PFT pilots shelled out thousands so it should be rewarded?
 
We = All Air Tran Pilots minus Ty Webb and PCL.

The day I interviewed at Southwest there were 12 in my group, they only hired 2. The day I interviewed at Air Tran (@ Air Inc.) there were 6 of us, they hired 5.

All that says is AirTran does a better job of prescreening potential candidates. I hope you don't think that the 2 hired were "better" than the 10 they turned away. Interviewing is a crapshoot, not an indication of the best guy wins. We have all been around this business long enough to be aware of that.
Grasping for straws there dude! If you somehow think your analogy proves some sort of SWA superiority we might have a clue to some of the SWA narcissism being exhibited on here.
 
Wave, using your line of reasoning here would be like saying if two regionals merged and one was a pay for training outfit, the PFT airline should get preferential treatment in a merger because it was more difficult to attain the job?? The PFT pilots shelled out thousands so it should be rewarded?

Seriously Dan?
The old PFT schtick - there's no anology in the 90's regionals- now I'm pretty sure you're stealing food off ScopeoutRJs plate by stealing his bit. The truth is, SWA is and always has been a more difficult and time consuming job to attain- especially in the 10 years since 9/11. I argue that this is relevant in a SLI debate bc it takes years longer to meet the competitive mins- you can disagree on that if you like- but that particular argument's just flame. Welcome to troll status.
 
Funny, they just don't believe anything. They forget how hard it was for them to get a "decent" contract from Tranny management, but our contract was just handed to us by Herb.... Their mighty ALPA took a strike vote to show their management they meant business. Since we got better results and a better contact, now it was just given to us, funny.

We got an FO at 87% on the tranny list, actually pressing the test button. His career earnings just went up by 2,000,000 and he still wants more, he wants all those SWA guys below him. Unreal, ungrateful and sad.

There is a real culture here at Southwest and some of you will never "get it".
 
Last edited:
Wave, using your line of reasoning here would be like saying if two regionals merged and one was a pay for training outfit, the PFT airline should get preferential treatment in a merger because it was more difficult to attain the job?? The PFT pilots shelled out thousands so it should be rewarded?

Dan just how bad do you hate SWA?. FYI getting a 737 type does not get someone a job at SWA. But hay enjoy what you seem to do every waking moment ( slam and hate on SWA )

Get out there is a lot to see and do.
 
I received my type from a previous airline but you are right, SWA is a PFT.

They paid ME while I was in Training.
 
Wow, now we've come full circle..... Back to the PFT idiocy....... Ask PCL about really PAYING FOR TRAINING, then ask any SW guy about it and compare experiences. I'll give you a hint. One empties tens of thousands of dollars OUT of your bank account. The other puts hundreds of thousands INTO it.

All we need now is for the virtual pilots, OYSterGLEEk to chime in on how bad it is do LBB layovers, and the thread can be locked, as all of the FI circle jerk arguments will be covered by one thread!

Great job!
 
Therein lies the million dollar question. What is the magic equation that will give a reasonble outcome for current WN pilots while doing as little damage to the FL pilots seniority wise (contract and pay withstanding).

It is interesting to note that the well verbalized concerns of some WN posters places so much emphasis on seniority, when other WN posters try to tell the FL guys that seniority and seat don't matter, it's all about the pay and contract.

You seem unwilling to acknowledge the link between seniority and career earnings expectations. For ATN pilots, your career earnings will increase dramatically regardless of your seniority. For SWA pilots, numerous seniority models will decrease our career earnings expectations. How you can think it's fair for some ATN pilots to earn an additional 1-2 million over their career while some SWA pilots take a loss is concerning.

It's not about beating the ATN pilots, its simply about protecting the career value of our pilots. It hardly seems unfair to protect our value while increasing yours.
 
You seem unwilling to acknowledge the link between seniority and career earnings expectations. For ATN pilots, your career earnings will increase dramatically regardless of your seniority. For SWA pilots, numerous seniority models will decrease our career earnings expectations. How you can think it's fair for some ATN pilots to earn an additional 1-2 million over their career while some SWA pilots take a loss is concerning.

It's not about beating the ATN pilots, its simply about protecting the career value of our pilots. It hardly seems unfair to protect our value while increasing yours.

Gimme a break. You really are concerned about retiring #10 vs. # 410?
 
It's not about beating the ATN pilots, its simply about protecting the career value of our pilots. It hardly seems unfair to protect our value while increasing yours.

A straight relative seniority or DOH integration does not protect the career value of all of the SWA pilots.

This is a very reasonable (not greedy) concern.
 
How are SWA pilots taking a loss in pay? Nothing is going to change- you will come to work, work your 3 day/ 4 day and go home. I DO NOT understand Pilots mad at other Pilots? Did they ask you about buying Airtran? didn't ask me? DO they CARE what YOU think=NO NO !! Everyone try to start to think positive, what will SWA look like in 2015-2017 International? Hawaii? Larger aircraft? More bases?

SWA Senior FOs will upgrade in 2011,2012,2013 with the purchase of Airtran. Thanks for the Airtran's order of 50 737s.

No purchase of Airtran and when would you upgrade?? WHEN? Only replacement aircraft orders, for the aging 300-500s. maybe 2013 2014 with retirements??

SWA gets the WORLDS busiest airport, Intl routes= means MORE $ bigger Profit Sharing=$

I see alot of positives for everyone.
 
JJ,

Retiring #410 vs. #10 is, indeed, a decrease in career expectations that impacts the SWA pilot for years leading up to retirement. Take the emotion out of it. It's quantifiable. Your list is younger and ours has more retirements. That needs to be addressed.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom