Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest Airlines Expands Atlanta Service With Two New Nonstop Destinations

  • Thread starter Thread starter SWA/FO
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 40

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Wait till SWA lands on 28 and then has to taxi to ramp 3 at 9am for a 30 min. turn. They will feel the LUV then.


that won't be a problem...it will be like Philly where the times are padded. As long as the WX holds up ATL should be ok. Trust me, they have this already figured out. ATL is very busy but also very efficient. Very LAX like...yes 30 or 35 min turns will not be a problem in ATL either. There are days when it won't happen, but those are the same days where everyone will be impacted. I have seen Philly flights with an extra 45 minutes of padding. We leave the gate takeoff 45 mins later and are still on time.
 
You guys need to dig a little deeper than the obvious. SWA didn't buy Morris for its SLC ops. As was pointed out, SLC is a relatively small O&D city. Rather, SWA bought them for instant access to many of Morris' other cities (i.e. SEA, PDX) in the face of the new and unknown United Shuttle. That kind of quick reassessment of competition allowed SWA(and has allowed them in other situations) to get a foot in the door and, ultimately, beat back the Shuttle. God knows we all know how THAT turned out.

Mock SWA all you want, but there are very few places where they failed, NO places they don't make money, they haven't furloughed and they haven't been bankrupt. They just keep on keepin' on.

If SWA perceives that the Air Tran thing isn't going to work as they had hoped they most definitely, based on their history, can (and will?) amend their original plan, possibly in ways that the Air Tran folks won't be happy with.

They are a wicked good competitor.
 
Last edited:
If SWA perceives that the Air Tran thing isn't going to work as they had hoped they most definitely, based on their history, can (and will?) amend their original plan, possibly in ways that the Air Tran folks won't be happy with.

Question:

Why is it so important for you guys to threaten (or convey threats of the GO)? Is it that you're truly concerned for our well being? Or is it just to mock? I honestly can't figure out what purpose it serves.

I fully understand that when I get to vote that it will not be a vote on the SL,I but a vote on whether to stay employed. SW pilots, on the other hand will be voting on the solely on the merits of the SLI.

Big difference.

Hence the first question.
 
MUSIC,

My understanding is that SWA mgmt talked "straight" with your MC when they presented the last SL (Mike VDV specifically)...is that threat or cold hard realities in tough economic times...?
 
Question:

Why is it so important for you guys to threaten (or convey threats of the GO)? Is it that you're truly concerned for our well being? Or is it just to mock?.

Music,

You do understand the reality of what's ahead, right? Put your head in the sand if you like. No fear mongering when the facts are the facts.

And I'm not even sure Laker works for SW.
 
MUSIC,

My understanding is that SWA mgmt talked "straight" with your MC when they presented the last SL (Mike VDV specifically)...is that threat or cold hard realities in tough economic times...?

I can't answer that with any certainty. What I can say is that this whole process has been difficult to understand.

How you ask?

First we negotiate a Process Agreement Yet it's clear that this was just done placate our union. The reality is that there was never any intent to follow it to its ultimate outcome (if that would have been necessary). Furthermore, this was to have been a "Labor" negotiation between two unions, NOT Labor and Management, which has been the case.

Now, the reality is what it is. It doesn't change the fact that I will be voting on an agreement to be employed and you will be voting on an agreement that effects your seniority position. Economics or not, our voting positions are by far, disparate.

Make no mistake, I will put this behind me (in fact I already have) because there is only one way for me to vote. I live my life as an optimist and will look forward to the future, no matter what that entails.
 
Last edited:
Music,

You do understand the reality of what's ahead, right? Put your head in the sand if you like. No fear mongering when the facts are the facts.

And I'm not even sure Laker works for SW.

Red,

Why do you keep hitting me with the ostrich comment?

I don't believe I have stated any sort of opinion, other than that I am FULLY aware of the situation. If anything, I'm only trying to find out why there is this need for some on your side to consistently bring up this threat (economic reality, truth, inevitability, or whatever else you want to call it, etc.). It's still a valid question because, because it points to overall "character" of those making the statement.

BTW, I don't know if Laker works for SW or not. IMHO, it's irrelevant to the two questions I asked. If I implied that, I did so in error.
 
Last edited:
I think Music gets it along with more and more rank and file. I know my blunt opinions were directed more at two other groups. PCL, Ty and a few other Airtran guys whom most of us at SWA know their identities and Trolls from other airlines who for various reasons hate SWA. Both groups are playing fast and loose with careers that are paying salaries between 100 and 300 grand. One group is hateful. The other is stupid. This is reality plain and simple.

I have dealt with two management groups in my career. First, Frank Lorenzo,Phil Bakes and Joe Leonard. Second, Herb Kelleher, Colleen Barrett and Gary Kelly. I like Herb,Colleen and Gary more, but I also fear pissing them off much,much more....they are infinitely smarter than the first three jerks. Take it for what it's worth....
 
Last edited:
Question:

Why is it so important for you guys to threaten (or convey threats of the GO)? Is it that you're truly concerned for our well being? Or is it just to mock? I honestly can't figure out what purpose it serves.

I fully understand that when I get to vote that it will not be a vote on the SL,I but a vote on whether to stay employed. SW pilots, on the other hand will be voting on the solely on the merits of the SLI.

Big difference.

Hence the first question.

Not mocking. No threats. I don't have a dog in the hunt. I was just pointing out that SWA is a fearsome competitor and if people think LUV means they're all touchy and feely, they are misreading history. How it shakes out for Air Tran or SWAPA remains to be seen.

Many of us have found, to our everlasting chagrin, that even the much-loved Kelleher can be one helluva guy to jerk around. He's all business first and foremost. The Wild Turkey is a side show.

All I'm saying is, one has to deal with him as he really is not how he is portrayed in the legend or the media. That's not a threat. Just a reality. Those who have blown off SWA as a lightweight or laughed at Kelleher's antics have lived to regret it.
 
Last edited:
Never. The definition of scabbing is specific.

Not that specific, but who cares, you can rationalize anything. In any event there is a sort of widespread belief that the arrogance and sense of entitlement displayed by SWAPA is above and beyond. Your 11 year co-pilots are determined to get ahead no matter who they step on in the process and it's no accident that SWAPA has probably blown the opportunity to merge twice in a row. I can see why Herb and Kelly are getting a little desperate. No merger, no growth and the entire business plan depends upon growth. That's the downside of the de-regulation business model.
 
Not that specific, but who cares...

SWAPA has probably blown the opportunity to merge twice in a row.

Scab - One who flies legally struck work by crossing a line, refusing to strike, or while flying for another carrier.

I challenge you to show me another definition that applies to pilots.

You have how many hours and don't know what a scab is? Don't throw around that word like it's a regular insult. Call us d***heads or a**holes if you wish. Reserve SCAB for when it's appropriate. SWA has a few...AT has a few more. NOTHING to do with this SLI stuff.

shootr

PS SWAPA blew it? Are you insane?
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom