BOYCAPTAIN
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2008
- Posts
- 270
Wow, somebody loves himself.LOL![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, somebody loves himself.LOL![]()
I sincerely respect your career path - you definitely didn't take any shortcuts. With that being said don't take the following comments as personal insult:
What's with the arrogance of some of the Riddle guys? They act as if it was a "most selective" university, requiring 1400+ SAT scores and 3.8+ GPAs. It wasn't at all an academically competitive school; that's one of the biggest reasons I didn't apply. I'm sure it had a great aviation department, but a lot of guys I encounter brag as if they went to Stanford or Harvard.
Oh, *SMACK*!this little face means "a joke"...kinda like your CAL interview. LOL LOL LOL
Did you work without medical insurance for the first year at CAL?
Didn't Skybus new hires make more than CAL new hires?
Yeah, that's what I thought. LOL
Why is UND/ERAU not as bad as GA? What do these schools do that an FBO and a degree via community college and a local univeristy can't, except require cash payout... just like GA. But you tell me how you see it...........
So its ok to judge Gulfstreamers cause they went there... but bad to judge your abilities to fly and get jobs based on your gender? got it....
Pot meet kettle...???
He was harsh... and apologized. He also has said GA was a mistake. He was young and dumb... Like all of us....
Have you done anything dumb when you were young? I have... he did... and he has the ability to admit it... Can you?
Funny...the only thing I learned in college involvesd copious amounts of alcohol and hot freshman girls. So, yeah...maybe you're right about pilots needing a "college education".
Training education environment vs. whoring for a job. The whoring for the job is what really lowers the bar in this industry. It is not even in the same universe in comparing the two situations.
Training education environment vs. whoring for a job. The whoring for the job is what really lowers the bar in this industry. It is not even in the same universe in comparing the two situations.
Best statement yet on this thread. From Gulfstream's website:
http://www.gulfstreamacademy.com/First_officer.php
They actually pride themselves with the idea that you will be a professional airline pilot without having to go through the interview process. Would you want to be treated by doctors who bought their way into a medical clinic without having to interview? How how you think other doctors in the medical profession would view that?
Problem is you haven't compared the two. I am open on this... so explain how going GA destroys the profession... really what we are talking about it is the economics of it...
How does it lower the bar... How do GA pilots take money out of your pocket?
Are they board certified?
So what do you say to GA pilots now working at jB, FX, UAL, CAL, AA, SWA... etc....
There's a big difference between GIA and other training programs: unsuspecting passengers are brought along for the ride, and they don't know that there's a student pilot in the cockpit when they buy the ticket.
When an apprentice cuts your hair or a high school auto shop fixes your car, you're fully aware, and you get a significant discount for the risk. With GIA, you buy a ticket on Continental and, unless you're in this industry, you have no idea that the copilots for this airline are paying customers.
However, if you look at GA as a training program and not a job.... granted GA right seat pilots are performing work... much like ab initio programs globally.
But take your example and compare it to the 1990's when pilots paid 10K to work at ACA, Express Jet, Pinnacle, etc... Are those guys scabish? And of course what about SWA?
However, if you look at GA as a training program and not a job.... granted GA right seat pilots are performing work... much like ab initio programs globally. And what of the new MPL? How are we going to treat those guys? (basically MPL will do for Airbus and Boeing operators what Gulfstream does for BE-1900's.... 300 hour pilots flying Airbus and Boeing... )
But take your example and compare it to the 1990's when pilots paid 10K to work at ACA, Express Jet, Pinnacle, etc... Are those guys scabish? And of course what about SWA?
I don't know how it works at GIA now, but it used to be that you had to pass a simulator ride and a written test to get hired as a PFT FO at GIA. About a quarter of the applicants didn't make it to class. No different than an interview process.Those airlines that had pay for training still required passing an interview. You didn't just buy your job outright.
The PFT pilots at GIA aren't "student pilots." They have the same number of hours that many students at the RJ operators have nowadays. I used to fly with plenty of 250-500 hour pilots at PCL. No different than what GIA is getting. The GIA pilots have to pass 121 training just like any other pilot, the only difference is that they're paying for it instead of the airline.There's a big difference between GIA and other training programs: unsuspecting passengers are brought along for the ride, and they don't know that there's a student pilot in the cockpit when they buy the ticket.
When an apprentice cuts your hair or a high school auto shop fixes your car, you're fully aware, and you get a significant discount for the risk. With GIA, you buy a ticket on Continental and, unless you're in this industry, you have no idea that the copilots for this airline are paying customers.
The question is...how will we treat them? Will we treat them as second class B scale pilots, thus allowing management to play us against each other?
The PFT pilots at GIA aren't "student pilots." They have the same number of hours that many students at the RJ operators have nowadays. I used to fly with plenty of 250-500 hour pilots at PCL. No different than what GIA is getting. The GIA pilots have to pass 121 training just like any other pilot, the only difference is that they're paying for it instead of the airline.
Not really. Does anyone truly give honest answers to those questions, anyway? It's all BS. Kit Darby makes a fortune by telling people how to BS their way through interviews.Interviewing which involves explaining your strengths and weaknesses is a very humbling experience.
Hey, I'm not arguing in favor of the 'stream, I'm just saying that throwing the pilots under the bus isn't a wise move. Thousands upon thousands of pilots have PFTed in the last two decades. Most of them are at majors now and are your union brothers. Some of them are union reps. Does it really make sense to attack them and alienate them for the rest of their careers for a mistake they made when they were newbies? That's up to you to decide.At the excessive price of 30 grand (what the heck), that appears to be way out there in the ethical department.