Turtle21
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Posts
- 1,683
DFR trial, part deux. There's no way another jury would come to the same unanimous verdict in under two hours of deliberation again, right?
If you say so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DFR trial, part deux. There's no way another jury would come to the same unanimous verdict in under two hours of deliberation again, right?
Yeah, the law. Tashima and Graber already sent their condolences. What more do you want?
Wrong.
AWA actually attained major status before Southwest.
AWA pilots negotiated two working agreements.
The first one was negotiated and ratified under the auspices of chapter 11 bankruptcy. First year pay was the highest of any major.
The second agreement was negotiated under the covenants proscribed by the ATSB in the wake of the 9-11 attacks. This agreement still brought raises and improved scheduling. Better schedules than USAir east pilot have.
While AWA pilots were able to improve pay and working conditions while having to fight chapter 11 and then the ATSB the USAir pilots were giving everything they could think of away. The let my Daddy vote campaign (i.e. we are scared of everything Mr. Management Man, please make the bad times go away.)
In other words; pathetic behavior by the east pilots.
AWA was profitable. In fact AWA had to cover USAir's payroll for the first six months after the merger was announced.
USAir was pretty close to death. I know that because we have a few pilots who did free lance Airbus repositioning flying. I personally know of two pilots who were put on standby by GE to move USAir airbuses to temporary staging in the desert.
USAir would have liquidated and AWA would have lived years longer and would have had several opportunities to merge with other carriers. In addition, the vacuum left by the death of USAir would have provided growth opportunities for all remaining carriers with access to capitol.
AWA had access to capitol.
You have been consistently wrong about everything so why should anyone listen to a PFT Gulfstream washout?
Not only are you a PFT loser but you were not even smart enough to go to a place where you could get your money's worth.
You could not even buy a job successfully.
What is your obsession with USAir east?
You don't work there and based on your stellar aviation trajectory you likely will never see the flightdeck of any major airline. Which is a good thing.
Your daddy must be a really bitter guy. Probably because he thinks his twelve years of furlough time should place him senior to a west captain.
Both he and you are delusional and none too bright.
Carl, there must be some concern on the part of the elected representatives at USAPA that the 9th was not so iron clad in its ruling. Otherwise, how to explain their refusal to meet with those they are elected to represent? I would call the spin they are putting out more what USAPA hopes the 9th meant with their ruling.
Remind me again, what did Tashima and Graber rule on? Was is merit or ripeness?
Did you read Lance's latest missive?USAPA had five complaints in the appeal, the first being ripeness, the others being merits were not ruled on since the entire case was dismissed. Wake was ordered to vacate his erroneous injunction that prevented the union from freely dealing with the internal union dispute according to the DFR standard of the SCOTUS.
Thanks for askin'.
USAPA had five complaints in the appeal, the first being ripeness, the others being merits were not ruled on since the entire case was dismissed. Wake was ordered to vacate his erroneous injunction that prevented the union from freely dealing with the internal union dispute according to the DFR standard of the SCOTUS.
Thanks for askin'.
USAPA had five complaints in the appeal, the first being ripeness, the others being merits were not ruled on since the entire case was dismissed. Wake was ordered to vacate his erroneous injunction that prevented the union from freely dealing with the internal union dispute according to the DFR standard of the SCOTUS.
Thanks for askin'.
Okay, then why refuse to meet with the west pilots? If there is no legal reason not to? I keep asking and you folks keep not answering.
Okay, then why refuse to meet with the west pilots? If there is no legal reason not to? I keep asking and you folks keep not answering.
"keep not answering"?? Who's the DMF NOW!!
Simple, because the don't REALLY represent us.....
Simple, because the don't REALLY represent us.....
Simple, because theY don't REALLY represent us.....
The USAIR is fine with separate ops. So are the majority of East pilots. Lets just do the MDA thing. Like MDA=Same certificate, Same dispatchers and schedulers. Like MDA, the only thing you can not do is bid over. According to West posters that would be ok. Because that is how MDA was treated. According to West pilots MDA was not USAIR, just like AWA pilot group is not USAIR. If it would be, you could bid the 330 or the 767 or the 190. Since you can not bid these positions like the MDA pilots, you should not be considered USAIR pilots and if we merge we will count the WEST just like MDA. Non existent. Fair? Right.
M
Marty, Marty, Marty...when are you going to accept the fact the OLD USAir is dead? It's GONE.