TWA Dude
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 3,666
You mean not until a court ruling finally settles it. The company's complaint for declaratory judgment aims to do just that.But as long as the East sticks with the "gold Standard" and the West sticks with "NIC or bust" nothing will get accomplished.
Why must there be a middle ground? Under ALPA we were two sides negotiating as equals. Now the West is a minority where the majority intends to impose a list favorable to them. There is no middle ground because the majority doesn't want there to be any. The USAPA-conceived list is favorable to the East and no C&Rs can alter the fact that it makes the West their furlough-fodder.As I have said before there must be middle ground.
When you say the West should compromise what you're really saying is the West should concede. I guess if it weren't for contract law and the RLA being on our side perhaps we would. The DFR trial proved to everybody except Lee $eham that USAPA does NOT have the right to impose a list of their choosing on us. And it doesn't matter that you disagree because Parker and his lawyers see a second DFR trial as a likelihood.