He didn't castrate them, the Alaska pilots castrated themselves with such an ureasonable contract.
You don't have the slightest idea what your talking about. Please stay in the RJ and keep your MEII current.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn't castrate them, the Alaska pilots castrated themselves with such an ureasonable contract.
Huh? I wrote, "It's simply not wise to assume an outcome based on how long it takes." (Confession: the word "long" got left out. Sorry.) What part of that don't you understand?"Wise"??? Are you kidding me? We are just waiting on a decision by a man. What is wise or not wise about waiting on a decision?
You mean, why did your elected reps do that. My guess is having a bankruptcy judge breathing down their throats along with the threat of liquidation had some effect.Why did the "wise" and wonderful ALPA put an end date in that SENTENCE?
Not meaningless. Including amendable dates in RLA contracts is routine. A snapback is never implied unless explicitly stated.If that end date was meaningless then why put it in?
So now with the epithets, huh. The only thing worse than calling me 'management' would be calling me an 'Eastie'. Don't even think about it.Go on with your expertise of the RLA and explain to me the status quo provision...you need to get a job in management.
Huh? I wrote, "It's simply not wise to assume an outcome based on how long it takes." (Confession: the word "long" got left out. Sorry.) What part of that don't you understand?You mean, why did your elected reps do that. My guess is having a bankruptcy judge breathing down their throats along with the threat of liquidation had some effect. Not meaningless. Including amendable dates in RLA contracts is routine. A snapback is never implied unless explicitly stated.So now with the epithets, huh. The only thing worse than calling me 'management' would be calling me an 'Eastie'. Don't even think about it.
That process is our only means...only means of solving a dispute
You're joking right? I hate to break this to you but you can't be selective about which "final and binding" arbitration is valid and which one is not.
You guys brought all this misery upon yourselves. The question is, "when will you have had enough"?
I personally hope the East gets everything they asked for. The reality is this East West struggle affects a small portion of the big puzzle. All of us benifit every time a pilot group makes more money, especially those of us in negotiations.
It will be interesting to see if the East gets the raise and USAPA takes the stance that the west should be brought up to their wages how many will bitch about that.
My schadenfreude is small consolation for the harm you've caused us.If you are happy that our only means of solving a dispute with management is taking years than I think you would be great in management.
You want to continue complaining about how long arbitrators take then more power to you. My only response was to you was thinking the length had something to do with the complexity of the case and therefore somehow favored the pilots. It doesn't.He had surgery big deal.
Calling a regular union-member pilot (and democrat) a management type is indeed an epithet. But at least nobody can call me an Eastie.Epithets?...really?
My schadenfreude gesundheit is small consolation for the harm you've caused us.You want to continue complaining about how long arbitrators take then more power to you. Management is very happy about it and you seem to be too so all I'm saying is you have this in common with management. My only response was to you was thinking the length had something to do with the complexity of the case and therefore somehow favored the pilots. It doesn't.Calling a regular union-member pilot (and democrat) a management type is indeed an epithet. OK I wont do it anymore you slimy liberal (just kidding) But at least nobody can call me an Eastie.
My only response was to you was thinking the length had something to do with the complexity of the case.
You need serious work on your reading comprehension so I'll try not to be too obtuse. There's no correlation between how complex or non complex a case is and how long it takes an arbitrator to issue his ruling. In other words, a simple case may take a long time or it may not. By the same token, a complex case might take significantly longer than a simple one -- or it may not. Arbitrators work at their own pace and there isn't a darn thing anybody can do about it. Always been that way and always will be.Complex? I thought you implied (or maybe I inferred) that it is obvious that the pilots will lose? Complex? We asked an arbitrator to make a decision on what the "end" date in the pay "freeze" part of the LOA means and that takes years?
Is anybody actually unsure about what the ruling will be?
Verstehst du?
You need serious work on your reading comprehension so I'll try not to be too obtuse. There's no correlation between how complex or non complex a case is and how long it takes an arbitrator to issue his ruling. In other words, a simple case may take a long time or it may not. By the same token, a complex case might take significantly longer than a simple one -- or it may not. Arbitrators work at their own pace and there isn't a darn thing anybody can do about it. Always been that way and always will be.
Verstehst du?
You need serious work on your reading comprehension so I'll try not to be too obtuse.