PCL needs to first take care of his own SCAB (or psuedo-scab)filled airline first (AirTran).
You mean all 20 of them? Yeah, we're really "filled" with them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PCL needs to first take care of his own SCAB (or psuedo-scab)filled airline first (AirTran).
Again, completely different situation. The mainline pilots all voted to allow that outsourcing to the "express" carriers. Stupid decision? Yep, but it was theirs to make. No flying was stolen from them, and no letter or intent of the scope language was violated. It was a willful agreement to outsource the flying. That is not what happened at TSA/GoJet.
Mainline pilot had a proverbial gun to their head in bankruptcy when they allowed such explosive growth of express carriers in relaxing scope. Either they "allow it" or the judge makes them do it. Some choice...
But it'd be a huge eye opener for you.
TSA/GoJet case was decided 3 years ago. How is it a willful disregard for TSA scope when the case has been decided against ALPA and there's no legal appeal??? Makes absolutely ZERO sense. If it was still an ongoing legal process, you might have a point. But with the case decided, with ALPA not appealing the decision and literally forgetting about the case, I gotta ask.... how is it a willful disregard of TSA contract?
Mainline pilots gave up 70-seat scope long before bankruptcy ever entered the equation. If I remember right, DCI was already doing over 35% of DAL's block hours even when DAL scope only allowed for 57 70-seat replacement jets. In any case, it doesn't matter, because no one had a contract rammed down their throat in the end. Every concessionary contract was approved by the membership, and most of them by very large margins. You can try to blame bankruptcy courts, but a vote is a vote.
Not really.
You keep talking about legality, and I'm talking ethics and common sense. Until we break that barrier, this conversation is going nowhere. I don't care about the legality. I care about right and wrong. It's legal to cross a picket line. Doesn't make it right.
Check bankruptcy contracts and report back on freq. Check UAL also while you're at it. See what happened with them, and how much of their flying went to express carriers while they were in BK and how much they suffered in bankruptcy.
OK, do you agree with me that the case has been decided against ALPA?
Do you agree that ALPA did not file any appeals to overturn the ruling?
Do you agree that the legal process has run its due course and it's OVER?
So in light of all that... how can you possibly compare scabbing to GoJet TODAY?
I'm dying to know...
Yes, the legal process is over. The overall situation is not, however.
I've already answered that question numerous times in this thread and others. You just don't seem to like the answer.
The point I was trying to make was simply this: Isnt there more to life than arguing with a computer screen all day?
8 posts ------ call the FBO to see if the C150 is open this weekend---D0UCHE!!!!200 Posts in 3 years? I hardly think he is doing that. Try again.
So are the Republic guys actually going to do this flying even though it's a violation of their contract? Can't they refuse to do it? And what was the outcome of that Sept 16th meeting? It's beginning to look like BOTH unions are about to roll over and take it in the can on this one...